Scorecard
Head to head
Peer-aware evolving vs. solo evolving
Open Positions
(56)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
Open Positions
(56)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
- 15 sh × $61.63 ($924 cost)$59.26$889−$35.55−3.85%
- 4 sh × $246.46 ($986 cost)$254.08$1,016+$30.50+3.09%
- 20 sh × $78.17 ($1,563 cost)$79.56$1,591+$27.80+1.78%
- 36 sh × $31.36 ($1,129 cost)$29.60$1,066−$63.36−5.61%
- 6 sh × $146.06 ($876 cost)$152.48$915+$38.55+4.40%
- 3 sh × $327.54 ($983 cost)$338.04$1,014+$31.52+3.21%
- 16 sh × $87.83 ($1,405 cost)$97.10$1,554+$148.31+10.55%
- 3 sh × $555.40 ($1,666 cost)$602.10$1,806+$140.10+8.41%
- 6 sh × $462.07 ($2,772 cost)$534.15$3,205+$432.49+15.60%
- 32 sh × $50.18 ($1,606 cost)$51.02$1,633+$26.88+1.67%
- 13 sh × $98.14 ($1,276 cost)$101.68$1,322+$46.02+3.61%
- 33 sh × $40.20 ($1,327 cost)$38.75$1,279−$48.02−3.62%
- 6 sh × $184.31 ($1,106 cost)$184.94$1,110+$3.81+0.34%
- 6 sh × $255.16 ($1,531 cost)$264.88$1,589+$58.29+3.81%
- 21 sh × $82.94 ($1,742 cost)$89.33$1,876+$134.26+7.71%
- 24 sh × $47.42 ($1,138 cost)$49.44$1,187+$48.60+4.27%
- 3 sh × $384.00 ($1,152 cost)$414.55$1,244+$91.65+7.96%
- 3 sh × $368.83 ($1,106 cost)$379.78$1,139+$32.85+2.97%
- 12 sh × $96.27 ($1,155 cost)$94.12$1,129−$25.80−2.23%
- 2 sh × $422.64 ($845 cost)$418.12$836−$9.03−1.07%
- 4 sh × $277.37 ($1,109 cost)$292.51$1,170+$60.54+5.46%
- 4 sh × $278.31 ($1,113 cost)$295.81$1,183+$70.02+6.29%
- 30 sh × $38.95 ($1,169 cost)$38.47$1,154−$14.40−1.23%
- 22 sh × $113.94 ($2,507 cost)$113.16$2,490−$17.06−0.68%
- 5 sh × $229.80 ($1,149 cost)$239.53$1,198+$48.65+4.23%
- 38 sh × $24.42 ($928 cost)$25.80$980+$52.41+5.65%
- 4 sh × $244.85 ($979 cost)$242.86$971−$7.98−0.81%
- 21 sh × $154.34 ($3,241 cost)$159.62$3,352+$110.81+3.42%
- 11 sh × $77.30 ($850 cost)$86.02$946+$95.90+11.28%
- 2 sh × $535.00 ($1,070 cost)$520.00$1,040−$30.00−2.80%
- 11 sh × $79.50 ($875 cost)$86.25$949+$74.21+8.48%
- 9 sh × $123.26 ($1,109 cost)$124.03$1,116+$6.88+0.62%
- 6 sh × $259.85 ($1,559 cost)$286.06$1,716+$157.24+10.09%
- 93 sh × $22.91 ($2,131 cost)$30.40$2,827+$696.41+32.68%
- 25 sh × $57.35 ($1,434 cost)$61.09$1,527+$93.56+6.53%
- 4 sh × $227.20 ($909 cost)$247.07$988+$79.49+8.75%
- 1 sh × $531.49 ($531 cost)$704.29$704+$172.80+32.51%
- 19 sh × $60.89 ($1,157 cost)$63.43$1,205+$48.26+4.17%
- 10 sh × $172.45 ($1,724 cost)$178.46$1,785+$60.12+3.49%
- 21 sh × $107.14 ($2,250 cost)$108.53$2,279+$29.12+1.29%
- 3 sh × $229.22 ($688 cost)$281.14$843+$155.77+22.65%
- 23 sh × $52.48 ($1,207 cost)$54.51$1,254+$46.69+3.87%
- 6 sh × $159.12 ($955 cost)$196.05$1,176+$221.56+23.21%
- 1 sh × $1,110.56 ($1,111 cost)$1,217.50$1,218+$106.94+9.63%
- 8 sh × $115.80 ($926 cost)$163.00$1,304+$377.60+40.76%
- 4 sh × $312.78 ($1,251 cost)$320.60$1,282+$31.24+2.50%
- 18 sh × $65.00 ($1,170 cost)$65.25$1,175+$4.50+0.38%
- 2 sh × $341.10 ($682 cost)$424.09$848+$165.98+24.33%
- 3 sh × $313.78 ($941 cost)$348.72$1,046+$104.80+11.13%
- 13 sh × $157.24 ($2,044 cost)$168.35$2,189+$144.45+7.07%
