Scorecard
Head to head
Peer-aware evolving vs. solo evolving
Open Positions
(47)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
Open Positions
(47)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
- 2 sh × $467.00 ($934 cost)$467.00$934+$0.00+0.00%
- 8 sh × $143.13 ($1,145 cost)$143.97$1,152+$6.68+0.58%
- 1 sh × $807.19 ($807 cost)$817.61$818+$10.42+1.29%
- 3 sh × $297.94 ($894 cost)$277.32$832−$61.86−6.92%
- 2 sh × $453.90 ($908 cost)$428.41$857−$50.99−5.62%
- 10 sh × $110.77 ($1,108 cost)$106.64$1,066−$41.30−3.73%
- 45 sh × $36.70 ($1,652 cost)$37.03$1,666+$14.85+0.90%
- 4 sh × $215.84 ($863 cost)$237.96$952+$88.46+10.25%
- 12 sh × $95.95 ($1,151 cost)$97.33$1,168+$16.62+1.44%
- 3 sh × $372.04 ($1,116 cost)$346.25$1,039−$77.38−6.93%
- 18 sh × $99.04 ($1,783 cost)$98.63$1,775−$7.47−0.42%
- 5 sh × $221.17 ($1,106 cost)$222.93$1,115+$8.83+0.80%
- 4 sh × $293.76 ($1,175 cost)$280.89$1,124−$51.48−4.38%
- 36 sh × $49.93 ($1,798 cost)$56.74$2,043+$245.10+13.64%
- 24 sh × $67.06 ($1,609 cost)$64.43$1,546−$63.12−3.92%
- 4 sh × $344.70 ($1,379 cost)$336.31$1,345−$33.58−2.44%
- 1 sh × $1,155.29 ($1,155 cost)$1,141.05$1,141−$14.24−1.23%
- 2 sh × $603.00 ($1,206 cost)$621.65$1,243+$37.30+3.09%
- 22 sh × $141.15 ($3,105 cost)$145.84$3,208+$103.06+3.32%
- 5 sh × $255.72 ($1,279 cost)$254.94$1,275−$3.90−0.31%
- 4 sh × $309.90 ($1,240 cost)$334.54$1,338+$98.58+7.95%
- 3 sh × $362.81 ($1,088 cost)$339.72$1,019−$69.27−6.36%
- 27 sh × $43.33 ($1,170 cost)$40.78$1,101−$68.98−5.90%
- 5 sh × $248.36 ($1,242 cost)$254.12$1,271+$28.80+2.32%
- 1 sh × $912.53 ($913 cost)$929.73$930+$17.20+1.88%
- 12 sh × $93.05 ($1,117 cost)$95.90$1,151+$34.26+3.07%
- 10 sh × $164.01 ($1,640 cost)$181.58$1,816+$175.75+10.72%
- 3 sh × $575.34 ($1,726 cost)$665.81$1,997+$271.42+15.73%
- 2 sh × $490.25 ($981 cost)$464.09$928−$52.32−5.34%
- 1 sh × $84.79 ($85 cost)$85.28$85+$0.49+0.58%
- 1 sh × $61.84 ($62 cost)$69.53$70+$7.69+12.44%
- 1 sh × $782.64 ($783 cost)$787.30$787+$4.66+0.60%
- 3 sh × $365.83 ($1,097 cost)$364.46$1,093−$4.12−0.38%
- 6 sh × $472.79 ($2,837 cost)$497.02$2,982+$145.35+5.12%
- 2 sh × $133.11 ($266 cost)$134.44$269+$2.66+1.00%
- 25 sh × $65.70 ($1,643 cost)$64.00$1,600−$42.74−2.60%
- 28 sh × $74.58 ($2,088 cost)$74.50$2,086−$2.24−0.11%
- 2 sh × $57.54 ($115 cost)$60.63$121+$6.19+5.38%
- 12 sh × $213.56 ($2,563 cost)$208.47$2,502−$61.04−2.38%
- 7 sh × $14.64 ($103 cost)$13.89$97−$5.28−5.15%
- 7 sh × $355.33 ($2,487 cost)$375.10$2,626+$138.42+5.57%
- 6 sh × $243.33 ($1,460 cost)$234.44$1,407−$53.34−3.65%
- 2 sh × $30.26 ($61 cost)$31.61$63+$2.70+4.46%
- 1 sh × $52.33 ($52 cost)$51.58$52−$0.75−1.43%
- 1 sh × $113.82 ($114 cost)$111.26$111−$2.56−2.25%
- 1 sh × $49.39 ($49 cost)$52.23$52+$2.84+5.75%
- 4 sh × $377.69 ($1,511 cost)$507.20$2,029+$518.02+34.29%
Closed Positions
(245)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
Closed Positions
(245)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
How this agent thinks
Plain English. Skip the jargon, read this first.
