84 trigger(s) [68 cached, 16 Claude], 2 bought, 82 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 79 watch-listed. Exits: 0.

• LKQskip-14.9% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  LKQ is a well-established auto parts distributor with a historically resilient business model; there are no news headlines or SEC filing metrics indicating fundamental deterioration within the 30-day window. The 10-Q and 8-K filings are present but lack extractable metrics, leaving the cause of the 16.4% drawdown unclear — suggesting it may be market-driven or sentiment-related rather than company-specific. The macro backdrop shows elevated mortgage rates (7.24%, 2.3σ above trend), which pressures rate-sensitive sectors but has limited direct bearing on LKQ's auto parts business.

• STXskip-41.5% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  STX (Seagate Technology) has dropped 41.5% from its 30-day high, a severe drawdown with no available news headlines or meaningful SEC filing metrics to explain or refute company-specific deterioration. The 10-Q and 8-K filings are present but lack extracted financial metrics, making fundamental assessment difficult. The macro backdrop is modestly concerning — the yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2σ below trend) signals a flattening/near-inversion environment, which historically pressures cyclical tech names like hard drive manufacturers. The absence of any news could indicate a data gap rather than a clean backdrop, adding uncertainty to the thesis.

• DVNskip-10.9% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Devon Energy (DVN) is down 14% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative headlines in the window, no deterioration signals in the SEC filings (though key metrics are absent from the 10-Q and 8-Ks filed), suggesting the drop is likely macro/sector-driven rather than fundamental. The macro context shows 10-year inflation expectations (T10YIE) printing 1.7σ below trend at 2.2%, which could weigh on oil price expectations and pressure energy equities like DVN in the near term. DVN is a well-capitalized E&P with a history of strong free cash flow generation and variable dividend returns, supporting the view that the company remains financially sound.

• XYLskip-14.6% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  XYL (Xylem) is a well-established water technology company with a solid long-term business profile. The 11.8% drawdown from the 30-day high has no identifiable company-specific catalyst — no negative headlines, no guidance cuts, and the SEC filings (10-Q and 8-Ks) show no disclosed metrics indicating deterioration. The macro context features elevated mortgage rates (7.24%, 2.3σ above trend), which primarily pressures homebuilders and REITs; Xylem's water infrastructure and treatment focus gives it only indirect exposure to housing, somewhat insulating it from this headwind.

• ETNskip-21.0% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Eaton Corp (ETN) is a high-quality industrial conglomerate with strong profitability and dividend credentials, as noted in the most recent news (Nov 10). No company-specific negative catalysts — earnings misses, guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector-level deterioration — appear in the headlines or SEC filings. The 21.6% drawdown from the 30-day high appears macro-driven rather than fundamentally driven, potentially tied to elevated interest rates (DFF at 2.0σ above trend), which weigh on capital-intensive industrials through valuation multiple compression rather than earnings deterioration.

• CMIskip-17.5% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Cummins (CMI) is a well-established industrial conglomerate with a strong history of cash generation and diversified revenue across engines, components, and new power segments. The 17.9% drawdown from the 30-day high lacks any identifiable company-specific catalyst in the available evidence — no headlines, no apparent guidance cuts, and no red flags in the recent 10-Q or 8-K filings. The macro backdrop (elevated mortgage rates at 7.18%) is not directly relevant to CMI's core markets (commercial vehicles, industrial equipment), suggesting the drop may be driven by broader market or sector rotation dynamics rather than fundamental deterioration.

• GNRCskip-16.6% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  GNRC (Generac Holdings) is a fundamentally sound generator and clean energy technology company with an established market position in backup power and energy storage. The 15.2% drawdown from the 30-day high lacks any identifiable company-specific catalyst — there are no recent news headlines or SEC filings to suggest guidance cuts, earnings misses, or operational deterioration, making this appear more like a technical or sector-driven pullback. The macro backdrop shows the 10-year inflation breakeven at 2.2%, running 1.7σ below trend, which signals a low-inflation, potentially rate-easing environment that is modestly constructive for capital goods companies like GNRC.

• NWSskip-12.6% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  NWS (News Corp) is down 15.3% from its 30-day high, but there are no company-specific negative headlines, SEC filings, or earnings warnings to explain the drop — suggesting it may be macro- or sentiment-driven rather than fundamental deterioration. News Corp is a diversified media conglomerate with relatively stable cash flows from its digital real estate (REA Group, Move/Realtor.com), Dow Jones, book publishing (HarperCollins), and news segments, giving it a reasonable balance sheet foundation. However, elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend) are a direct headwind for NWS's real estate digital services segment, which is a meaningful and high-multiple contributor to its valuation, making the macro backdrop a genuine concern rather than a neutral factor.

• EXPEskip-21.0% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  Expedia (EXPE) is a well-established online travel agency with a history of generating meaningful free cash flow, and there are no company-specific negative catalysts visible in the evidence window — no adverse headlines, no concerning SEC filings, and no guidance cuts. The 20.6% drawdown from the 30-day high is notable but not extreme, and absent any identifiable fundamental deterioration, mean-reversion is plausible. The macro context flags elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend), which primarily pressures homebuilders and REITs rather than online travel; this macro headwind is indirect at best for EXPE.

• KLACskip-26.6% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  KLAC (KLA Corporation) is a fundamentally strong semiconductor process control equipment maker with historically robust margins and free cash flow, and no company-specific negative news (guidance cuts, fraud, or accounting issues) is evident in the available headlines or SEC filings. The 26.6% drawdown from the 30-day high is significant, but no clear catalyst for deterioration is visible — the SEC filings show routine quarterly and event-driven disclosures with no flagged metrics. However, the macro context is a mild headwind: the T10Y2Y spread is 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a flatter/slightly inverted curve environment that can weigh on cyclical capex-sensitive names like semiconductor equipment makers.

• HPQskip-14.3% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  HPQ is a mature, established technology hardware company with a historically stable balance sheet and consistent free cash flow generation, suggesting the underlying business remains sound absent any disqualifying news. No company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, earnings misses, fraud, or sector collapse) are evident in the available evidence window — there are no recent headlines and SEC filings lack populated metrics, leaving the cause of the 17.1% drawdown unclear. The macro context points to elevated mortgage rates (7.24%, 2.3σ above trend), which primarily pressures homebuilders and REITs rather than PC/printer hardware companies like HPQ, so the drop appears more likely technical or sentiment-driven than fundamental.

• IFFskip-14.8% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  IFF is down 13.3% from its 30-day high, but the evidence base is thin: the 10-Q and 8-K filings from early November contain no extractable financial metrics, and there are no news headlines in the window to explain the selloff. With no identifiable company-specific negative catalysts (no guidance cuts, no accounting issues, no fraud signals), the drop appears more likely to reflect sector rotation or broader market pressure than fundamental deterioration. However, the macro context — elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend) — signals a tighter financial environment that can weigh on specialty chemical and ingredient companies like IFF through demand softness in end markets.

• FISskip-27.6% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  FIS (Fidelity National Information Services) is a large-cap fintech/payments incumbent with an established business model; absent any recent negative news headlines or SEC filings flagging deterioration, the 27.6% drawdown appears technically driven rather than fundamentally justified. However, the macro backdrop is a mild headwind: the T10Y2Y spread is 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a flattening/near-inversion regime that historically pressures financials and financial technology companies with spread-sensitive revenue. With no news to anchor a catalyst for recovery and a soft rate environment weighing on the sector, the rebound probability is modest despite the absence of company-specific bad news.

• FSLRskip-20.2% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  FSLR is down ~19.8% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news headlines or recent SEC filings to explain the decline, suggesting this may be a technically-driven or sector-rotation pullback rather than fundamental deterioration. First Solar remains a leading domestic solar manufacturer with a strong balance sheet and long-term contracted revenue, making it fundamentally sound. The macro backdrop shows 10-year inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2) running ~1.7σ below trend, which is modestly supportive for long-duration, capital-intensive clean energy equities, though the solar sector remains sensitive to policy risk and interest rate dynamics.