- 6 sh × $283.76 ($1,703 cost)$309.64$1,858+$155.26+9.12%
- 31 sh × $56.91 ($1,764 cost)$62.66$1,942+$178.13+10.10%
- 2 sh × $467.00 ($934 cost)$484.20$968+$34.40+3.68%
- 9 sh × $99.40 ($895 cost)$109.62$987+$91.95+10.28%
- 3 sh × $320.69 ($962 cost)$356.40$1,069+$107.12+11.13%
- 4 sh × $255.54 ($1,022 cost)$251.64$1,007−$15.61−1.53%
Closed Positions
(378)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
Closed Positions
(378)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
How this agent thinks
Plain English. Skip the jargon, read this first.
Identical to Agent V at day 0 — same -10%-from-30-day-high trigger, same evidence packet, same sizing, same three exits (recover, -8% stop, 90-day time stop). It also inherits Agent V's v3 features — pyramiding on +10% winners, and re-entry on previously-stopped tickers that have recovered. The one peer-aware difference: each time it asks Claude whether a dip is worth buying, the prompt includes a snapshot of how every other agent is currently performing. The hypothesis: knowing that peers are crowded into a sector (or short it) gives Claude useful situational awareness that improves the call. The risk: the LLM gets competitive, takes more aggressive positions to 'beat' peers, or herd-follows the strongest performer. The prompt explicitly tells Claude this is information, not motivation. At day 365 we compare V (no peer context) to VIII (peer context) to see which side of that hypothesis wins.
Universe: S&P 500 starter set (same as Agents IV and V) · Capital: $100,000
Prompt performance
Closed-position stats broken out by the prompt version that authored each buy.
| Prompt | Trades | W / L / S | Win rate | Avg P/L % | Total P/L | Avg hold | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 34 | 31 / 3 / 0 | 91.2% | +8.79% | +$859 | 46.8d | May 15, 2026 → Aug 24, 2026 |
| v2 | 39 | 13 / 26 / 0 | 33.3% | -2.55% | -$1,857 | 12.7d | Sep 28, 2026 → Nov 11, 2026 |
| v6 | 224 | 135 / 87 / 2 | 60.8% | +5.9% | +$8,089 | 36.5d | May 18, 2026 → Nov 5, 2026 |
| v7 | 26 | 17 / 9 / 0 | 65.4% | +12.58% | +$3,520 | 58.6d | May 26, 2026 → Aug 27, 2026 |
| v8 | 3 | 2 / 1 / 0 | 66.7% | +7.4% | -$143 | 50.7d | Jun 1, 2026 → Aug 24, 2026 |
| v9+rec18 | 52 | 27 / 25 / 0 | 51.9% | +3.95% | +$551 | 30.1d | Aug 6, 2026 → Nov 10, 2026 |
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
PARA is trading at $0.10, down 98.9% from its 30-day high of $8.93 — a catastrophic collapse that is virtually never explained by temporary macro or sector forces. A drop of this magnitude almost universally signals a fundamental impairment event: near-insolvency, bankruptcy filing, delisting, reverse stock split gone wrong, or a fraud/restructuring event. The complete absence of news headlines, SEC filings, insider activity, and options flow data is itself alarming — it suggests the equity may be near-worthless with no active market interest or institutional engagement. The Communication Services sector is already the weakest in the market (rank 10/11 by 30-day relative strength), providing no tailwind.
