Scorecard
Head to head
Peer-aware evolving vs. solo evolving
Open Positions
(58)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
Open Positions
(58)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
- 1 sh × $97.09 ($97 cost)$88.74$89−$8.35−8.60%
- 5 sh × $377.86 ($1,889 cost)$374.89$1,874−$14.87−0.79%
- 1 sh × $83.40 ($83 cost)$77.24$77−$6.16−7.39%
- 1 sh × $117.07 ($117 cost)$114.47$114−$2.60−2.22%
- 1 sh × $348.67 ($349 cost)$350.38$350+$1.71+0.49%
- 5 sh × $367.18 ($1,836 cost)$367.64$1,838+$2.30+0.13%
- 6 sh × $257.54 ($1,545 cost)$277.13$1,663+$117.56+7.61%
- 1 sh × $154.87 ($155 cost)$157.99$158+$3.12+2.01%
- 6 sh × $72.92 ($438 cost)$80.61$484+$46.12+10.54%
- 1 sh × $75.52 ($76 cost)$73.61$74−$1.91−2.53%
- 22 sh × $101.87 ($2,241 cost)$116.08$2,554+$312.62+13.95%
- 7 sh × $214.33 ($1,500 cost)$220.22$1,542+$41.23+2.75%
- 5 sh × $249.59 ($1,248 cost)$263.49$1,317+$69.50+5.57%
- 7 sh × $190.57 ($1,334 cost)$198.64$1,390+$56.45+4.23%
- 4 sh × $269.39 ($1,078 cost)$282.86$1,131+$53.88+5.00%
- 16 sh × $233.45 ($3,735 cost)$267.85$4,286+$550.35+14.73%
- 22 sh × $78.77 ($1,733 cost)$89.58$1,971+$237.84+13.72%
- 2 sh × $614.03 ($1,228 cost)$629.70$1,259+$31.34+2.55%
- 16 sh × $49.52 ($792 cost)$70.92$1,135+$342.29+43.20%
- 9 sh × $190.87 ($1,718 cost)$208.54$1,877+$159.03+9.26%
- 32 sh × $31.62 ($1,012 cost)$31.48$1,007−$4.64−0.46%
- 45 sh × $26.88 ($1,210 cost)$26.05$1,172−$37.35−3.09%
- 16 sh × $114.58 ($1,833 cost)$137.69$2,203+$369.70+20.17%
- 3 sh × $15.51 ($47 cost)$21.63$65+$18.36+39.44%
- 26 sh × $42.13 ($1,095 cost)$50.88$1,323+$227.41+20.76%
- 7 sh × $213.52 ($1,495 cost)$224.08$1,569+$73.90+4.94%
- 18 sh × $135.55 ($2,440 cost)$148.01$2,664+$224.34+9.19%
- 5 sh × $215.04 ($1,075 cost)$214.61$1,073−$2.17−0.20%
- 25 sh × $87.72 ($2,193 cost)$93.29$2,332+$139.23+6.35%
- 5 sh × $199.92 ($1,000 cost)$251.47$1,257+$257.77+25.79%
- 8 sh × $143.47 ($1,148 cost)$153.24$1,226+$78.12+6.81%
- 5 sh × $201.14 ($1,006 cost)$238.22$1,191+$185.38+18.43%
- 6 sh × $185.22 ($1,111 cost)$175.19$1,051−$60.21−5.42%
- 20 sh × $88.49 ($1,770 cost)$90.89$1,818+$48.00+2.71%
- 3 sh × $306.76 ($920 cost)$333.58$1,001+$80.46+8.74%
- 15 sh × $114.05 ($1,711 cost)$119.35$1,790+$79.50+4.65%
- 24 sh × $75.91 ($1,822 cost)$84.16$2,020+$197.92+10.86%
- 13 sh × $129.55 ($1,684 cost)$141.54$1,840+$155.85+9.25%
- 6 sh × $308.10 ($1,849 cost)$348.77$2,093+$244.00+13.20%
- 21 sh × $85.22 ($1,790 cost)$91.43$1,920+$130.41+7.29%
- 1 sh × $862.72 ($863 cost)$968.31$968+$105.59+12.24%
- 3 sh × $320.90 ($963 cost)$334.46$1,003+$40.68+4.23%
- 6 sh × $303.48 ($1,821 cost)$316.94$1,902+$80.76+4.44%
- 10 sh × $176.83 ($1,768 cost)$187.87$1,879+$110.33+6.24%
- 3 sh × $303.39 ($910 cost)$287.58$863−$47.43−5.21%