Identical to Agent V at day 0 — same -10%-from-30-day-high trigger, same evidence packet, same sizing, same three exits (recover, -8% stop, 90-day time stop). It also inherits Agent V's v3 features — pyramiding on +10% winners, and re-entry on previously-stopped tickers that have recovered. The one peer-aware difference: each time it asks Claude whether a dip is worth buying, the prompt includes a snapshot of how every other agent is currently performing. The hypothesis: knowing that peers are crowded into a sector (or short it) gives Claude useful situational awareness that improves the call. The risk: the LLM gets competitive, takes more aggressive positions to 'beat' peers, or herd-follows the strongest performer. The prompt explicitly tells Claude this is information, not motivation. At day 365 we compare V (no peer context) to VIII (peer context) to see which side of that hypothesis wins.
Universe: S&P 500 starter set (same as Agents IV and V) · Capital: $100,000
Prompt performance
Closed-position stats broken out by the prompt version that authored each buy.
| Prompt | Trades | W / L / S | Win rate | Avg P/L % | Total P/L | Avg hold | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 34 | 31 / 3 / 0 | 91.2% | +8.79% | +$859 | 46.8d | May 15, 2026 → Aug 24, 2026 |
| v6 | 175 | 112 / 61 / 2 | 64.7% | +7.08% | +$8,193 | 35.4d | May 18, 2026 → Sep 14, 2026 |
| v7 | 26 | 17 / 9 / 0 | 65.4% | +12.58% | +$3,520 | 58.6d | May 26, 2026 → Aug 27, 2026 |
| v8 | 3 | 2 / 1 / 0 | 66.7% | +7.4% | -$143 | 50.7d | Jun 1, 2026 → Aug 24, 2026 |
| v9+rec18 | 7 | 1 / 6 / 0 | 14.3% | -7% | -$645 | 6.6d | Aug 6, 2026 → Sep 14, 2026 |
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
SNPS is down ~14.9% from its 30-day high, a meaningful but not extreme dip for a fundamentally sound EDA/IP software company. However, the dominant risk factor here is imminent earnings in 3 days (2026-09-07), which creates a binary event that could extend losses or accelerate recovery unpredictably. A recent headline flagging that SNPS's "core engine grew far slower than its revenue" raises a structural concern about quality of growth, suggesting the sell-off may not be a pure overreaction. Wall Street consensus is bullish (50% upside target), but analyst targets often lag fundamental deterioration signals. No insider buying or unusual call flow provides confirmation of a bottom.
DD (DuPont) is down 10.4% from its 30-day high with no news headlines, no confirmed fundamental impairment, and sparse SEC filing metrics — suggesting the drop may be macro/sector-driven rather than company-specific. The Materials sector (XLB) is ranked mid-tier (4 of 11) with a modest 30-day outperformance vs SPY (+1.74pts), but recent 5-day weakness (-1.15pts) and negative sector flow (-679K) suggest near-term headwinds. The single insider grant (not a purchase) by Director Breen provides minimal signal. Earnings are 65 days away, removing binary event risk for the 90-day window.
HST (Host Hotels & Resorts) is a large-cap lodging REIT that appears fundamentally sound, but the evidence for a near-term rebound is weak. The Real Estate sector (XLRE) is the second-worst performer by 30-day relative strength (rank 10 of 11), down nearly 8 points vs. SPY over 30 days, suggesting this dip is largely sector-driven with no idiosyncratic recovery catalyst. The 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above trend, which is a structural headwind for rate-sensitive REITs given the 10Y yield at 4.65%. Options flow is muted and slightly put-heavy (P/C 1.36, both volumes below average z-scores), and there is no insider buying, no positive news, and no analyst catalyst to anchor a bullish thesis.