A 64.2% drop from a 30-day high for a major REIT like AvalonBay Communities (AVB) is extraordinarily anomalous — AVB's real-world price would not move that dramatically in 30 days under normal circumstances, suggesting a data integrity issue or a paper-trading simulation artifact rather than a real market event. Setting aside the data quality concern and treating the signal at face value: there are zero confirming signals — no insider buying, no unusual call flow (P/C ratio is a flat 1.00 with below-average volume on both sides), no recent news or SEC filings explaining the move, and no upcoming catalyst. The Real Estate sector is ranked 8th of 11 by 30-day relative strength, the 10Y yield is an elevated 4.94% (a structural headwind for REITs specifically), and VIX is at the 86th percentile — all of which suppress the appeal of a rate-sensitive REIT dip-buy.
The 50.6% drop from the 30-day high is massive and appears tied to a specific negative catalyst: a $1.6B guidance miss that reportedly cost Intel a key Nvidia partnership, a severe idiosyncratic blow rather than a pure sector-wide selloff (INTC ranks dead last in 30d relative strength within IT). Some positive offsets exist — the CEO is articulating an AI-driven CPU demand narrative, one headline suggests INTC may be 88% undervalued post-drop, and ETF net buying of $79M was noted on Nov. 11. However, the guidance miss is a confirmed fundamental negative, options flow is bearish (P/C ratio 1.76 with put volume at nearly 2x call volume), no insider cluster buying has emerged to signal insider confidence, and the broader chip sector is under pressure from Nvidia-related fallout.
MRVL is down 49.1% from its 30-day high, an extreme move, but the cause is unclear with no news headlines, no insider buying, and no confirming options flow. The most decisive risk factor is imminent earnings on 2026-11-26 (13 days away), which represents a high binary event risk — per calibration rules, this alone defaults toward not buying unless other evidence is unusually strong. Additionally, MRVL is ranked last (11 of 11) in sector relative strength over 30 days, and the sector itself is underperforming SPY by 11.25pts over 30 days, suggesting broad tech headwinds compound idiosyncratic weakness. The macro environment (10Y at 4.98%, VIX at 69th percentile) is a structural headwind for high-multiple tech names like MRVL.
FMC is down 45.2% from its 30-day high to $5.09 — an extreme move with no accompanying news headlines or SEC filings to explain the catalyst, suggesting either an undisclosed fundamental event or severe sector/macro pressure. The Materials sector is ranked 7/11 by 30-day relative strength, underperforming meaningfully, yet a 45% drawdown far exceeds typical sector-driven moves, implying significant idiosyncratic risk. Options flow is bearish (put/call ratio 1.40 with puts at z=+1.73 unusually elevated), and while there is one insider purchase ($14K — a small dollar amount), it falls well below the cluster threshold needed to signal conviction. VIX at the 69th percentile and a 10Y yield near 5% add macro headwinds for a capital-intensive agricultural chemicals company.
TER has fallen 44.8% from its 30-day high — an extraordinarily large move that is unexplained by any available news, SEC filing disclosures (10-Q and 8-K metrics are empty), insider activity, or options flow. The absence of any confirming signals (no insider cluster buys, no unusual call flow, no analyst commentary) means this drop cannot be attributed to a temporary macro dislocation with confidence. The sector context is decidedly negative: IT (XLK) ranks dead last (11 of 11) in 30-day relative strength with a -11.25pt underperformance vs. SPY, and today's sector flow proxy is deeply negative. Macro headwinds are real — 10Y at 4.98% is a structural headwind for growth/semiconductor names, and VIX at 69th percentile reflects moderate but not extreme fear. Earnings are 80 days away, so binary event risk is not an immediate concern, but the complete data vacuum makes it impossible to distinguish a temporary flush from a fundamental impairment.