- 16 sh × $111.55 ($1,785 cost)$116.86$1,870+$84.99+4.76%
- 6 sh × $233.32 ($1,400 cost)$235.91$1,415+$15.56+1.11%
- 31 sh × $57.83 ($1,793 cost)$61.54$1,908+$114.78+6.40%
- 25 sh × $58.08 ($1,452 cost)$63.45$1,586+$134.05+9.23%
- 2 sh × $475.20 ($950 cost)$462.00$924−$26.40−2.78%
- 2 sh × $516.01 ($1,032 cost)$505.37$1,011−$21.29−2.06%
- 10 sh × $168.11 ($1,681 cost)$192.70$1,927+$245.86+14.62%
- 12 sh × $146.71 ($1,761 cost)$163.96$1,968+$207.00+11.76%
- 13 sh × $72.68 ($945 cost)$76.46$994+$49.14+5.20%
- 3 sh × $432.68 ($1,298 cost)$450.00$1,350+$51.96+4.00%
- 27 sh × $43.98 ($1,187 cost)$47.11$1,272+$84.38+7.11%
- 2 sh × $403.92 ($808 cost)$406.29$813+$4.74+0.59%
- 4 sh × $274.97 ($1,100 cost)$266.77$1,067−$32.80−2.98%
Closed Positions
(98)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
Closed Positions
(98)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
How this agent thinks
Plain English. Skip the jargon, read this first.
Identical to Agent V at day 0 — same -10%-from-30-day-high trigger, same evidence packet, same sizing, same three exits (recover, -8% stop, 90-day time stop). It also inherits Agent V's v3 features — pyramiding on +10% winners, and re-entry on previously-stopped tickers that have recovered. The one peer-aware difference: each time it asks Claude whether a dip is worth buying, the prompt includes a snapshot of how every other agent is currently performing. The hypothesis: knowing that peers are crowded into a sector (or short it) gives Claude useful situational awareness that improves the call. The risk: the LLM gets competitive, takes more aggressive positions to 'beat' peers, or herd-follows the strongest performer. The prompt explicitly tells Claude this is information, not motivation. At day 365 we compare V (no peer context) to VIII (peer context) to see which side of that hypothesis wins.
Universe: S&P 500 starter set (same as Agents IV and V) · Capital: $100,000
Prompt performance
Closed-position stats broken out by the prompt version that authored each buy.
| Prompt | Trades | W / L / S | Win rate | Avg P/L % | Total P/L | Avg hold | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 21 | 19 / 2 / 0 | 90.5% | +8.76% | +$470 | 28.1d | May 15, 2026 → Jun 18, 2026 |
| v6 | 69 | 46 / 21 / 2 | 68.7% | +7.88% | +$3,348 | 17.3d | May 18, 2026 → Jun 29, 2026 |
| v7 | 7 | 1 / 6 / 0 | 14.3% | -1.96% | -$139 | 16.1d | May 26, 2026 → Jun 26, 2026 |
| v8 | 1 | 0 / 1 / 0 | 0% | -8.08% | -$210 | 5d | Jun 5, 2026 → Jun 10, 2026 |
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Pyramid add-on fired at +10.10% unrealized. Added 2 sh @ $274.31 ($548.62). Position now 6 sh @ weighted avg $257.54.
Wanted to buy but only $96.66 cash available; close=$399.49.