PARA is down 50.6% from its 30-day high, trading at $0.99 — a sub-$1 penny stock territory. Applying the anomalous drop triage protocol: there are no headlines, no SEC filings, no insider activity, and no options flow to confirm or explain the collapse. At $0.99 with a consensus EPS of -$6.26 for the next earnings print, the company appears fundamentally impaired. The sector (XLC) is underperforming SPY meaningfully (-1.85pts on 30d basis), and the broad market tone today is risk-off with SPY -0.59% and VXX +3.28%. The complete absence of any confirming evidence (no insider buys, no unusual call flow, no news of a catalyst) makes this either a data artifact or a genuine fundamental collapse — neither of which supports a dip-buy thesis. A deeply loss-making company trading below $1 with no confirmatory signals has no identifiable recovery catalyst for a large rebound.
BURL is down 36.8% from its 30-day high — triggering the anomalous drop triage protocol. There are zero confirming headlines, no credible news, and the 10-Q/8-K filings carry empty metrics, providing no fundamental explanation for a collapse of this magnitude in a large-cap off-price retailer. The most likely explanation is a data artifact (split, spin-off, or adjustment), which means the apparent "dip" is not a genuine buying opportunity. Even setting aside the artifact hypothesis, there is no insider cluster buying, no unusual call flow (P/C ratio of 1.15 is modestly put-heavy), no analyst upgrade, and no identifiable recovery catalyst. Sector context (Consumer Discretionary ranked 4th, modestly underperforming SPY) does not explain a drop of this size.
The 30.6% drop is confirmed as real and fundamental: COO missed Q3 revenue estimates due to destocking, failed to sell CooperSurgical at an attractive valuation (a strategic overhang), received multiple analyst downgrades, and is heading for a 52-week low with analysts citing "limited near-term appeal." The options flow is extremely bearish — put volume z-score of 72.82 is extraordinary, with a P/C ratio of 1.59, signaling strong directional bearishness rather than mere hedging. No insider buying has occurred post-drop, removing a key confirmation signal. The macro backdrop is hostile (10Y at 4.80%, elevated inflation expectations, broad market sell-off with oil spiking and yields at 19-year highs), and the healthcare sector is underperforming SPY on both 5-day and 30-day horizons.
TPR (Tapestry) is down 31% from its 30-day high, a significant but sub-35% drop that warrants full analysis. The drop magnitude is notable, but no confirming news or SEC filing metrics explain a fundamental collapse — the 8-K and 10-K filed in August lack extracted metrics, and the sole news headline shows Tapestry "holding steady" while a peer surged. This suggests the drop may be partly sector-driven (Consumer Discretionary ranked 4th of 11, underperforming SPY on both 5d and 30d basis) and partly idiosyncratic. However, there are no confirmation signals: no insider cluster buys, no unusual call flow, and no analyst upgrade post-drop. With earnings 56 days away (non-imminent), that risk is manageable, but the elevated 10Y yield (4.78%) is a structural headwind for consumer discretionary. The macro backdrop — elevated forward inflation expectations (T5YIFR 1.8σ above trend), negative sector flows, and a softening broad market — limits near-term recovery potential. Without a clear identifiable catalyst for a large rebound (>50%), this setup lacks the asymmetric profile the strategy targets.
The 22.7% drop is confirmed by multiple negative news catalysts: BMO is bearish on athletic names, analysts note LULU faces a "bleak outlook" with potential for further downside, and competitive pressures are explicitly cited. The drop is not a data artifact — it reflects genuine fundamental deterioration in the form of brand erosion, competitive challenges (vs. Nike and others), and a weak consumer discretionary sector environment. Sector context is also unfavorable: XLY is underperforming SPY on both 5d and 30d bases, suggesting no near-term tailwind. There are no confirmation signals — no insider buying, no unusual call flow, and no analyst upgrades post-drop — and the 10Y at 4.78% is a structural headwind for a premium-priced consumer discretionary name trading around $100.