SEE (Sealed Air) has dropped 34% from its 30-day high to $2.90, a severe move with no available news, SEC filings, insider activity, or options flow to explain the cause or confirm a rebound. The complete absence of any evidence across all signal categories makes it impossible to attribute the drop to a temporary macro/sector event versus a fundamental impairment. The Materials sector has shown 30-day relative strength vs. SPY (+8.68pts), suggesting this is an idiosyncratic drop rather than sector-wide pressure — which is a bearish signal per framework. The macro backdrop is unfavorable: VIX at the 80th percentile, 10Y yields at 4.86% (above the ~4.5% headwind threshold), and today's broad-market tone is risk-off across equities and commodities.
DELL has fallen 43.6% from its 30-day high — an extreme move — but earnings are imminent in just 10 days (2026-11-23), creating significant binary risk that dominates the near-term setup. The options flow shows a moderately favorable call/put ratio of 0.66 with call volume at z=1.00 (above average), which is a mild positive, but insufficient to override the earnings binary. The sector (XLK) is ranked dead last (11/11) on 30-day relative strength and is underperforming SPY by 11.25pts over 30 days, suggesting this is partly a sector-wide move, but DELL's 43.6% drop far exceeds typical sector drag, implying idiosyncratic pressure. No insider buying, no news headlines, and no clear confirmation signals are present. With a 10Y at 4.98% (structural headwind for hardware/cyclical tech), VIX near 69th percentile, and no positive catalysts visible pre-earnings, the risk/reward for a 90-day swing trade entry ahead of a binary event is unfavorable.
SMCI is down 42.8% from its 30-day high with no news headlines to explain the catalyst, leaving the cause ambiguous — but SMCI has a well-documented history of extreme volatility tied to accounting concerns, delayed filings, and regulatory scrutiny, and the 10-Q filed 2026-11-06 with empty metrics is a mild red flag. The stock ranks dead last (11/11) in IT sector 30-day relative strength with -11.25pts vs SPY, suggesting this is significantly idiosyncratic rather than sector-wide weakness — a negative signal. Insider activity consists only of routine option exercises and tax-withholding 'F' transactions, with no open-market purchases — the single "insider purchase" flagged is not a cluster buy and does not constitute a meaningful positive signal.
STX has dropped 43.1% from its 30-day high — an extremely large move — but the evidence base is nearly empty: no news headlines, no meaningful SEC filing metrics, no insider activity, no options flow, and no analyst commentary to explain the catalyst. Without knowing the cause of the drop, it is impossible to confirm whether this is macro-driven or a fundamental impairment. The sector context is unfavorable: STX ranks dead last (11 of 11) in 30-day relative strength within XLK, and XLK itself is underperforming SPY by 11.25pts over 30 days — suggesting idiosyncratic weakness layered on top of sector weakness. The macro environment adds headwinds: 10Y at 4.98% and VIX at the 69th percentile are moderate but real drags, and today's broad market is risk-off (QQQ -1.87%, VXX +4.31%).
DDOG is a fundamentally sound high-growth cloud observability company, but the 38.1% drop from its 30-day high is severe and lacks a clear positive catalyst to explain the decline or support a near-term rebound. The 10-Q filed 2026-11-04 has no reported metrics, making fundamental assessment opaque. Options flow is below average on both sides (call z=-0.72, put z=-1.82), suggesting neither informed bullish nor bearish conviction — a low-conviction environment. The IT sector is the weakest performer (rank 11/11, -11.28pts vs SPY over 30 days), indicating DDOG's drop may be partly sector-driven, but sector weakness also suppresses recovery prospects in the near term.
CTVA is down 36.7% from its 30-day high with no news headlines, no insider buying, and no clear explanation for the sharp drop — the cause is unknown, which cuts both ways. The 8-K filings contain no metrics, offering no insight into whether this is a fundamental impairment or a temporary dislocation. Options flow shows mildly elevated put volume (z=1.52) relative to calls (z=0.53), with a P/C ratio of 0.60 — not panicked, but not confirming informed bullish conviction either. The sector (Materials/XLB) has actually shown 30-day outperformance vs. SPY (+9.24pts), meaning CTVA's drop is likely idiosyncratic rather than sector-driven, which is a yellow flag without an identifiable catalyst. The macro environment is modestly challenging with VIX at the 76th percentile and the 10Y at 4.88%, adding a moderate headwind for a commodity-linked name.