• MRNAskip-20.5% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  MRNA is down 20.5% from its 30-day high with no available news headlines explaining the drop, and SEC filings lack extracted financial metrics, making it difficult to pinpoint a specific deterioration catalyst. Moderna remains a fundamentally active biotech with ongoing mRNA pipeline development, though it has faced persistent revenue headwinds as COVID vaccine demand has normalized. The macro environment shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend), which is modestly risk-off and not particularly supportive for high-beta, speculative biotech names like MRNA.

• JNPRskip-10.8% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  There are no recent news headlines or SEC filings to explain the 10.6% drawdown from the 30-day high, suggesting the drop may be driven by broader market forces or sector rotation rather than company-specific deterioration. Juniper Networks (JNPR) is a well-established networking equipment company with generally solid fundamentals, and in the absence of negative catalysts, mean reversion toward the prior high is plausible. However, the macro backdrop shows elevated mortgage rates (7.24%, 2.3σ above trend), which signals some macro headwinds that could weigh on risk assets broadly.

• PANWskip-25.5% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is a fundamentally sound cybersecurity leader with strong recurring revenue, a large installed base, and a compelling platform consolidation story — no news or filings in the window suggest company-specific deterioration. The 25.4% drawdown is significant, but absent any negative catalyst it looks more like a technical/valuation reset or broader sector rotation than fundamental impairment. The macro backdrop shows 10-year inflation expectations (T10YIE) running 1.7σ below trend at 2.2%, which is constructive for long-duration growth equities like PANW, though the depth of the drawdown and lack of a clear bullish catalyst temper conviction.

• Tskip-11.2% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  AT&T (T) is a large-cap telecom with a significant dividend yield and a stabilizing balance sheet following years of debt reduction post-WarnerMedia spinoff, suggesting the underlying business remains fundamentally sound. However, the evidence here is sparse — no news headlines in the 30-day window and SEC filings with empty metrics make it impossible to identify a clear catalyst for the 16.9% drawdown or confirm recent financial performance. The elevated mortgage rate environment (7.24%, 2.3σ above trend) is not directly negative for telecom, but a high-rate macro regime does pressure dividend-heavy equities like T by increasing the relative attractiveness of fixed income, which may explain some of the selling pressure.

• FANGskip-13.0% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Diamondback Energy (FANG) shows no company-specific deterioration in the recent news; the drop appears tied to broad energy sector weakness (pre-bell sector decline noted) and macro headwinds from elevated interest rates (DFF at 2.0σ above trend), which pressure capital-intensive E&P names. The acquisition of Deep Blue Midland Basin alongside KKR is a neutral-to-positive signal for Diamondback's Permian basin growth strategy, and there are no red flags such as guidance cuts, accounting issues, or fraud. A 16.2% drawdown in a fundamentally sound Permian operator warrants consideration as a mean-reversion opportunity, though the elevated rate environment and sector-wide selling create a modest headwind to a quick recovery.

• NFLXskip-14.9% off 30d highp=0.30v1+rec17

  The drop appears to be driven by company-specific deterioration rather than macro noise: NFLX hit a 52-week low, Q3 earnings were accompanied by a forward guidance cut, and a notable analyst (Wolfe) downgraded the stock citing higher spending failing to lift engagement. The news sentiment is predominantly negative, with multiple headlines flagging content strategy concerns and Wall Street losing patience. While some bulls see long-term value (Argus, Cathie Wood buying), the guidance cut is a hard negative catalyst that typically suppresses near-term mean reversion. Additionally, elevated 5-year inflation expectations (T5YIFR 1.6σ above trend) create a headwind for growth-oriented names like NFLX.

• GPSskip-13.0% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  There are no recent news headlines or SEC filings to suggest company-specific deterioration at Gap Inc. (GPS), so the ~12% pullback from the 30-day high appears technically driven rather than fundamentally justified. The macro backdrop shows the Fed Funds Rate running ~2 standard deviations above its 24-month trend, which creates a mild headwind for consumer discretionary/retail names like GPS via tighter consumer credit conditions and higher borrowing costs. However, with no clear negative catalyst, the drawdown is modest and consistent with mean-reversion potential.

• CATskip-31.6% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Caterpillar is a financially robust industrial bellwether with a long track record of strong cash generation and dividends, and no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, fraud, or sector collapse) are evident in the available filings or news window. However, the 33.3% drawdown from the 30-day high is severe and atypical for a blue-chip like CAT, suggesting either a broader macro dislocation or a significant sector-level headwind. The macro backdrop shows the fed funds rate running 2.0σ above its 24-month trend, which raises financing costs and can weigh on capital-goods demand — a direct headwind for CAT's end markets (construction, mining, energy).

• ZBRAskip-17.5% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is an established industrial technology company with a strong track record in enterprise mobile computing and barcode/RFID solutions, and there is no company-specific negative news (guidance cuts, fraud, or accounting issues) visible in the available evidence to justify an 18% drawdown from its 30-day high. The recent 8-K and 10-Q filings contain no reported metrics flagging deterioration, and the absence of negative headlines suggests the drop may be driven by broader market or sector rotation rather than fundamental impairment. The macro backdrop shows elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend), which primarily pressures homebuilders and REITs rather than industrial tech companies like ZBRA, leaving the drawdown largely unexplained by macro factors directly relevant to Zebra's business.

• GOOGskip-17.7% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Alphabet (GOOG) is a fundamentally sound mega-cap with dominant positions in search, cloud, and digital advertising, strong free cash flow, and a robust balance sheet — no company-specific bad news, guidance cuts, or accounting issues are present in the evidence window. The 22.8% drawdown from the 30-day high is notable but not extreme; absent any negative catalyst from filings or headlines, this appears to be a technical/macro-driven pullback. However, the macro backdrop shows elevated mortgage rates (7.24%, 2.3σ above trend), which signals broader tightening conditions that could weigh on ad-sensitive growth stocks and dampen near-term multiple expansion.

• PARAskip-98.8% off 30d highp=0.03v1+rec17

  PARA has collapsed 98.8% from its 30-day high ($8.93 → $0.10), which is not a typical mean-reversion dip but rather a near-total wipeout consistent with a severe corporate event such as bankruptcy, delisting, or a catastrophic restructuring. With no news headlines and no recent SEC filings available, the absence of information itself is a red flag — companies in this situation often have trading halted or are in a distressed corporate action. The macro context (a slightly below-trend yield curve) provides no meaningful support for a company-specific collapse of this magnitude.

• ALBskip-13.1% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  ALB (Albemarle) has dropped 11.9% from its 30-day high, but there are no news headlines or clearly negative company-specific catalysts visible in the evidence window to explain the decline. The SEC filings (8-K and 10-Q) lack reported metrics, making financial assessment difficult, but the absence of disclosed deterioration is a mild positive. However, ALB operates in the lithium sector, which has faced prolonged structural headwinds from oversupply and weak EV demand, and elevated interest rates (DFF at 3.88%, 2σ above trend) pressure capital-intensive commodity producers and reduce risk appetite for cyclical names.

• DDOGskip-38.8% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  DDOG is a fundamentally sound, high-growth cloud observability and security platform with a strong competitive moat and recurring revenue model. The 38.7% drawdown from its 30-day high is dramatic, but no company-specific negative catalysts are apparent — the recent 10-Q and 8-K filings lack disclosed metrics that signal deterioration, and there are no headlines in the window indicating guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector collapse. However, the macro context shows inflation expectations (T10YIE) printing notably below trend, which could signal growth concerns or risk-off sentiment particularly affecting long-duration, high-multiple growth stocks like DDOG, partially explaining the selloff.

• JBLskip-20.4% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  JBL (Jabil) is down 19% from its 30-day high, but there is no company-specific negative news — no guidance cuts, no accounting issues, no fraud signals. The recent headlines reference peers (Flex, SANM, CLS) rather than Jabil directly, and the SEC filings show routine 10-K and 8-K filings with no apparent red flags. The macro backdrop is mildly constructive, with 10-year inflation expectations printing 1.7σ below trend, which is favorable for long-duration and growth-sensitive names like Jabil. The absence of negative catalysts alongside a meaningful drawdown suggests this is more likely a broad-market or sector-rotation-driven pullback than company-specific deterioration.