PAYC is a well-established HCM/payroll SaaS company with historically strong fundamentals (high recurring revenue, solid margins), so the 14.7% drop from its 30-day high does not appear explained by a confirmed fundamental impairment — no negative news, no recent SEC filings, and no insider sales are present in the window. The sector context is mildly supportive: Industrials (XLI) ranks 3rd of 11 by 30-day relative strength and has outperformed SPY meaningfully (+6.16pts over 30d), suggesting the dip is more idiosyncratic than sector-driven, which warrants some caution but also implies potential catch-up. Macro backdrop is mixed — VIX at the 73rd percentile introduces moderate uncertainty, the 10Y at 4.40% is a modest headwind for a growth-oriented SaaS name, but inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.1σ below trend) are benign and could be supportive of long-duration assets.
ORCL is fundamentally sound — the most recent 10-Q shows strong EPS of $3.15, net income of $9B, operating cash flow of $14.7B, and $10.8B in cash, reflecting a robust business. However, the 39.1% drop from the 30-day high ($250.25 → $152.46) is exceptionally large and lacks an identifiable confirmed catalyst from available news or filings; the recent headlines are entirely unrelated to ORCL. This magnitude of decline without a clear fundamental explanation raises the possibility of a serious undisclosed negative catalyst (e.g., guidance cut, contract loss, or regulatory issue) that the sparse news coverage does not illuminate. At $152.46 the stock trades at roughly 86x the consensus forward EPS of $1.77, which is elevated even for a high-quality cloud/AI name, limiting the valuation support argument. No insider buying, no unusual call flow, and no analyst upgrade post-drop provide confirmation signals.
SMCI is down 40.4% from its 30-day high with virtually no informational signal to explain or contextualize the move — no news headlines, no meaningful SEC filing metrics, no insider buying, and no options flow data. The Information Technology sector has shown mixed relative strength (rank 5/11, negative 5-day but positive 30-day vs. SPY), suggesting the drop may be partly idiosyncratic rather than purely sector-driven. Without a confirmed fundamental catalyst for the decline, the company's underlying business (AI server infrastructure) remains strategically relevant, but the sheer magnitude of the drop (40.4%) without any visible recovery signals or insider conviction is deeply concerning and suggests lingering company-specific headwinds (potentially related to SMCI's well-documented prior accounting and audit issues).
Intuit is a high-quality, cash-generative software business (TurboTax, QuickBooks, Credit Karma) with durable competitive moats, making the company fundamentally sound. However, a 36.9% drop from the 30-day high is an unusually large decline with no news headlines or insider buying to explain or support the move — the absence of cluster insider buys on such a steep dip is a meaningful negative signal. Options flow is muted and below average in both calls and puts (z-scores near -1), providing no confirmation of informed buying interest, and the sector is middling (rank 5 of 11) with recent tech weakness (QQQ -1.38% today).
ENPH is down 36% from its 30-day high with no news headlines, no insider buying, and no identifiable positive catalysts to explain the drop or support a recovery. The options flow shows below-average volume on both calls and puts (both z-scores negative), suggesting low conviction from options traders rather than informed buying interest. The macro backdrop is challenging for a long-duration solar/clean-energy tech name: QQQ is down 3.29% today, the broader tech sector is underperforming SPY, and the 10Y yield at 4.51% is a structural headwind for high-multiple growth stocks like ENPH. The two 8-K filings contain no financial metrics, providing no fundamental clarity.
Wanted to buy but only $96.66 cash available; close=$285.43.
ACN dropped ~35% from its 30-day high on the back of a confirmed Q3 revenue miss, a forward guidance cut, and multiple large cybersecurity acquisitions (Dragos, runZero, NetRise) that raise near-term margin and integration concerns — these are genuine, lasting fundamental negatives, not merely macro noise. The stock is dipping while its sector (XLK) is outperforming SPY significantly (+10.83pts over 30d), confirming this is idiosyncratic negative pressure rather than a broad IT sector selloff. Options flow is highly unusual on both sides (call z=4.21, put z=6.70), with puts more elevated, suggesting hedging dominates over informed dip-buying; the elevated put flow is a meaningful risk discount signal. Insider activity is limited to routine equity awards (no open-market purchases), providing no incremental bullish confirmation post-drop.