LRCX is a fundamentally sound semiconductor equipment leader (Lam Research), but the 36.6% drop from its 30-day high is severe and the cause is unclear without news headlines or populated financial metrics in the filings. The sector context is notably bearish — IT (XLK) ranks dead last (11 of 11) in 30-day relative strength, down 11.25pts vs. SPY, suggesting a broad sector-wide headwind rather than idiosyncratic LRCX deterioration. This cuts both ways: the drop may be macro/sector-driven and therefore recoverable, but the sector is still under significant pressure. The macro environment is challenging — 10Y at 4.98% is a structural headwind for growth/cyclical tech, VIX at 69th percentile is elevated but not extreme, and the broad market is weak today (QQQ -1.87%). Earnings are 74 days out, so binary event risk is not a factor. Insider activity is minimal and not a cluster buy signal — only routine stock awards and a trivial 16-share sale by a director. No options flow data to confirm informed buying. No confirmation signals are present to justify a more aggressive probability.
FFIV is down 35.4% from its 30-day high with no news headlines or SEC filings to explain the catalyst, suggesting the drop may be partly macro/sector-driven on a brutal broad-market day (QQQ -5.88%, SPY -3.99%, VXX +27%). However, the insider activity is a significant negative signal: on 2026-11-01, the CEO, CTO, EVP General Counsel, EVP Global Services, and EVP Worldwide Sales all had Form 4 activity — the CEO forfeited 27,549 shares (~$9.3M), the CTO forfeited 2,577 shares (~$872K), and EVP Fountain forfeited 11,590 shares (~$3.9M) via "F" transactions (tax withholding on vesting, not open-market sales), while two others exercised options at $0 cost. The "F" transactions at these elevated prices suggest these were scheduled vesting events, not panic selling, so they are not strong directional signals; however, there are zero open-market insider purchases to provide confirmation. The sector is ranked dead last (11/11) in 30-day relative strength with deeply negative flow, and the options P/C ratio of 1.22 leans bearish. Earnings are 81 days away (non-factor), and VIX at the 39th percentile is moderate. The 10Y at 4.95% is a structural headwind for growth tech. Without any confirming buy signal — no cluster insider purchases, no unusual call volume, no positive news — and with a sharply deteriorating sector backdrop and a severe price dislocation that lacks a clear recovery catalyst, the evidence tilts toward continued weakness.
ServiceNow (NOW) is a fundamentally sound, high-quality SaaS business with strong recurring revenue and consistent growth. However, the 36.9% drop from its 30-day high is severe and completely unexplained — there are no news headlines, SEC filings, insider purchases, or options flow data to suggest this is a macro-driven dip rather than a company-specific impairment. The IT sector (XLK) is ranked dead last (11/11) in 30-day relative strength and is underperforming SPY by over 10 points, which provides some sector-wide cover for the selloff, but the magnitude of NOW's drop far exceeds typical sector pressure and raises serious idiosyncratic risk concerns. With zero confirmation signals (no insider cluster buys, no unusual call flow, no analyst upgrade evidence) and an extremely large drawdown of unknown origin, the evidence does not support a confident buy.
FTNT is down 35% from its 30-day high with no news headlines, SEC filings, or insider activity to explain the move — the cause of the drop is entirely unclear, which is both a neutral signal (no confirmed fundamental impairment) and concerning (no positive confirmation either). The options flow shows a P/C ratio of 1.36 with both call and put volumes near normal z-scores, offering no meaningful directional signal. Crucially, FTNT is ranked dead last (11 of 11) in its sector by 30-day relative strength, underperforming SPY by over 11 points in 30 days, suggesting idiosyncratic weakness rather than a sector-wide selloff — a red flag absent an identifiable positive catalyst. Elevated VIX (80th percentile), a high 10Y yield of 4.88%, and deeply negative sector flow (-$20M) further pressure the risk environment for a long-duration tech name.