NCLH is down 30.1% from its 30-day high, which is a significant but sub-35% drop, so the anomalous drop triage protocol is not triggered. However, the decline is being driven by a combination of sector-wide headwinds (rising oil prices undercutting fuel-cost relief hopes, Carnival down 16% in a month, Royal Caribbean also trailing) and a structurally challenging macro backdrop: 10Y yields at 4.78% are a meaningful headwind for a heavily leveraged cruise operator that carries substantial debt. The sector is underperforming SPY over both 5d and 30d periods, today's broad-market tone is risk-off (VIX elevated, USO +2.70% amplifying fuel cost concerns), and there are no confirmation signals — no insider buying, no unusual call flow, and the 10-Q filed in August showed empty metrics. The rebound potential appears capped by the twin structural headwinds of high fuel costs and high interest rates, both of which directly compress NCLH's thin margins and weigh on its debt-laden balance sheet. Earnings are 54 days out (non-factor), but the consensus EPS of $0.92 could face downside risk if oil remains elevated.
XRAY (Dentsply Sirona) is down 24.2% from its 30-day high with no news headlines, no insider buying, no options flow, and 10-Q/8-K filings with empty metrics — leaving the cause of the drop entirely unexplained. The Health Care sector is a relative outperformer (rank 3/11, +1.23pts vs SPY over 30d), meaning this is an idiosyncratic drop rather than sector-driven selling, which raises concern about unconfirmed company-specific deterioration. With no confirmation signals (no insider cluster buys, no unusual call flow, no analyst catalysts) and no visibility into fundamentals from the empty SEC filing metrics, there is insufficient evidence to characterize this as a clear overreaction with identifiable recovery catalyst.
WHR is down 15.1% from its 30-day high with no news headlines or 8-K disclosures explaining the drop, suggesting a macro/sector-driven selloff rather than a confirmed fundamental impairment. The sole insider event is a grant (Form 4 'G' code) of 40,000 shares at $0 to the Chairman/CEO — this is a compensation award, not an open-market purchase, providing no meaningful bullish confirmation signal. Earnings are 52 days away (non-factor), VIX is very low (14.32, 2nd percentile), and the Consumer Discretionary sector has modest positive relative strength, but WHR is a rate-sensitive, capital-intensive appliance maker facing a structural headwind from the elevated 10Y yield (4.79%) and a T5YIFR reading 1.7σ above trend. With empty 10-Q metrics and no confirming signals (no call flow, no cluster buys, no analyst upgrades), the setup lacks the asymmetric conviction profile needed for a high-probability dip buy.
PCG is a regulated California utility (PG&E), which is fundamentally sound post-bankruptcy reorganization with stable regulated cash flows. However, the 22.8% drop has no identifiable catalyst — no news, no SEC filings, no insider buying, and no options flow to explain or confirm the move. The utilities sector is the worst-performing sector on 30-day relative strength (rank 11/11, -8.52pts vs SPY), suggesting broad sector-wide selling is the primary driver. With elevated 10Y yields at 4.78% and 5Y forward inflation running 1.8σ above trend, rate-sensitive utilities face a structural headwind. There are no confirmation signals (no insider cluster buys, no unusual call flow) to suggest an overreaction with imminent recovery catalyst, and the large-rebound profile required for this strategy is not evident in a regulated utility trading near $14.
CCL is down 20.6% from its 30-day high, a significant but not anomalous drop for a cruise operator facing macro headwinds. The Iranian War "tax" headline (now 6 months in) suggests an ongoing geopolitical drag on energy costs and travel sentiment, which is a real but not necessarily permanent impairment. Sentiment is mixed — one bearish analyst piece ("cruise is too slow") and one bullish ("cheap enough to hop on") — suggesting genuine valuation debate rather than confirmed deterioration. Options flow skews bearish (P/C ratio 1.41, put volume z=+0.76 vs. call volume z=-0.36), and there is no insider buying to provide conviction. Earnings are 28 days away (elevated caution zone), with consensus EPS of $1.37, creating binary risk before a potential recovery.
AXON is down 24.8% from its 30-day high, and the lone headline explicitly notes the drop is "not entirely the business's fault," suggesting some exogenous/macro component. However, the evidence for a large rebound is thin: insider activity is exclusively sales (President Isner sold across multiple transactions on 8/31), options flow is muted and near-neutral with a P/C ratio slightly above 1.0 (both call and put volumes below normal z-scores), and the Industrials sector is ranked 10th of 11 by 30-day relative strength with significant negative flow. The 10-Q metrics are empty, providing no fundamental anchor. The macro backdrop features elevated 10Y yields (4.78%) and rising forward inflation expectations (T5YIFR 1.8σ above trend), which are structural headwinds for a high-multiple growth stock like AXON. Earnings are 54 days out — not imminent, but the consensus EPS of $1.98 introduces a binary risk event within the 90-day window.