TEAM (Atlassian) is a fundamentally sound enterprise software company with a strong recurring revenue model and competitive moat in collaboration/DevOps tooling. However, the 34% drop from the 30-day high is severe and unexplained by available evidence — no news, no filings, and no options flow data to diagnose the cause or confirm a floor. The insider activity is a clear negative signal: the CRO executed five consecutive days of sales totaling ~7,700 shares (~$845K) right during the decline, which is directionally bearish even if potentially 10b5-1 plan-related. The sector (IT/XLK) has modest 30-day outperformance vs. SPY (+4.2pts), suggesting TEAM's drop may be idiosyncratic rather than sector-driven, which requires more caution without a known catalyst for recovery.
ON Semiconductor (ON) is down 32.8% from its 30-day high with no visible fundamental catalyst to explain the drop — no negative earnings reports, no guidance cuts, no SEC filings, and no insider selling in the window. The sector (XLK) has shown 30-day relative strength vs. SPY (+4.20pts), suggesting this is likely an idiosyncratic move rather than a broad tech selloff, which warrants some caution about stock-specific risk. However, ON is a fundamentally sound semiconductor company with exposure to EV/industrial end markets, and a ~33% dip without a confirmed negative catalyst creates potential mean-reversion opportunity. The macro backdrop is modestly supportive with inflation expectations below trend (T10YIE at 2.2, 2.1σ below trend) and a non-inverted yield curve, though VIX at the 73rd percentile introduces moderate uncertainty.
ALB (Albemarle) is down 32.5% from its 30-day high — an unusually severe drawdown. The Materials sector (XLB) has been slightly outperforming SPY on both 5d and 30d bases, suggesting this drop is idiosyncratic to ALB rather than sector-wide, which raises concern about company-specific headwinds. There are no insider cluster buys, no positive analyst catalysts visible, and the 8-K filed June 5 provides no disclosed metrics to clarify the cause of the drop. Options flow shows elevated put volume (z=+1.61) alongside unremarkable call volume (z=-0.44), with a P/C ratio of 0.76 — a mildly bearish skew. Lithium pricing remains under secular pressure, and ALB's earnings power is highly sensitive to spot lithium carbonate prices, which have been depressed.
HPE is down 32% from its 30-day high, a very sharp move with no identifiable negative catalyst in the news or SEC filings — the 10-Q and 8-K filed in early June contain no disclosed metrics suggesting fundamental impairment. The options flow shows a low P/C ratio of 0.35 with call volume exceeding put volume roughly 3:1, which is a mildly bullish signal on the dip. However, there are no insider cluster buys, no analyst upgrades, and no clear positive catalyst. The drop is large and idiosyncratic relative to the IT sector (which has positive 30d relative strength vs SPY), suggesting company-specific pressure rather than a sector-wide selloff, which warrants caution about an unconfirmed fundamental issue.
[not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] AKAM is down 31.8% from its 30-day high with no confirmed fundamental impairment — no negative news headlines, no adverse SEC filings, and no imminent earnings catalyst to explain the severity of the drop. The options flow is bullish-skewed with a P/C ratio of 0.50 and call z-score of +0.71, suggesting moderate informed buying interest. The IT sector (XLK) is outperforming SPY meaningfully (+5.87pts over 30d), which flags this as an idiosyncratic dip rather than a sector-wide selloff — raising the possibility of an overreaction or technical unwind rather than a structural breakdown. Akamai is a mature, cash-generative CDN/security business with a solid balance sheet, and at ~$113 the valuation is likely historically compressed relative to its own history.