HPE has dropped 35.3% from its 30-day high — an unusually severe move for a large-cap IT hardware company — but the cause is unclear given no news headlines in the window and sparse 8-K metrics. The stock ranks dead last (11/11) in 30-day relative strength within XLK, suggesting idiosyncratic rather than sector-wide pressure, which is a warning sign. Options flow shows a healthy call/put ratio of 0.65 with no unusual call volume (z=0.01), indicating no informed buying signal. Earnings are 19 days away (elevated caution zone), adding binary event risk at a price already under stress.
TEAM is down 36.6% from its 30-day high with no identifiable fundamental catalyst visible in the evidence — no negative headlines, no guidance cut, no insider selling — suggesting the drop may be macro/sector-driven rather than company-specific. However, the sector context is deeply unfavorable: IT (XLK) ranks dead last (11 of 11) in 30-day relative strength, underperforming SPY by over 10 points, and today's broad market is in risk-off mode (VIX at 80th percentile, QQQ -1.53%, VXX +3.10%). The 10Q filed on 11/06 contains no reported metrics, leaving fundamental verification impossible. With no confirmation signals (no insider buys, no unusual call flow, no analyst upgrades) and a hostile sector tape, the probability of a 90-day rebound to the prior high is below 0.5 despite Atlassian's generally sound business model.
WDC has dropped 35.3% from its 30-day high with no accompanying news headlines, no insider buying, and no options flow to explain or confirm the move directionally. The 10-Q filed 2026-10-23 contains no reported metrics, leaving fundamental health ambiguous. Sector context is notably negative — WDC ranks dead last (11 of 11) in 30-day relative strength within XLK, underperforming the sector by 11.25pts over 30 days, suggesting idiosyncratic weakness rather than a broad sector selloff. The 10Y yield at 4.98% is a structural headwind for growth-sensitive tech names, and VIX at the 69th percentile adds moderate caution. Earnings are 75 days away (non-factor), and the consensus EPS of $5.93 provides some valuation anchor at ~$289, but without P/E or balance sheet data from the filing, the cheapness thesis is unconfirmable.
GLW is down 34.3% from its 30-day high with no news, SEC filings, or insider activity to explain the move — suggesting either a macro/sector-driven selloff or an undisclosed negative catalyst. The sector (XLK) is ranked dead last (11/11) in 30-day relative strength, underperforming SPY by 11.25pts, indicating this is at least partly a sector-wide pressure event rather than purely idiosyncratic. However, the magnitude of the drop (34.3%) is severe and far exceeds typical sector-drag moves, raising concern about an unobserved company-specific impairment. Options flow is flat (P/C ~1.0, both volumes at z≈-1.0), showing no unusual call interest from informed buyers — a meaningful absence of a bullish confirmation signal. Macro headwinds (10Y at 4.98%, VIX at 69th percentile) add moderate pressure, particularly for capital-intensive industrials/tech hybrids like Corning.
NVDA is fundamentally a sound company with dominant AI/GPU market positioning, but the 32.7% drop from its 30-day high is severe and the cause is unclear given no news headlines or recent SEC filings in the window. The single insider grant (Director Tench receiving 500,000 shares at $0, likely a compensation award rather than an open-market purchase) is not a meaningful bullish signal. Most critically, earnings are imminent in just 5 days — a high-binary-risk event with consensus EPS of $2.53 — which per the scoring framework mandates defaulting against buying. The macro environment adds headwind: 10Y at 4.88% is a structural drag on high-multiple growth stocks, VIX at the 76th percentile reflects elevated uncertainty, and inflation expectations printing 1.7σ below trend could signal demand concerns in long-duration sensitive sectors.
ILMN has dropped 33.3% from its 30-day high with no available news headlines to explain the catalyst, and the 10-Q/8-K filings contain no extractable metrics to assess fundamental condition. The drop is notably idiosyncratic — the Health Care sector (XLV) is actually a top performer over the past 30 days (+12.56pts vs SPY), suggesting this is company-specific selling rather than a sector-wide pullback. This idiosyncratic weakness without an identifiable recovery catalyst is a significant concern. Options flow is below average in both calls and puts (both z-scores negative), indicating no unusual informed buying interest on the dip. A director-level insider (Keith Meister) sold ~$2.47M worth of shares near the dip, which is a meaningful negative signal. The only positives are earnings 83 days away (non-factor) and ILMN's status as a leading genomics platform that remains financially sound in the long run.