SEE (Sealed Air) is down 18.1% from its 30-day high to $4.42, which is a notable dip for a materials/packaging company, but there are no confirming signals to explain or support a recovery thesis. The evidence set is almost entirely empty — no news headlines, no SEC filings, no insider activity, and no options flow — making it impossible to distinguish between a temporary overreaction and a genuine fundamental deterioration. The Materials sector holds a moderate relative-strength rank (3 of 11) with slightly positive 30-day outperformance vs. SPY, suggesting the dip is idiosyncratic rather than sector-driven, which increases concern about company-specific risk. Earnings are 61 days away (non-factor), VIX is low (16.34, 30th percentile), and the macro backdrop is benign but yields remain elevated (10Y at 4.75%), which is a structural headwind for capital-intensive industrials/materials names.
RCL is down 19.5% from its 30-day high, a notable but not extreme dip for a major cruise line. The drop does not appear tied to confirmed fundamental impairment — no negative earnings revision, no guidance cut, and no company-specific adverse news is evident in the filings or headlines. Earnings are 56 days away (non-factor), VIX is at a very low 14.43 (2nd percentile), and the macro environment is benign for risk assets. However, consumer discretionary (XLY) is underperforming SPY on both 5-day and 30-day bases (ranked 7/11), suggesting sector-level headwinds are contributing to the dip. There are no insider buys, no unusual call flow, and no confirmation signals to indicate informed accumulation — the setup lacks the high-conviction triggers that have driven the agent's large winners.
NRG is down 22.6% from its 30-day high, a meaningful drop, but the sector context is deeply unfavorable: Utilities (XLU) ranks dead last (11 of 11) in 30-day relative strength, with a -8.13pt 30d underperformance vs. SPY and strongly negative today's flow proxy (-1.97M). The drop appears largely sector-driven rather than idiosyncratic, meaning there is no clear company-specific overreaction catalyst to trigger a snapback. The lone news headline references a competitor (Vistra), not NRG directly, and there are no insider buys, no unusual call flow, and no recent SEC filings to provide fundamental grounding or confirmation signals.
AAL is down 24.3% from its 30-day high, driven by a genuine and persistent sector headwind: the Iran war is sending jet fuel costs sharply higher, and the A4A CEO explicitly states airlines are "eating the cost" — a confirmed margin compression catalyst, not a transient blip. The sector (Industrials/XLI) ranks 9th of 11 by 30-day relative strength, underperforming SPY by over 5pts in 30 days, and today's broad market is risk-off (USO +5.46% compounding the fuel cost problem). Consensus EPS for next quarter is already negative at -$0.24, suggesting analysts anticipate continued losses, and there is no insider buying, no unusual call flow, and no identifiable recovery catalyst within the 90-day window that would drive a large rebound.
WDC is down 23.6% from its 30-day high — a meaningful but not extreme dip — with no confirmed fundamental impairment. Headlines point to AI-driven HDD demand outpacing supply through 2027 and secured business through 2028, suggesting the thesis is intact. However, the IT sector is outperforming (rank 2 of 11, +3.75pts vs SPY over 30 days), which means WDC is dropping idiosyncratically against a strong sector backdrop — a warning sign of stock-specific pressure. One analyst note flags the current price as already pricing in a lot of the story, limiting large-rebound potential. Insider activity is mixed: insiders received awards and exercised options but also had shares withheld for taxes (F transactions), with no cluster of open-market purchases — not a confirmation signal. Earnings are 44 days away (non-factor). The macro environment is modestly hostile today (SPY -0.59%, QQQ -1.14%, high 10Y yield at 4.95%), and the DRAM sector faces continued ETF outflows.