CTSH has dropped 32.1% from its 30-day high to $39.15, a severe move that is not explained by any confirmed macro or sector-wide collapse — IT/XLK is actually outperforming SPY by +5.87pts over 30 days, indicating this is idiosyncratic weakness rather than sector rotation. The 8-K filed June 3 covers an undisclosed event, and the absence of meaningful news headlines or fundamental data makes the catalyst unclear but potentially company-specific and material. The options flow on June 25 shows a P/C ratio of 1.97 with put volume nearly double call volume (z=+0.50 puts vs z=-0.20 calls), signaling net bearish sentiment rather than informed dip-buying. Insider activity is minimal — one director exercised options and had shares withheld for taxes, which is a neutral/slightly negative signal, not a cluster buy. No upcoming earnings are visible, removing binary event risk, but the lack of any positive confirmation signals (no analyst upgrades, no unusual call volume, no insider cluster buys) combined with the idiosyncratic nature of the drop in a strong sector environment keeps confidence low.
ServiceNow (NOW) is a fundamentally strong enterprise SaaS platform with durable revenue streams and consistent growth, so the underlying business is sound. However, the 29.4% drop from its 30-day high is steep and lacks any explanatory evidence — no news headlines, no SEC filings, no insider activity, and no options flow data are available to contextualize the move. The IT sector (XLK) is showing mixed signals: 30-day relative strength is positive vs. SPY (+4.20pts) but recent 5-day underperformance (-3.02pts vs SPY) and today's heavy negative flow proxy (-$46M) suggest near-term sector headwinds, including a QQQ decline of -1.38% today. With VIX at the 73rd percentile and the 10Y at 4.40%, long-duration growth stocks like NOW face moderate macro headwinds, though the low inflation breakeven (T10YIE at 2.1σ below trend) could eventually be favorable for rate-sensitive names.
CME Group is a fundamentally sound exchange operator with durable revenue from derivatives trading — elevated VIX environments historically benefit CME's volumes. However, the 24.8% drop from the 30-day high is unusually large for a business of this quality, with no explanatory news headlines, no insider buying activity, and no clear positive catalyst visible. The options flow shows highly unusual put volume (z=3.45) on the most recent trading day with a P/C ratio above 1.0, which is a meaningful bearish signal on a dip — while it could be hedging, the magnitude of the put spike warrants caution. The Financials sector is actually outperforming SPY meaningfully (+5.78pts over 30 days), suggesting this is an idiosyncratic drop in CME rather than a sector-wide move, which requires identifying a company-specific cause that is conspicuously absent from the evidence.
[not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] Wanted to buy but only $261.77 cash available; close=$463.93.
FOXA is down 28.7% from its 30-day high with no clear fundamental catalyst visible in the evidence — no earnings miss, no guidance cut, no SEC filings explaining the drop. The options flow shows a healthy call/put ratio of 0.40 with below-average volumes (both call and put z-scores negative), suggesting neither strong bearish conviction nor unusual bullish accumulation. The Communication Services sector is underperforming SPY meaningfully (-4.65pts over 5 days), indicating FOXA's decline is at least partially sector-driven rather than purely idiosyncratic, which mildly supports a mean-reversion case. However, the absence of insider buying, no identifiable positive catalyst, and a sharp 28.7% drop without explanation raise concern that there may be an undisclosed fundamental driver not yet captured in our evidence window.
EPAM is down 27.6% from its 30-day high with no news headlines, no insider activity, and no clear fundamental catalyst identified — the cause of the drop is ambiguous, which is slightly neutral-to-bullish by default. However, options flow shows a P/C ratio of 1.14 with UNUSUAL call volume (z=2.01), a mild positive signal suggesting some informed buying interest at current levels. The macro environment is mixed: VIX at the 73rd percentile is modestly elevated but not alarming, the 2s10s spread is positive (+0.31pp), and falling inflation expectations (T10YIE 2.1σ below trend) are favorable for long-duration IT equities. EPAM's sector (XLK) has 30d outperformance vs SPY (+4.20pts), meaning this is an idiosyncratic drop rather than a sector-wide selloff, which raises concern about company-specific risk we cannot identify.
[not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] QCOM is down 27.1% from its 30-day high with no confirmed fundamental impairment visible in the evidence — no negative news headlines, no earnings miss, and no insider selling. The company remains a structurally sound semiconductor/wireless IP business with recurring licensing revenue. The 8-K filed June 24 lacks detail but does not signal a crisis event. The drop brings the stock to ~$189, likely at a historically attractive valuation relative to QCOM's typical trading range, and the sector (XLK) has actually shown 30-day outperformance vs. SPY (+4.20pts), suggesting this is more an idiosyncratic price dislocation than a sector-wide collapse — though the absence of a clear catalyst explanation warrants caution.