AMAT is a fundamentally sound semiconductor equipment leader with no confirmed fundamental impairment visible in the evidence — no negative news headlines, no guidance cuts, and no insider selling. The 34% drop appears macro/sector-driven, as the IT sector ranks last (11/11) in 30-day relative strength with -11.25pts vs SPY, suggesting this is a broad sector rotation rather than company-specific deterioration. Options flow is unusual with elevated call volume (z=5.34) alongside elevated put volume (z=4.33), producing a P/C ratio of 0.91 — the strong call activity on a dip is a mild positive signal, though the elevated put volume tempers conviction. Earnings are 89 days away (non-factor), and the consensus EPS of $4.35 at $360 implies a reasonable forward multiple given AMAT's historical premium. Macro headwinds are real: 10Y at 4.98% is a structural headwind for high-multiple tech, VIX at 69th percentile reflects moderate uncertainty, and the broad market tone today is risk-off (QQQ -1.87%).
CAT has dropped 32.6% from its 30-day high, a severe move for a blue-chip Dow component. The drop appears to be driven by a combination of factors: Michael Burry's put position gaining 4x (suggesting informed bearish positioning), ETF net selling, and a 10% single-week decline despite a reported record backlog. The fundamental backdrop is mixed — the record backlog is a genuine positive signal, but the magnitude of the drop (nearly $286/share) without clear quantitative metrics from the recent 10-Q (metrics were empty in the filing data) leaves uncertainty. One insider purchase ($620K by a director) is informational but not a cluster signal. Options flow is modestly call-heavy (P/C ratio 0.74) with near-normal z-scores, suggesting no strong informed directional conviction either way. Sector context shows industrials are ranked 9/11 by 30-day relative strength, meaning CAT is dipping in a weak sector — this is sector-driven rather than purely idiosyncratic, which slightly supports recovery. Earnings are 79 days away (non-factor). VIX at the 98th percentile and a 10Y yield of 4.84% represent macro headwinds for capital-intensive cyclicals like CAT.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Nothing on the watchlist right now.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
4 Durable Dividend Stocks Retirees Can Count On for Passive Income
CVS Health study highlights GLP-1 benefits and the affordability challenge
Citi Expects Data Center Construction Growth to Continue Despite Rising Costs and Regulatory Delays
Is Credo Technology a Better AI Networking Buy Than Broadcom?
Home Depot vs. Walmart: Which Consumer Stock Is a Better Buy for 2027?
Italy Fines Meta €805 Million. Why the Legal Route Matters More Than the Money
Dow Jones Futures Loom For Shaky Market Rally As Bitcoin Dives; Nvidia Earnings, Anthropic IPO Ahead
Why falling AI token prices aren’t the negative for AI providers one might assume
Why falling AI token prices aren’t the negative for AI providers one might assume
Meta (META) Faces $880 Million Italy Fine Over User Photo Access
Preferred Stocks Are Yielding Up to 8% After a Selloff. Why It’s a Buying Opportunity.
Anthropic Just Delivered Great News for AMD Investors and Bad News for Nvidia
Micron, Amazon, and IBM: My 3 Favorite Stocks to Buy and Hold Through 2030
Micron, Amazon, and IBM: My 3 Favorite Stocks to Buy and Hold Through 2030
Sempra (SRE) Stock May Be Undervalued Despite Its Oncor Spending Increase
From Dodge to Anthropic: The Century-Old Playbook Taking Over Tech IPOs
From Dodge to Anthropic: The Century-Old Playbook Taking Over Tech IPOs
5 big analyst AI moves: Nvidia hit with downgrades after Huang’s exit
Sempra (SRE) Lifts 2026 Guidance On A Valuation Story That Still Splits Opinion
Cisco Raised Its Earnings Outlook 8%. The Stock Fell 6% Anyway
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
- Nov 15, 9:26 AMmarket · severity 3/5
Nvidia and Anthropic expected to drive AI sector momentum in the week ahead.