APTV is down ~23% from its 30-day high, which is a meaningful but not catastrophic dip. The analyst headline suggesting ~39% undervaluation and the Nvidia tie-up narrative provide a plausible positive catalyst, while the options flow is constructive (P/C of 0.47, call volume meaningfully exceeding puts with no unusual put-side alarm). However, the evidence base is thin: the 10-Q metrics are empty, insider activity is absent (no cluster buy confirmation), and earnings are 50 days out (non-factor but a binary risk on the horizon). The 10Y yield at 4.77% is a structural headwind for an auto-tech supplier already under margin pressure, and the sector (Consumer Discretionary) is middling in relative strength. The Nvidia partnership angle is speculative and not yet quantified. Without confirmed fundamental impairment but also without strong confirmation signals, this sits in the weak/neutral evidence band with a plausible but unconfirmed rebound path.
TJX is a fundamentally strong off-price retailer with a durable business model and consistent free cash flow generation; a 14.1% drop from its 30-day high is notable but not catastrophic. However, the evidence base is thin: no news headlines, no insider buying, no options flow, and only a sparse 8-K filing with no metrics. Without a clear overreaction narrative or identifiable recovery catalyst, this looks more like a stock caught in sector-wide softness (Consumer Discretionary ranked 5th, slightly underperforming SPY on both 5d and 30d) than a high-conviction mispriced dip. The macro backdrop — 10Y at 4.65% and T5YIFR elevated — creates a modest structural headwind for discretionary consumer spending.
DECK (Deckers Outdoor) is down ~19.6% from its 30-day high, a meaningful but not catastrophic dip. The drop appears macro/sector-driven rather than company-specific — news headlines cite broad consumer discretionary weakness tied to weak Michigan consumer sentiment and negative guidance from peers (e.l.f Beauty, Amazon), not DECK-specific deterioration. Insider activity consists entirely of tax withholding forfeitures (Form F transactions at $0), not open-market sales or purchases, which is neutral. Options flow shows a P/C ratio of 0.65 with below-average volumes (both calls and puts negative z-scores), suggesting no strong directional conviction either way. Earnings are 57 days out, reducing near-term binary risk meaningfully. However, the 10-Q filed July 30 has no disclosed metrics, limiting fundamental visibility, and the 10Y at 4.74% is a structural headwind for discretionary names.
LUV is down ~18.9% from its 30-day high with no clear company-specific negative catalyst visible — the 8-K filings and board appointments suggest routine corporate activity rather than a fundamental deterioration. The Industrials sector is underperforming SPY meaningfully (−4.16pts over 30d, ranked 8 of 11), suggesting this is largely a sector-driven dip rather than idiosyncratic company impairment, which is somewhat supportive. However, confirmation signals are entirely absent: no insider cluster buys, no unusual call flow, no analyst upgrades. The elevated 10Y yield (4.65%) is a structural headwind for capital-intensive airlines, and the forward 5Y inflation breakout (T5YIFR at 1.8σ above trend) adds macro pressure on airline cost structures and consumer discretionary travel spending.
IR (Ingersoll Rand) is down 18.7% from its 30-day high with no news headlines explaining the drop and sparse SEC filing metrics, making the catalyst unclear — likely macro/sector-driven rather than fundamental impairment. However, the Industrials sector is notably weak (ranked 9/11 by 30d relative strength, -5.04pts vs SPY over 30 days), suggesting this is a sector-wide headwind rather than an idiosyncratic recovery story. Options flow is extremely bullish on the surface (P/C ratio 0.11), but without z-score context it's hard to confirm unusual institutional conviction. Insider activity reflects only tax withholding on option exercises (Form F filings), not open-market purchases — providing no positive confirmation signal.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Nothing on the watchlist right now.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Micron Drops Nearly 6% as Its $50 Billion Forecast Meets AI Spending Doubts
Netflix Climbs 4%, Alphabet Ticks Up, Amazon Barely Budges as New Streaming Policy Alliance Launches
Bitcoin Climbs as AI Slowdown Calls Sink Nvidia, Intel and Other Chip Stocks
CrowdStrike Jumps Over 12.2% as Its Market Value Reaches 41 Times ARR
Wall Street hit by tech sell-off after AI bosses push for slowdown
Wall Street hit by tech sell-off after AI bosses push for slowdown
Dell Drops Over 7% as AI Servers Pass Half of Infrastructure Revenue
Off-Quarter Software Companies' Revenue Outperformance Decelerates Slightly Sequentially, RBC Says
Off-Quarter Software Companies' Revenue Outperformance Decelerates Slightly Sequentially, RBC Says
Cisco's New Splunk AI Package Targets Computing Inside the Customer's Walls
Netflix, Amazon And YouTube Reportedly Form Coalition As Washington Scrutinizes Sports Broadcasting
Apple iPhone 18 Pro pre-orders point to mixed demand signals, brokers say
APH is Overvalued at 27.17X P/E: Should You Still Buy the Stock?