WDC has recovered significantly from the prior stop-out price ($516 → $586), suggesting the underlying storage demand thesis (boosted by Micron's $100B AI deal headline) has some legs. However, the 26.7% drop from the 30-day high of $799.87 is steep and came alongside a Fox Advisors downgrade (sentiment -0.40), which represents a confirmed negative analyst catalyst. No insider buying, no options flow data, and no earnings catalyst are available to provide confirmation signals. The sector (XLK) has moderate relative strength (+4.20pts vs SPY over 30d) but showed weakness today (-1.38% QQQ), so the drop appears partly idiosyncratic. VIX at the 73rd percentile and sticky inflation add modest macro headwinds.
ADBE is a fundamentally sound, high-margin software company (Creative Cloud/Document Cloud/Experience Cloud) with durable recurring revenue, and a 26.4% drop to ~$202 brings it to historically inexpensive territory for this franchise. Options flow is constructive — call volume significantly exceeds put volume (P/C ratio 0.46, put z-score negative), suggesting the options market is not positioned bearishly on this dip. Earnings are 73 days away, removing binary event risk from the 90-day trade window. However, the sector (XLK) has shown recent weakness (-3.02pts vs SPY over 5 days) and today's QQQ is down -1.38%, suggesting macro/tech headwinds are contributing, but insider activity consists only of routine option exercises and tax withholding (F-code sells), not cluster buying — providing no strong confirmation signal.
DOW Inc. is down 26.9% from its 30-day high with no identifiable company-specific fundamental catalyst in the news or SEC filings — the drop appears macro/sector-driven rather than due to confirmed earnings deterioration or guidance cuts. However, the Materials sector (XLB) is underperforming SPY meaningfully (-1.29pts over 30 days, ranked 8/11 by relative strength), suggesting sector-wide headwinds rather than idiosyncratic recovery. Options flow shows a modest call/put skew (P/C 0.58) with near-normal z-scores on both sides, offering no strong confirmation of informed buying. There are no insider purchases, no near-term earnings catalyst (120 days out), and the broader commodity complex is weak today (USO -4.47%, GLD -3.02%), which is structurally negative for a basic materials/chemical company like DOW.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Nothing on the watchlist right now.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Palantir and Nvidia Bring Open AI Models Inside U.S. Government Systems
This Little-Known Company Sinks After Securing $11 Million in Nvidia Blackwell AI Servers
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Alphabet shares jump after joining Dow Jones Industrial Average
Alphabet shares jump after joining Dow Jones Industrial Average
Citi Just Slapped a Massive $2,500 Price Target on SanDisk. Here’s Why They’re So Bullish
VZ, T, TMUS Shares Under Pressure — SpaceX's Starlink Mobile Service Push Rattles Telecom Stocks
ServiceNow’s New IBM Partnership: A Real Catalyst, or Just Software-Selloff Noise?
ServiceNow’s New IBM Partnership: A Real Catalyst, or Just Software-Selloff Noise?
Is International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) A Good Stock To Buy Now?
Bitcoin ETFs see worst month of outflows as investors pile into AI trade
New AI Cold War?! Did Google Really ‘Throttle’ Zuckerberg’s AI Access?
New AI Cold War?! Did Google Really ‘Throttle’ Zuckerberg’s AI Access?
New AI Cold War?! Did Google Really ‘Throttle’ Zuckerberg’s AI Access?
Here's My Favorite Gold Investment With Its Price Down to $4,000 an Ounce
Alphabet Adds $168 Billion on Dow Debut as Indexes Shake Off Volatility
Alphabet Adds $168 Billion on Dow Debut as Indexes Shake Off Volatility
This CIO Says the AI Bubble Pops the Moment Good News Stops Moving Stocks
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
- Jun 29, 12:33 PMpolicy · severity 3/5
US Strategic Petroleum Reserve hits lowest level since 1983, affecting crude oil prices.