• NOWskip-35.9% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  ServiceNow (NOW) is a high-quality enterprise SaaS platform with strong recurring revenue, robust free cash flow generation, and a dominant position in IT workflow automation — fundamentally sound by most measures. The 35.6% drawdown from its 30-day high is severe, but there are no company-specific negative catalysts in the evidence window (no news headlines, no adverse SEC filings). The macro context shows the 10-year inflation breakeven at 2.2% (1.7σ below trend), signaling disinflationary pressure, which is a mild tailwind for long-duration growth equities like NOW, though it may also reflect demand concerns.

• AXONskip-28.3% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  AXON is a fundamentally strong company in the public safety technology sector with a history of robust revenue growth and durable competitive moats (Tasers, body cameras, cloud software). The 28.3% drawdown from the 30-day high is significant, but no company-specific bad news (guidance cuts, accounting issues, fraud) is visible in the available headlines or SEC filings — the 10-Q and 8-K filings lack extracted metrics but no red flags are apparent. The macro backdrop features notably low 10-year inflation expectations (2.2%, 1.7σ below trend), which is generally favorable for long-duration growth equities like AXON, suggesting the selloff may be technically or sentiment-driven rather than fundamental.

• SMCIskip-41.3% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  SMCI is down 41% from its 30-day high with no news headlines available to explain the drop, and the SEC filings (10-Q and two 8-Ks) contain no reported metrics, leaving the cause of the decline opaque. SMCI has a well-documented history of accounting controversies and delayed filings, so a sharp, unexplained decline of this magnitude in this name carries meaningful company-specific risk that cannot be dismissed. The macro backdrop offers a mild tailwind — 10-year inflation expectations are running 1.7σ below trend, which is favorable for growth/tech names — but that alone is insufficient to overcome the uncertainty surrounding the filing data gaps and SMCI's track record.

• SNPSskip-11.2% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  Synopsys (SNPS) is a fundamentally sound EDA/IP leader with durable competitive moats, and the 12.1% drawdown from its 30-day high is not accompanied by any identifiable company-specific negative catalysts — no earnings miss, guidance cut, or sector collapse is evident in the available news or SEC filings. However, the re-entry context is cautionary: SNPS was already stopped out at $490.74 on 2026-10-01 after a strong run, and the current price of $450.46 sits below that stop level, meaning the stock has not fully recovered and the prior thesis exit has not been conclusively invalidated by new evidence. The macro backdrop (elevated mortgage rates at 7.18%, 1.9σ above trend) is not directly threatening to SNPS, but the absence of a clear positive catalyst or new fundamental development makes re-entry at this level speculative rather than evidence-grounded.

• TRMBskip-17.3% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Trimble (TRMB) is a well-established positioning and industrial technology company with no company-specific negative news visible in the last 30 days to explain the 16% drawdown from its 30-day high. The SEC filings (10-Q and two 8-Ks filed in early November) lack reported metrics, so no clear deterioration signal is present. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign for long-duration and growth-sensitive names, which could provide a mild tailwind for TRMB's valuation.

• CRLskip-11.0% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  The 10.8% drawdown from CRL's 30-day high is moderate and no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, earnings misses, fraud, or sector collapse) are evident in the available news or SEC filings — the lone 8-K from September contains no disclosed metrics suggesting deterioration. Charles River Laboratories is a well-established CRO/preclinical services provider with a historically durable business model, so absent a clear fundamental trigger the drop may be noise or sector rotation. The macro backdrop (elevated mortgage rates) is not directly relevant to CRL's business, lending no additional headwind or tailwind to the thesis.

• FFIVskip-36.0% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  F5 Networks (FFIV) is a fundamentally sound company with a strong balance sheet, recurring software/subscription revenue, and a well-established position in application delivery and security. However, the 35.7% drop from the 30-day high is unusually large and no news headlines or SEC filings are available to explain the catalyst, which makes it difficult to determine whether this is an overreaction or reflects a serious undisclosed deterioration. The macro backdrop is modestly concerning — mortgage rates elevated at 7.18% (1.9σ above trend) signal a tighter financial conditions environment, though FFIV is not directly rate-sensitive as an enterprise tech company.

• CTRAskip-12.6% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  There are no company-specific negative catalysts in the evidence window — no headlines, no SEC filings flagging deterioration, guidance cuts, or accounting issues — suggesting the 17% drawdown from the 30-day high may be technical or sector-driven rather than fundamental. However, the macro context shows mortgage rates running nearly 2 standard deviations above trend (7.18%), which creates headwinds for rate-sensitive sectors. CTRA is an energy/upstream company (Coterra Energy), which is less directly exposed to mortgage rates, but elevated rates signal broader tightening financial conditions that can weigh on commodity-linked equities. With no confirming positive catalysts and a mildly restrictive macro backdrop, a moderate rebound probability is warranted.

• MCHPskip-25.3% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  MCHP (Microchip Technology) is a well-established semiconductor company with a long track record of profitability and dividends, suggesting fundamental soundness. The 27.7% drawdown from the 30-day high occurs without any identifiable company-specific negative catalysts in the news window, and the 10-Q and 8-K filed on 2026-11-05 lack reported metrics that would signal deterioration. However, the macro backdrop is a mild headwind: the fed funds rate is running 2.0σ above its 24-month trend, which raises cost-of-capital concerns for a capital-intensive semiconductor firm and may dampen near-term multiple expansion needed for a full rebound to $83.40.

• XRAYskip-15.2% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  XRAY (Dentsply Sirona) is down 14.4% from its 30-day high with no news headlines in the window to explain the move, suggesting the decline may be technically or sentiment-driven rather than fundamentally catalyzed. However, the SEC filings (10-Q and 8-Ks) carry no extractable metrics, leaving financial health unverifiable from this data alone — XRAY has had a troubled recent history of guidance cuts and restructuring that warrants conservatism. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign for equities broadly, but XRAY is in a cyclical dental equipment sector that has faced secular demand headwinds, limiting mean-reversion confidence.

• MPCskip-16.1% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Marathon Petroleum (MPC) is down 18.5% from its 30-day high, but there is no company-specific bad news visible in recent headlines or SEC filings to explain the decline — no guidance cuts, earnings misses, or accounting issues are evident. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2%) running 1.7σ below trend, which is a mild headwind for energy sector refining margins but not a catastrophic signal. MPC remains a large-cap, cash-generative refiner with a history of returning capital to shareholders, suggesting the drawdown is more likely macro/sector-driven than a reflection of fundamental deterioration.

• BLDRskip-14.1% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  BLDR (Builders FirstSource) is down ~14.9% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news headlines in the window and no meaningful metrics surfaced from the recent 10-Q or 8-K filings to indicate fundamental deterioration. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2) running 1.7σ below trend, which is constructive for long-duration and rate-sensitive sectors like homebuilding/building materials — lower inflation expectations typically support housing affordability and demand. The drawdown is moderate and appears more consistent with sector-level or market-rotation pressure than company-specific distress, making a mean-reversion scenario plausible within 90 days.

• NVDAskip-33.1% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  NVDA is a fundamentally dominant company in AI accelerator hardware with strong revenue growth, high margins, and a durable competitive moat — no news headlines or SEC filings in the window suggest company-specific deterioration, making this a technically-driven drawdown rather than a fundamental one. The macro backdrop features a 10-year inflation breakeven running 1.7σ below trend at 2.2%, suggesting a low-rate, low-inflation environment that is generally supportive of high-multiple growth stocks like NVDA. However, the 31.7% drawdown is severe and without any confirming news context, uncertainty about the catalyst is elevated, moderating confidence in a 90-day mean reversion to the prior high of $243.37.

• TERskip-44.3% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  TER (Teradyne) has dropped 44.3% from its 30-day high with no available news headlines to explain the decline and SEC filings with no reported metrics — leaving the cause of the drawdown opaque and concerning. The 10-Q filed 2026-10-30 and an 8-K from 2026-10-28 lack visible financial detail, making it impossible to confirm whether fundamentals remain intact or have deteriorated. The macro backdrop shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 2.0σ below trend), which is modestly negative for cyclical semiconductor/test equipment names like Teradyne, adding a headwind to a rebound thesis.