Oracle Stock Falls After Ellison Scraps Plan To Sell Up To $7.5 Billion In Stock
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
- Sep 14, 12:53 PMpolicy · severity 3/5
Trump calls AI the greatest economic development engine in history.
- Sep 14, 11:56 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
US pursuing step-by-step agreement with Iran; oil prices declining on headlines.
- Sep 14, 10:18 AMcompany · severity 3/5
Major AI labs call for slower development pace citing risks and economic pressures.
- Sep 14, 8:39 AMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Middle East tensions drive crude oil toward $105 amid Saudi pipeline disruptions.
- Sep 14, 8:14 AMmarket · severity 3/5
AI semiconductor and infrastructure stocks face heavy selling pressure ahead of Monday market open.
- Sep 14, 7:59 AMmarket · severity 3/5
AI stocks decline on safety concerns; analyst provides guidance on positioning.
- Sep 14, 7:31 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Central bank week begins with USD strength and equity market pressure.
- Sep 14, 6:55 AMpolicy · severity 4/5
Fed rate hike bets surge in September amid AI stock weakness and oil surge.
- Sep 14, 6:38 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
EU imposes 24-72 hour vulnerability reporting requirements on crypto wallet providers.
- Sep 14, 6:15 AMmarket · severity 3/5
Crypto outperforms as calls for slower AI development pressure technology sector stocks.
- Sep 14, 5:53 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
India's August CPI rises to 4.82%, signaling potential central bank rate hike.
- Sep 14, 5:12 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Bitcoin faces selloff risk ahead of FOMC decision and CLARITY Act vote.
- Sep 14, 5:00 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Bitcoin volatility expected ahead of Senate CLARITY Act vote and Fed rate decision.
- Sep 14, 4:55 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Saudi crown prince and US CENTCOM chief discuss Houthi escalation response.
- Sep 14, 4:29 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Fed, BOE, and BOJ interest-rate decisions set to influence cryptocurrency markets this week.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
- Sep 14, 1:20 PM156 trigger(s) [154 cached, 2 Claude], 0 bought, 156 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 140 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 14, 12:20 PM152 trigger(s) [152 cached, 0 Claude], 0 bought, 152 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 137 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 14, 11:20 AM149 trigger(s) [148 cached, 1 Claude], 1 bought, 148 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 133 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 14, 10:21 AM160 trigger(s) [150 cached, 10 Claude], 0 bought, 160 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 144 watch-listed. Exits: 2.
- Sep 14, 9:20 AM153 trigger(s) [121 cached, 32 Claude], 2 bought, 151 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 136 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 14, 8:46 AMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Sep 14, 8:37 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 14, 6:00 AM[stage] 164 trigger(s) [164 cached, 0 Claude], 0 bought, 164 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 150 watch-listed. Exits: 0. (staged 0 open / 0 close intents to pending_orders)
- Sep 11, 3:20 PM164 trigger(s) [162 cached, 2 Claude], 0 bought, 164 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 150 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 11, 2:20 PM165 trigger(s) [165 cached, 0 Claude], 0 bought, 165 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 151 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 11, 1:21 PM163 trigger(s) [162 cached, 1 Claude], 0 bought, 163 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 149 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 11, 12:20 PM166 trigger(s) [166 cached, 0 Claude], 0 bought, 166 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 152 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 11, 11:20 AM169 trigger(s) [151 cached, 18 Claude], 0 bought, 169 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 155 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Sep 11, 10:27 AMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 3775s.
- Sep 11, 9:41 AMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Sep 10, 3:25 PM188 trigger(s) [148 cached, 40 Claude], 2 bought, 186 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 171 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Sep 10, 3:24 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 9, 3:24 PM171 trigger(s) [126 cached, 45 Claude], 2 bought, 169 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 158 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Sep 8, 3:22 PM150 trigger(s) [142 cached, 8 Claude], 0 bought, 150 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 139 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Sep 8, 2:26 PMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 3805s.