- Jun 29, 10:27 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Kalshi traders predict upcoming jobs report will miss Wall Street consensus expectations.
- Jun 29, 7:40 AMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
U.S. envoys Kushner and Witkoff to meet Iran in Doha negotiations.
- Jun 29, 6:24 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
US-Iran de-escalation channels established ahead of diplomatic talks.
- Jun 29, 5:01 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
EU's MiCA deadline threatens unlicensed crypto firms with regulatory wipeout.
- Jun 29, 3:06 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Middle East oil and LNG producers maintain operations despite maritime security threats.
- Jun 29, 1:19 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
South Korea commits $518 billion to AI chips, outpacing crypto sector investment.
- Jun 29, 1:03 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Bitcoin declines to $59,700 as Iran tensions ease, benefiting equities over crypto.
- Jun 29, 12:31 AMpolicy · severity 4/5
BIS warns AI investment surge poses systemic financial risk via leveraged debt structures.
- Jun 29, 12:02 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Iranian cyberattacks on Israel escalated in 2026, raising regional security concerns.
- Jun 28, 9:56 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
US-Iran strikes lift oil prices while Fed rate hike expectations weigh on gold.
- Jun 28, 9:48 PMpolicy · severity 4/5
BOJ aligns monetary policy with Japanese government's economic growth targets.
- Jun 28, 9:22 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
China blacklists 20 Japanese entities in dual-use export restrictions; normal trade unaffected.
- Jun 28, 8:40 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
US-Iran tensions ease temporarily; oil rallies while equities remain choppy.
- Jun 28, 8:31 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Iran tensions and Fed rate outlook impact Indian rupee and bond markets.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
- Jun 29, 6:05 AM[stage] 121 trigger(s) [75 cached, 46 Claude], 17 bought, 104 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 78 watch-listed. Exits: 1. (staged 0 open / 1 close intent to pending_orders)
- Jun 26, 8:52 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 26, 8:38 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 26, 6:02 AM[stage] 121 trigger(s) [93 cached, 28 Claude], 17 bought, 104 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 80 watch-listed. Exits: 2. (staged 0 open / 0 close intents to pending_orders)
- Jun 25, 12:36 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 25, 6:03 AM[stage] 118 trigger(s) [117 cached, 1 Claude], 14 bought, 104 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 82 watch-listed. Exits: 0. (staged 0 open / 0 close intents to pending_orders)
- Jun 24, 5:05 PM118 trigger(s) [94 cached, 24 Claude], 14 bought, 104 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 82 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Jun 24, 12:59 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 24, 6:03 AM[stage] 117 trigger(s) [81 cached, 36 Claude], 19 bought, 98 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 86 watch-listed. Exits: 1. (staged 19 open / 1 close intents to pending_orders)
- Jun 23, 10:34 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 23, 8:56 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 23, 6:04 AM[stage] 122 trigger(s) [122 cached, 0 Claude], 17 bought, 105 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 88 watch-listed. Exits: 0. (staged 2 open / 0 close intents to pending_orders)
- Jun 22, 5:05 PM124 trigger(s) [85 cached, 39 Claude], 16 bought, 108 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 88 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Jun 22, 9:31 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 22, 6:05 AM[stage] 112 trigger(s) [111 cached, 1 Claude], 15 bought, 97 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 78 watch-listed. Exits: 0. (staged 0 open / 0 close intents to pending_orders)
- Jun 18, 5:04 PM119 trigger(s) [85 cached, 34 Claude], 18 bought, 101 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 80 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Jun 18, 8:47 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 18, 8:37 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 18, 6:03 AM[stage] 126 trigger(s) [123 cached, 3 Claude], 14 bought, 112 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 82 watch-listed. Exits: 0. (staged 0 open / 0 close intents to pending_orders)
- Jun 17, 5:04 PM127 trigger(s) [65 cached, 62 Claude], 17 bought, 110 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 84 watch-listed. Exits: 4.