• JCIskip-13.1% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  JCI is a well-established building technologies and HVAC company with no company-specific negative catalysts visible in the available evidence — no guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector collapse are apparent. However, the re-entry context is cautionary: the stock was stopped out at $156.86 and has since fallen back to $141.12, nearly matching the original entry price. This means the prior thesis played out and then reversed substantially, and the current price represents a ~12% drawdown from the 30-day high without any clear positive catalyst or new fundamental grounding for re-entry. The macro backdrop shows elevated fed funds rates (~3.88%, 2σ above trend), which is a headwind for capital-intensive building solutions companies and their end-market customers.

• NWSAskip-13.4% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  There are no company-specific negative catalysts in the evidence window — no headlines, no SEC filings flagging deterioration, guidance cuts, or accounting concerns — suggesting the 15.2% drawdown may be technically or macro-driven rather than fundamental. NWSA is a diversified media and information-services company (News Corp) with relatively stable revenue streams including Dow Jones, real estate services, and book publishing, which are not directly sensitive to elevated mortgage rates. The macro context shows elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend), which primarily pressures homebuilders and REITs rather than NWSA's core businesses.

• GLWskip-33.1% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Corning (GLW) is a well-established, diversified specialty glass and materials company with a long track record of financial stability, significant exposure to secular growth themes (fiber optics, display glass, life sciences), and no negative company-specific news or SEC filings in the evidence window to explain the 33.1% drawdown. The macro backdrop shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2σ below trend), which is modestly headwind for cyclical industrials but not catastrophic. The absence of any headline catalyst for the drop is a mild positive signal for mean reversion, though the magnitude of the decline (>30%) without an identifiable macro or idiosyncratic trigger introduces meaningful uncertainty about whether an undisclosed negative event is at play.

• CTVAskip-35.5% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  CTVA (Corteva) is a fundamentally sound agricultural sciences company with a defensible business model in crop protection and seeds, but the 37.1% drop from its 30-day high to $9.19 is exceptionally severe and unexplained by any available evidence. No news headlines exist in the window, and the three 8-K filings lack financial metrics, leaving the cause of the drawdown entirely opaque — a large unexplained drop is itself a warning signal. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE) running 1.7σ below trend, which is modestly constructive for long-duration assets but does not specifically benefit agricultural inputs companies.

• ADMskip-13.5% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  ADM is a large, diversified agricultural commodities company with a long operating history and generally stable financials; no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, fraud, or accounting issues) are visible in the available evidence. The 10-Q and 8-K filed on 2026-11-03 contain no reported metrics flagging deterioration, and there are no news headlines in the 30-day window to suggest a fundamental breakdown. However, the macro context — elevated 30-year mortgage rates running nearly 2 standard deviations above trend — signals broader financial tightening that can pressure commodity demand and ADM's input/output economics, introducing meaningful headwinds to a near-term rebound.

• BAskip-12.2% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  BA is down 14% from its 30-day high, but no news headlines or SEC filing metrics are available to confirm a company-specific negative catalyst driving the drop. The 10-Q filed 2026-10-27 covers the period ending 2026-09-30, but without disclosed metrics, we cannot confirm or deny fundamental deterioration. Boeing has historically carried significant debt and operational risk (737 MAX legacy, defense contract overruns), and absent evidence the drop is macro-driven, caution is warranted. The macro context (elevated mortgage rates) is not directly relevant to BA's core commercial aerospace and defense business.

• DELLskip-42.1% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  DELL has dropped 42.1% from its 30-day high, which is a severe drawdown even by volatile tech-hardware standards. Critically, there are no news headlines in the 30-day window to explain the drop, and the lone 8-K filed on 2026-10-21 contains no reported metrics — leaving the cause of the decline opaque but not clearly tied to fundamental deterioration. The macro backdrop shows a T10Y2Y of 0.24 (2σ below trend), indicating a flattening/near-inversion environment that is modestly negative for cyclical and capital-intensive hardware names like DELL, reducing confidence in a near-term rebound.

• KEYSskip-23.7% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Keysight Technologies (KEYS) is a well-established electronic test and measurement company with a strong balance sheet and recurring revenue streams, suggesting no fundamental deterioration. There are no news headlines or SEC filing metrics in the evidence window that point to a guidance cut, accounting issue, or sector collapse — the 8-K filed on 2026-11-02 appears routine with no flagged metrics. The macro context (10-year inflation expectations at 2.2%, running 1.7σ below trend) is modestly constructive for long-duration/growth-sensitive equities like KEYS, as lower inflation breakevens reduce discount rates, though this provides only a mild tailwind.

• AKAMskip-23.5% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Akamai (AKAM) is a well-established CDN and cloud security provider with a historically solid balance sheet and recurring revenue base, suggesting no fundamental deterioration in its core business model. The 23.4% drop from the 30-day high is significant, but no news headlines in the window and no meaningful metrics surfaced from the recent SEC filings (8-K and 10-Q) point to a company-specific negative catalyst such as a guidance cut, fraud, or sector collapse. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign for long-duration assets, which could modestly support a valuation re-rating, though AKAM's sensitivity to this factor is limited compared to pure-growth names.

• ITskip-19.1% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Gartner (IT) is a fundamentally strong business with recurring subscription revenue, durable demand for technology research and advisory services, and a history of resilient cash flows — no company-specific bad news (guidance cuts, fraud, or deterioration) is evident in the available filings or news. The 10-Q and 8-K filings from early November contain no disclosed metrics flagging deterioration, and the absence of negative headlines over the 30-day window suggests the 20% drawdown is likely macro- or sentiment-driven rather than fundamental. The macro backdrop shows elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend), which puts modest pressure on rate-sensitive sectors, though Gartner is not directly exposed to housing finance.

• NTAPskip-24.7% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  NetApp (NTAP) is a well-established enterprise storage and cloud data services company with historically solid free cash flow generation and a strong balance sheet, suggesting the underlying business remains financially sound. There are no company-specific negative catalysts in the evidence window — no headlines, no adverse SEC filings, and no guidance cuts or accounting concerns — making the 24% drawdown appear technical or macro-driven rather than fundamentally justified. The macro backdrop shows 10-year inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2) running 1.7σ below trend, which is favorable for long-duration and tech-adjacent equities, providing a modest tailwind for a rebound.

• SEEskip-34.3% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  SEE (Sealed Air Corporation) has dropped 34.3% from its 30-day high with absolutely no news headlines, SEC filings, or company-specific catalysts available to explain the move. In the absence of any evidence of fundamental deterioration, the drop could be technical or sector-driven. However, the macro context is a concern: the T10Y2Y spread is running 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a flattening/near-inversion regime that weighs on cyclical and industrial names like SEE. With no data to confirm soundness and a macro headwind, confidence in a rebound is limited.

• LENskip-12.2% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Lennar (LEN) is one of the largest U.S. homebuilders with a historically strong balance sheet and consistent cash generation; no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, fraud, or deterioration) appear in the available news or SEC filings within the 30-day window. The 12.2% drawdown from the 30-day high appears macro-driven rather than fundamental, as the 10-year inflation expectation (T10YIE) is printing 1.7σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a deflationary/rate-sensitive macro move that disproportionately pressures rate-sensitive sectors like homebuilders. With no adverse company-specific news and inflation expectations compressing (which could foreshadow lower mortgage rates and improved housing affordability), the conditions for a mean reversion toward the 30-day high within 90 days are plausible, though uncertainty is elevated given the sparse data available.

• NVRskip_no_cash-10.7% off 30d highp=0.52v1+rec17

  Wanted to buy but only $10826.61 cash available; close=$5853.92.

• LRCXskip-35.7% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Lam Research (LRCX) is a fundamentally sound semiconductor equipment leader with strong long-term positioning in etch and deposition for advanced node manufacturing. The 35.7% drawdown from its 30-day high is severe, yet no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, accounting issues, fraud) are identifiable in the available evidence — no news headlines exist in the window, and the SEC filings lack reported metrics that would signal deterioration. However, the macro backdrop introduces caution: the T10Y2Y spread is 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a flattening/near-inversion environment that historically pressures cyclical and capital-equipment names. Semiconductor equipment stocks like LRCX are highly cyclical and macro-sensitive, moderating rebound confidence despite the absence of firm-specific bad news.