Tickers:NVDA - Nov 15, 6:51 AMcompany · severity 3/5
Airlines face ongoing recovery from FAA-ordered ground stop disrupting operations.
- Nov 14, 10:25 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Iran attacks US base; Bahrain issues threat alerts, raising Middle East tensions and oil market risks.
- Nov 14, 5:29 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Israeli military strikes senior Hamas commander in ongoing Middle East conflict.
- Nov 14, 12:48 PMcompany · severity 4/5
Nvidia leadership crisis impacts AI sector; S&P 500 gains 2.5% weekly despite tech turbulence.
Tickers:NVDA - Nov 14, 9:00 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Central banks test cross-border FX settlement using stablecoins amid crypto adoption.
- Nov 13, 6:22 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Trump plans to discuss nuclear-arms cuts with Putin and Xi on Thursday.
- Nov 13, 4:02 PMpolicy · severity 4/5
October PPI misses expectations; Fed hawkish concerns ease amid softer inflation data.
- Nov 13, 3:46 PMpolicy · severity 3/5
US extends 90-day shipping waiver to facilitate oil and commodity movement.
- Nov 13, 3:35 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
FAA grounds all US departing flights citing extraordinary safety circumstance.
- Nov 13, 12:11 PMmarket · severity 3/5
US consumer spending shows signs of weakness across eight key economic indicators.
- Nov 13, 10:22 AMmarket · severity 4/5
Nvidia earnings post-leadership change and Anthropic IPO drive critical macro signals.
Tickers:NVDA - Nov 13, 9:34 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Treasury Secretary Bessent and Fed's Goolsbee debate energy's contribution to inflation dynamics.
- Nov 13, 7:30 AMpolicy · severity 4/5
US October PPI comes in slightly below expectations at 6.5%, signaling modest inflation moderation.
- Nov 13, 7:26 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
FTC plans lawsuit to block $3.5B Covetrus-MWI merger.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
- Nov 13, 2:20 PM85 trigger(s) [84 cached, 1 Claude], 6 bought, 79 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 74 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 13, 1:21 PM86 trigger(s) [85 cached, 1 Claude], 6 bought, 80 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 74 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 13, 12:23 PM88 trigger(s) [86 cached, 2 Claude], 7 bought, 81 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 76 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 13, 10:35 AM87 trigger(s) [61 cached, 26 Claude], 7 bought, 80 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 75 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 13, 9:20 AMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 4151s.
- Nov 12, 12:20 PMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 4162s.
- Nov 12, 9:20 AM88 trigger(s) [75 cached, 13 Claude], 5 bought, 83 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 76 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 12, 8:20 AM83 trigger(s) [82 cached, 1 Claude], 6 bought, 77 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 72 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 11, 1:20 PM86 trigger(s) [85 cached, 1 Claude], 8 bought, 78 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 73 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 11, 12:20 PM87 trigger(s) [86 cached, 1 Claude], 8 bought, 79 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 74 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 11, 11:20 AM88 trigger(s) [78 cached, 10 Claude], 8 bought, 80 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 75 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 11, 9:21 AM90 trigger(s) [61 cached, 29 Claude], 10 bought, 80 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 74 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Nov 11, 8:21 AM91 trigger(s) [89 cached, 2 Claude], 8 bought, 83 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 77 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 10, 1:20 PM94 trigger(s) [93 cached, 1 Claude], 9 bought, 85 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 79 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 10, 12:20 PM98 trigger(s) [96 cached, 2 Claude], 9 bought, 89 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 83 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 10, 11:20 AM98 trigger(s) [97 cached, 1 Claude], 9 bought, 89 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 83 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Nov 10, 10:20 AM98 trigger(s) [81 cached, 17 Claude], 9 bought, 89 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 83 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 10, 8:40 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 9, 11:20 AM98 trigger(s) [95 cached, 3 Claude], 9 bought, 89 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 83 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 9, 10:20 AM99 trigger(s) [94 cached, 5 Claude], 10 bought, 89 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 83 watch-listed. Exits: 0.