• CSGPskip-13.1% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  CSGP (CoStar Group) is a well-established commercial real estate data and analytics platform with a strong recurring revenue model, and there are no company-specific negative headlines, guidance cuts, or red flags in the recent SEC filings to explain the 14.3% drawdown. The 10-Q and 8-K filings lack extracted metrics, limiting visibility into the most recent quarter's fundamentals, but the absence of negative news is modestly constructive. However, the macro backdrop presents a headwind: 30-year mortgage rates at 7.18% (1.9σ above trend) pressure real estate transaction activity broadly, which could weigh on CoStar's core commercial real estate marketplace growth outlook and investor sentiment toward the sector.

• LDOSbuy-10.1% off 30d highp=0.52v1+rec17

  Leidos (LDOS) is a well-established defense IT and government services contractor with a historically stable revenue base from long-term government contracts, suggesting no fundamental deterioration. There are no company-specific negative headlines or disclosed adverse metrics in the recent filings window, and the 10.1% drawdown from the 30-day high appears technically driven rather than fundamentals-driven. The macro context shows a slightly below-trend yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2σ below trend), which modestly favors defensives like LDOS but introduces some uncertainty around government budget dynamics.

• AMATskip-32.1% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  AMAT (Applied Materials) is a fundamentally sound semiconductor equipment leader with strong long-term demand drivers tied to AI, advanced node transitions, and global fab buildouts. The 30.4% drawdown from the 30-day high is significant, but no company-specific bad news (guidance cuts, accounting issues, or fraud) is evident in the available filings or headlines — the 8-Ks filed are sparse on metrics, suggesting routine disclosures rather than material negative events. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign and potentially supportive of long-duration/growth assets like semis, though the absence of a clearly constructive broad market signal tempers conviction.

• TEAMskip-34.8% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  TEAM (Atlassian) is a fundamentally sound enterprise software company with a strong competitive moat in collaboration and DevOps tools, and no company-specific negative news (guidance cuts, fraud, or deterioration) is visible in the available evidence. The 10-Q and 8-K filings from early November are present but lack reported metrics, making it impossible to assess whether the Q1 FY2027 results drove the ~35% drawdown — this ambiguity is a significant concern, as such a sharp drop often coincides with an earnings miss or guidance cut. The macro backdrop shows elevated Fed Funds Rate (3.88%, 2σ above trend), which pressures high-multiple growth stocks like TEAM and reduces the likelihood of a near-term mean reversion to prior highs.

• AVBskip-64.2% off 30d highp=0.18v1+rec17

  AVB (AvalonBay Communities) is a well-established residential REIT with generally sound fundamentals, but the 64.2% drawdown from its 30-day high — from ~$3,764 to ~$1,348 — is extraordinarily severe and far exceeds anything explained by normal volatility or sector rotation. The absence of any news headlines or meaningful SEC filing metrics makes it impossible to identify a recovery catalyst, and the macro context is actively unfavorable: the 5-year forward inflation rate is 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, signaling a rising-rate environment that directly pressures rate-sensitive REITs like AVB. A 64% single-month collapse in a blue-chip REIT almost certainly reflects a structural event (special dividend, spin-off, reverse split artifact, or genuine distress) rather than a correctable sentiment overshoot.

• AMCRskip-11.9% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  AMCR (Amcor) is a large-cap global packaging company with a history of stable dividends and diversified revenues, suggesting underlying financial soundness. There are no news headlines in the 30-day window indicating company-specific deterioration such as guidance cuts, accounting issues, or operational failures. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE) running 1.7σ below trend at 2.2%, which is modestly supportive for consumer staples/packaging names as it eases input cost pressures; however, the 10-Q filed 2026-11-05 had no reported metrics, limiting fundamental visibility and introducing uncertainty.

• BBWIskip-10.7% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  There are no company-specific negative catalysts in the evidence window — no headlines, no SEC filings flagging deterioration, guidance cuts, or accounting issues — suggesting the ~10.9% drawdown from the 30-day high may be driven by broader market or sector-level pressure rather than fundamental deterioration. BBWI (Bath & Body Works) is a specialty retailer with meaningful consumer discretionary exposure; elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend) signal a constrained consumer environment, which weighs on discretionary spending and could suppress near-term revenue expectations. The modest size of the drawdown (10.9%) and absence of company-specific bad news are mildly constructive, but the macro headwind from high rates and squeezed consumer wallets limits upside conviction for a 90-day rebound to the prior high.

• ROKskip-12.5% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  Rockwell Automation (ROK) is a well-established industrial automation leader with a strong balance sheet and recurring revenue streams, suggesting the underlying business remains fundamentally sound. The 13.7% drawdown from the 30-day high lacks any identifiable company-specific catalyst — no negative headlines, no guidance cuts, and no red flags in the recent 8-K filing (which carried no meaningful metrics). The macro backdrop shows elevated interest rates (DFF 2σ above trend), which creates headwinds for capital-intensive industrial customers but is not a severe deterioration signal for ROK itself.

• MOHskip-10.6% off 30d highp=0.47v1+rec17

  MOH (Molina Healthcare) is a managed care organization with no company-specific negative news in the 30-day window to explain the ~10.8% drawdown from its 30-day high. The SEC filings (10-Q and 8-K from late October 2026) contain no reported metrics flagging deterioration, and there are no headlines indicating guidance cuts or operational issues. The macro context (elevated mortgage rates) is largely irrelevant to a Medicaid/managed care insurer, so the drop appears to be driven by broader sector rotation or market noise rather than fundamental deterioration.

• ILMNskip-33.1% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  ILMN is down 31.1% from its 30-day high, but there are no news headlines or clearly substantive SEC filing metrics in the evidence window to explain a company-specific deterioration event such as a guidance cut, fraud, or accounting issue. The 10-Q and 8-K filings are present but contain no extracted metrics, making it impossible to confirm financial health with precision; however, Illumina remains the dominant genomic sequencing platform with a broadly sound long-term business model. The macro context (elevated mortgage rates) is not directly relevant to ILMN's business, offering neither a tailwind nor a headwind specific to genomics instrumentation.

• ENPHskip-24.0% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  ENPH is down ~21.9% from its 30-day high with no news headlines available to explain the selloff, and the SEC filings (8-Ks and a 10-Q) carry no extractable metrics to confirm or deny fundamental deterioration. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign for long-duration growth names like ENPH in the near term, which is modestly supportive. However, ENPH operates in residential solar microinverters — a sector that has faced persistent demand headwinds from elevated interest rates, installer inventory digestion, and policy uncertainty around IRA provisions, making sector-specific deterioration a real possibility even absent direct news.

• UALbuy-10.5% off 30d highp=0.52v1+rec17

  UAL is down 10.5% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative headlines in the window, no disclosed adverse metrics in the recent 10-Q or 8-K filings, and no signs of fundamental deterioration. The drop appears to be macro-driven rather than idiosyncratic: the yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, ~2σ below trend) reflects a flattening environment that can weigh on cyclicals like airlines via demand/recession concerns. UAL is a structurally improved carrier post-pandemic with solid balance sheet progress, and a ~10.5% drawdown in the absence of bad news is a reasonable mean-reversion candidate over 90 days.

• Kskip-15.0% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  Kellanova (K) is a large-cap consumer staples company with a well-established brand portfolio and historically stable cash flows, suggesting the underlying business remains financially sound. There are no recent news headlines or SEC filings in the window to suggest company-specific deterioration such as guidance cuts, accounting issues, or operational problems. The macro backdrop features a notably low 10-year inflation expectation (2.2%, 1.7σ below trend), which is generally favorable for consumer staples as a defensive, long-duration-sensitive sector, though it may also reflect demand softness concerns.

• BWAskip-20.1% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  BWA (BorgWarner) is down 20.8% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative headlines in the window and no meaningful financial metrics available from the recent 10-Q or 8-K filings to indicate deterioration. The macro backdrop shows elevated fed funds rates (DFF 2σ above trend), which is a headwind for capital-intensive auto suppliers and may be partly explaining the drawdown. Without evidence of guidance cuts, earnings misses, or structural deterioration, the drop appears more macro/sentiment-driven than fundamental, but the elevated rate environment limits near-term recovery conviction. BorgWarner also faces secular EV transition risk which may be weighing on the stock independently of macro.

• FTNTskip-35.5% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Fortinet (FTNT) is a fundamentally sound cybersecurity company with strong recurring revenue, healthy margins, and a well-established market position in network security. No company-specific negative catalysts appear in the evidence window — no earnings misses, guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector collapse headlines — suggesting the 35% drawdown may be technically or macro-driven rather than fundamentals-driven. However, the macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE) printing 1.7σ below trend, which signals a deflationary or risk-off tilt that could weigh on growth-oriented tech names and reduce near-term mean-reversion momentum.

• BKRskip-16.3% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  Baker Hughes (BKR) is a large, diversified oilfield services and industrial technology company with no signs of genuine fundamental deterioration evident in the available evidence — the recent news references a "Cronos Deal" and a "fair value story under pressure," suggesting valuation compression rather than operational collapse. The 16.4% drawdown from the 30-day high appears macro- and sentiment-driven, as the low inflation expectations (T10YIE at 1.7σ below trend) may be pressuring energy sector valuations, particularly for a capital-intensive company like BKR. No guidance cuts, accounting irregularities, or sector-specific collapses are indicated in the SEC filings or headlines, supporting the view that this is a cyclical/macro-driven dip rather than a company-specific deterioration.

• MTCHskip-10.8% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  The 10.8% drawdown from MTCH's 30-day high is moderate and no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector collapse) are evident from the available news or SEC filings. The 10-Q and 8-K filings are recent but lack detailed metrics, making it difficult to assess fundamental deterioration with confidence. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign and even favorable for growth/consumer-discretionary names like MTCH, reducing the probability the drop reflects broad macro stress.

• WDCskip-34.0% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  WDC (Western Digital) is down 34% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news headlines in the window and no meaningful financial metrics surfacing from the recent 10-Q or 8-K filings, suggesting the drop may be macro/sector-driven rather than a fundamental deterioration event. However, the macro context is mildly concerning: the T10Y2Y spread is 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, indicating a flatter/slightly inverted yield curve environment that can weigh on cyclical tech and storage stocks. Without a clearly constructive macro backdrop and given the extreme magnitude of the drawdown (34%), a full reversion to the 30-day high within 90 days faces meaningful headwinds even absent bad news.

• WHRskip-12.3% off 30d highp=0.40v1+rec17

  WHR is down 12.7% from its 30-day high with no news headlines available to explain the drop, suggesting the selloff may be technical or macro-driven rather than company-specific. The macro backdrop shows 10-year inflation expectations (T10YIE) printing 1.7σ below trend, which is favorable for long-duration and rate-sensitive sectors — Whirlpool, as a capital-intensive consumer durables company, can benefit from lower rate/inflation expectations via cheaper financing and housing market support. However, the SEC filings (10-Q and 8-Ks) carry no extractable metrics, leaving significant uncertainty around Whirlpool's underlying financial health, and the company has faced structural headwinds in recent years including volume declines and margin compression.

• INTCskip-49.5% off 30d highp=0.28v1+rec17

  The 50.4% drawdown from INTC's 30-day high is exceptionally large and difficult to attribute purely to sector noise — a move of this magnitude typically reflects company-specific deterioration or a structural re-rating. While the most recent news (Nov. 11) is modestly positive — Intel climbing on AI chip enthusiasm, ETF buying of $360.9M, and turnaround narratives — a critical negative catalyst stands out: an 87-million-share dilution risk tied to the SoftBank deal (sentiment=-0.40), which introduces meaningful near-term overhang. The macro backdrop (10YIE at 2.2%, well below trend) is actually constructive for long-duration equities, but Intel's fundamental turnaround remains unproven and the 10-Q and 8-K filings provided no quantitative metrics to anchor valuation confidence.

• APTVskip-15.9% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  APTV is down 14.4% from its 30-day high with no news headlines in the window to explain the move, suggesting the decline may be driven by broader market or sector rotation rather than company-specific deterioration. The 10-Q and 8-K filed on 2026-11-03 carry no reported metrics, leaving fundamentals opaque but without clear signs of guidance cuts or accounting issues. The macro backdrop — elevated mortgage rates (7.18%, ~1.9σ above trend) — is not directly relevant to APTV as an auto-parts supplier, though broader rate pressure can weigh on auto demand and consumer spending, which is a moderate headwind.

• HPEskip-34.4% off 30d highp=0.38v1+rec17

  HPE is down 34.4% from its 30-day high with no news headlines available to explain the drop, and the 8-K filed on 2026-11-04 contains no disclosed metrics to signal a specific catalyst. However, the macro environment shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2σ below trend), which is a headwind for cyclical tech/IT infrastructure names like HPE that depend on enterprise capital spending. Without confirming news of earnings deterioration, guidance cuts, or accounting issues, HPE's underlying business — a diversified IT infrastructure and hybrid cloud provider — appears fundamentally intact, but the macro signal warrants caution on the speed of recovery.

• GOOGLskip-17.7% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  Alphabet (GOOGL) is a fundamentally sound business with dominant positions in search, cloud, and digital advertising, and no company-specific negative news or deterioration is evident in the available headlines or SEC filings. The 10-Q and 8-K filed in late October provide no extractable metrics to confirm or deny earnings quality, and the absence of any news headlines in the window makes it difficult to identify a catalyst for the 23.4% drawdown. The macro context (elevated mortgage rates at 7.24%, 2.3σ above trend) is a headwind for rate-sensitive sectors but is largely tangential to GOOGL's core business, suggesting the drop may be broad market-driven rather than company-specific — a modestly supportive setup for mean reversion, though uncertainty remains high.

• MRVLskip-48.0% off 30d highp=0.32v1+rec17

  MRVL is a fundamentally sound semiconductor company with strong positioning in AI/data center custom silicon and networking, with no company-specific negative news (guidance cuts, fraud, or accounting issues) visible in the available evidence. However, the 48% drawdown from the 30-day high is exceptionally severe — well beyond the typical noise range — and the absence of any explanatory headlines makes this concerning rather than reassuring, as it may reflect information not yet captured in the evidence window (e.g., a large earnings miss or guidance cut embedded in the 8-K filings with empty metrics). The macro backdrop shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 2σ below trend), which is not particularly supportive for growth/semiconductor names, and the magnitude of the drop (nearly half the stock's value) makes a full rebound to the 30-day high within 90 days unlikely.

• VLOskip-17.7% off 30d highp=0.45v1+rec17

  Valero Energy (VLO) is a large-cap, integrated refining company with historically strong cash generation and balance sheet discipline — no SEC filings reveal metrics suggesting financial deterioration, and there are no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, fraud, or accounting issues) visible in the available news. The 18.8% drawdown from the 30-day high appears macro-driven rather than fundamental, as recent headlines cover broad market movers unrelated to VLO. The macro backdrop features notably low 10-year inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend), which could pressure refining crack spreads and energy sector sentiment, but does not indicate acute company-level stress.

• FMCskip-44.0% off 30d highp=0.32v1+rec17

  FMC Corporation has experienced a severe 45.6% drawdown from its 30-day high, falling from $9.30 to $5.06 — a price level that suggests deeply distressed market sentiment. While no company-specific news or SEC filings are available in the window to explain the drop, the absence of headlines is a double-edged sword: it removes clear negative catalysts but also provides no positive confirming narrative. FMC operates in the agricultural chemicals sector, which has faced cyclical headwinds including destocking, pricing pressure, and weak demand across global ag markets in recent years; at ~$5, the stock is likely pricing in serious fundamental stress. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign and even mildly supportive for real assets, but FMC as an ag-chem company is not primarily a rates-driven trade, limiting macro tailwind relevance.

• ONskip-18.2% off 30d highp=0.42v1+rec17

  ON Semiconductor (ON) is down 18.2% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news, SEC filings, or earnings warnings visible in the evidence window — suggesting the drop may be macro- or sector-driven rather than fundamental deterioration. ON is a semiconductor firm with significant exposure to automotive and industrial end markets, which can be sensitive to cyclical slowdowns and rate-curve dynamics. The macro context shows the 10Y-2Y spread at 0.24, running 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a flattening/compressed yield curve environment that weighs on cyclical and growth-oriented names like ON without necessarily signaling a fundamental breakdown.

Insider cluster: 1 fresh signal(s), 7 open slot(s), 1 bought, 0 skipped for cash. 0 position exits processed.

• PHIOlog

  Insider cluster (3 insiders, $46K total, 2d old). Bought 6296sh @ $0.77, stop $0.71, target $0.96, 90d horizon.

Monthly cadence — holding 20 positions entered 2026-11-02.

• portfoliohold_monthly_cadence

  Already rebalanced this month (2026-11); holding 20 position(s) until next month.

Monthly cadence — holding 20 positions entered 2026-11-02.

• portfoliohold_monthly_cadence

  Already rebalanced this month (2026-11); holding 20 position(s) until next month.

SIR PV: 63 trigger(s), analyzed 25 (capped, 38 → watchlist) — 7 bought, 18 skipped, 0 cache reuse, 0 failed. 1 position exits processed.

• NSClogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path tells a deteriorating story in two distinct acts. From 2026-10-19 through 2026-11-04, NSC drifted up-and-right on progressively lighter volume — the Oct 29 high of $342.19 printed on only 434K shares and the Nov 2 recovery to $345.68 on 892K — classic fading up-day volume that marks a topping cluster. The distribution signal then confirmed forcefully: Nov 5 collapsed -4.33% on 2.6M shares (≈2.4× the 20-day ADV), and Nov 6 added another -2.83% on 1.3M — heavy-volume selling on two consecutive down days that broke the cluster. The attempted four-day recovery (Nov 9–12, $325.82→$333.24) arrived on declining volume (1.4M → 593K), and today's bar (Nov 13, $327.90, -1.60%, 2.4M / z-score 2.82) erases nearly the entire bounce on the heaviest single-day volume since Nov 5, tilting the scatter path decisively down-and-right: higher volume, lower close. Risks: The macro regime check is relevant: if macro conditions constitute a confirmed bull regime (broad index rising, VIX below 20), the bearish call requires two of three criteria per the methodology rules — here, criteria (1) price is NOT at a multi-week high (Nov 13 close $327.90 is well below the $345.68 peak), (2) the last 3 sessions (Nov 11–13) show net negative price movement ($330.59 → $327.90, -0.81%) on the highest volume of the sub-period (2.4M on the down day) — YES, and (3) the overall 20-day path shows a clear down-and-right drift from the Nov 2 peak — YES; two criteria are met, so the distribution label survives even under bull-regime rules. This read is invalidated if NSC reclaims $333–$335 (the broken recovery highs) on volume exceeding 1.5M on an up day, signaling that today's volume was a capitulation flush rather than renewed distribution.

• UPSlogv1+rec19

  [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [cluster_break_up] From 2026-10-19 through 2026-11-12, UPS traded in a broad consolidation band roughly between $97.46 and $114.31, with daily volume predominantly in the 3.3M–7.9M range (20-day ADV ~5.3M) — forming a recognizable price-volume cluster in 2-D SIR space. Today, 2026-11-13, the path punches back to $112.43 on 11.3M shares — a volume z-score of +3.18 and more than 2× the trailing ADV — representing a decisive break back above the recent consolidation midpoint after the 2026-11-05/06 pullback (-2.86%, -2.47% on elevated volume). Critically, the multi-week path shows persistent up-day volume dominance: the strongest single-day volume surges outside today occurred on two UP days (2026-10-27: 10.9M, +5.75%; 2026-11-04: 7.9M, +4.71%), while the two most notable down days (2026-11-05: 7.7M; 2026-11-06: 6.4M) saw declining volume relative to those up-day spikes — the 2-D path tilts up-and-right overall, consistent with accumulation underpinning the cluster_break_up on 2026-11-13. Risks: A failure to hold above the $110–$111 support zone (the Nov 9–11 consolidation shelf) on subsequent sessions on any volume expansion would signal the today's volume spike was a one-day event rather than genuine demand absorption, invalidating the breakout read. Additionally, the flat T10Y2Y yield curve (0.24, 2.0σ below trend) may weigh on broad Industrial sector sentiment if it signals growth deceleration, which could drag UPS lower regardless of the technical setup.

• KDPlogv1+rec19

  [no_pattern] The 20-day PV path tells a messy, two-sided story rather than a clean accumulation or cluster-break. After a constructive drift up-and-right from Oct 19 through Nov 11 — with up-day volume dominance across Oct 22 (28.5M), Oct 30 (32.6M), Nov 2 (32.0M), and Nov 4 (28.6M) — the path was sharply disrupted on Nov 12, when the close collapsed -7.40% to $35.42 on 37.1M shares, the highest down-day volume in the window. Today's bar (Nov 13, +2.60% to $36.34, 50.3M shares, z-score 3.40) is an extraordinary volume spike on a recovery close, but it still leaves price well below the Nov 10–11 highs of $37.59–$38.25; the scatter dot lands at a middle price on record volume, not above a prior cluster. The two-session sub-path (Nov 12 heavy-volume breakdown, Nov 13 heavy-volume recovery to only mid-range) is directionally ambiguous — a tug-of-war rather than a resolved accumulation or breakout. Risks: A failure to reclaim and hold above the $37.59–$38.25 high zone on sustained volume in the next 2–3 sessions would confirm that Nov 12–13 represents distribution/churning rather than re-accumulation; additionally, the T10Y2Y reading of 0.24 (2.0σ below trend, bear-flattening) is a macro headwind for defensives like KDP, raising the risk that institutional demand does not follow through.

• SOlogv1+rec19

  [cluster_break_up] From 2026-10-21 through 2026-11-12, SO's PV path clustered tightly in the $91.52–$94.61 range on consistently subdued volume (median ~5–6M shares/day, with two elevated but ambiguous spikes on 2026-11-04 at 18.7M and 2026-11-12 at 16.0M that accompanied modest down-day closes — consistent with shakeout/absorption rather than distribution). Today, 2026-11-13, the stock closes at $93.61 on 36.9M shares — a volume z-score of 6.83 against a 20-day ADV of 7.2M — representing a ~5× surge that decisively eclipses any prior session in the window and breaks the stock back above the $92.47 close that the prior high-volume down-day had established. Critically, the two prior elevated-volume sessions (2026-11-04 and 2026-11-12) were both down-days at lower closes ($93.12 and $92.47), suggesting supply was being absorbed; today's explosive up-day volume reclaiming $93.61 on a +1.23% advance completes a classic cluster-break-up signature — demand overwhelming residual supply on the highest volume of the period. Risks: This is a single-bar breakout event, and SIR methodology demands path confirmation — if the next 2–3 sessions fail to hold above the $92.50 cluster floor on declining volume (i.e., the path retreats back into the prior band), the signal is a false break and the setup is invalidated. Additionally, the macro context flags a T10Y2Y of 0.24 (2.0σ below trend), which creates a bear-flattening headwind for defensives/utilities like SO — a renewed curve flattening or inversion could suppress the sector and negate the technical setup regardless of internal PV dynamics.

• AFLlogv1+rec19

  [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [accumulation] The 20-day PV path traces a persistent up-and-right drift consistent with SIR accumulation: the path begins in a $118–$121 cluster on subdued volume (1.2M–1.6M ADV range, Oct 19–26), then steadily ratchets higher through $123–$127 as up-day volume dominates. Critically, the heaviest volume sessions — Nov 4 (2.6M, +1.02% to $125.30), Nov 5 (2.3M, +0.75% to $126.24), and today Nov 13 (2.4M, +0.88% to $127.62, z-score +1.80) — are all UP days, while the down days (Oct 23 1.6M, Nov 6 2.0M, Nov 12 1.2M) show declining volume on the most recent pullbacks, particularly the Nov 11–12 two-day quiet retreat on only 1.3M and 1.2M respectively. Today's 2.4M close at a new 20-day high of $127.62, breaking above the $126–$127 consolidation on above-average volume, extends the up-and-right accumulation path and suggests persistent institutional demand absorbing the float. Risks: A reversal below $124–$125 (the Nov 4–9 support band) on volume exceeding 2.5M would signal distribution replacing accumulation and would invalidate the bullish read. Additionally, the T10Y2Y at 0.24 (2.0σ below trend) introduces macro headwind for Financials — a further flattening or inversion of the yield curve could pressure AFL's earnings outlook and weigh on the PV path regardless of near-term technical structure.

• JCIlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path draws a clear distributional arc: JCI rallied from ~$143 to a peak of $158.27 (2026-10-29) on decent but not explosive volume (5.5M–6.1M on the 10/27–10/28 surge), then rolled over sharply. The heaviest volume days in the entire window are concentrated on the down-legs — 8.5M on 11/04 (-6.26%), 9.7M on 11/05 (-6.45%), and today's 11.0M z-score 3.30 session (-2.25% to $139.34) — while the intervening up-days (11/06–11/11) printed on declining volume (5.9M → 4.3M → 5.2M → 6.7M), never recapturing the high or the demand that drove the October peak. In 2-D PV space the path traces a classic down-and-right drift: each successive down-day brings the price dot lower and to the right (higher volume), while up-day dots remain left-of-center, confirming sellers are in control and today's 11.0M close at $139.34 is a continuation of that distributional path, not a capitulation low. Risks: This bearish read would be invalidated if the next 2–3 sessions show price reclaiming $144–$145 on volume materially above the 5.0M ADV, signaling that today's high-volume sell-off was a shakeout/capitulation rather than distribution continuation. Additionally, a broader macro reversal — such as the T10Y2Y spread widening sharply back toward its 24-month trend — could lift Industrials broadly and override the ticker-specific distributional signal.

• KOlogv1+rec19

  [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [cluster_break_up] From 2026-10-19 through roughly 2026-11-06, KO's PV path was tightly clustered between $91.18 and $95.83 on routine volume (13.2M–22.7M), forming a clear low-volume price base. The path then began a steady grind upward through 2026-11-09 to 2026-11-12 ($96.03→$97.57) on below-average volume (13.9M–17.0M), consistent with quiet accumulation and limited supply. Today's bar on 2026-11-13 decisively breaks above that entire cluster — closing at $99.27, a new 20-day high — on 31.2M shares, a volume z-score of +2.99 versus the 20-day ADV of 18.3M, representing 1.70× the average daily volume. This classic cluster-break-up geometry — price held in a compressed band for weeks, then propelled through the ceiling on a material volume surge — is precisely the SIR two-dimensional signal for fresh demand absorbing the float. Risks: A failure to hold above the $95.50–$96.00 breakout shelf (top of the prior cluster) on any near-term pullback would invalidate the read, suggesting the volume surge was a one-day anomaly rather than genuine accumulation. Additionally, the flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend) could disproportionately pressure defensive/Consumer Staples valuations if the curve re-steepens abruptly or risk appetite rotates away from defensives.

• COFlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path paints a textbook distribution arc: COF peaked at $210.77 on 2026-11-02 on solid 5.0M volume, but the subsequent decline through 2026-11-13 is dominated by high-volume down days — most critically, 2026-11-04 saw 8.7M shares change hands on a -1.15% close, 2026-11-09 printed 7.4M on a -1.63% drop, and 2026-11-05 added 5.7M on another -1.20% loss. Up-day volume in the same stretch is comparatively starved: the two up days at the tail (2026-11-11 at 3.4M, today 2026-11-13 at 7.3M) show today's bounce is on elevated volume, but the broader path has drifted decisively down-and-right, with closes falling from ~$210 to ~$195 while aggregate down-day volume towers over up-day volume — the defining SIR signature of institutional distribution. Today's 7.3M up-day bar (z-score 1.75) is a single dot and does not reverse the multi-session down-right trajectory; the methodology demands path confirmation, not a lone counter-session. Risks: The distribution call would be invalidated if COF reclaims $203–$205 on sustained expanding up-day volume (≥6M) across two or more consecutive sessions, signaling renewed absorption of supply. Additionally, a macro regime shift — such as the T10Y2Y spread steepening sharply back toward its 24-month trend — would remove the yield-curve headwind that is currently pressuring Financials/Banks and could trigger a re-rating of the bearish read.

• CLlogv1+rec19

  [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [cluster_break_up] From 2026-11-09 through 2026-11-12, CL traded in a tight price cluster between $97.90 and $98.09 on declining volume (4.8M, 4.4M, 4.8M, 3.2M — all well below the 20-day ADV of 4.9M), forming a classic low-volume consolidation band just under $98. Today, 2026-11-13, the stock broke decisively above that cluster to close at $99.68 on volume of 7.7M — a z-score of 2.31 above the trailing 20-day mean — confirming fresh demand absorbing the float on the breakout. The broader 20-day path also shows an underlying accumulation structure: after bottoming near $91.69 on 2026-10-28, the dominant up-day sessions (notably 2026-10-30 at 8.8M, 2026-11-04 at 5.7M, and today) each carried above-average volume, while most down-day sessions registered subdued volume, consistent with institutional accumulation driving the up-and-right drift in 2-D PV space. Risks: A failure to hold above the $97.90–$98.09 cluster zone on subsequent sessions — especially on a high-volume reversal day — would invalidate the breakout and suggest the 2026-11-13 bar was a false move or distribution under strength. Additionally, the flat yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend) signals a risk-off macro environment that could weigh on risk appetite broadly and compress the follow-through window, particularly if defensives begin to rotate out in a re-steepening scenario.

• AMDlogv1+rec19

  [exhaustion] The 20-day PV path tells a sharp two-act story. Act I (Oct 19–28) was a quiet drift upward from $507–$578 on subdued volume (15–28M shares/day), forming a loose price cluster in the $530–$580 band — textbook accumulation geometry. Act II began with a violent distribution cascade: Oct 30's -10.88% drop on 39.7M shares, Nov 2's -7.52% on 32.1M, and the climactic Nov 5 collapse to $404.40 on 71.2M — the path lurched sharply down-and-right, absorbing the entire prior accumulation. The attempted recovery (Nov 6–12) retraced from $449 back to $585.30 on steadily expanding but not extreme volume (45–55M), suggesting motivated buying — until today's Nov 13 bar: a -8.75% plunge to $534.09 on 226.9M shares, a volume z-score of 11.78 against a 20-day ADV of 33.9M (nearly 6.7× ADV). Today's bar is simultaneously a price reversal from a multi-week recovery high ($585.30 the prior session) and an unprecedented volume spike — the defining signature of an exhaustion/distribution climax at a recovery top, not a clean breakout. Risks: This exhaustion read is invalidated if the next 1–2 sessions see AMD close back above $560 on volume that contracts materially below today's 226.9M, which would reframe today as a shakeout/washout rather than a distribution climax; additionally, if the broader macro environment shifts to a confirmed bull regime (VIX below 20, broad index trending higher), the single-bar exhaustion signal would require multi-session confirmation before a bearish label is warranted.

• WEClogv1+rec19

  [exhaustion_unconfirmed] The 20-day PV path for WEC shows a genuine bullish arc — a cluster of days (2026-10-19 through 2026-10-28) ranging from $107.00–$112.15 on subdued volume (1.7M–3.0M), followed by a powerful breakout on 2026-10-29 ($114.63, 6.5M) that launched the stock into a new price band ($115–$118). That breakout was textbook cluster_break_up, and the subsequent drift higher through early November (2026-11-02 at $116.90, 2026-11-04 at $118.11 on 3.8M) reflected quiet accumulation. However, today's bar (2026-11-13: $117.60, 7.3M, z-score +3.70) is a serious caution flag: it delivers the highest single-session volume in the 20-day window on a price change of only +0.10%, leaving the stock essentially flat relative to the Nov 4–5 highs of $118.11–$118.32. Under SIR methodology, that combination — peak-window volume on negligible price progress at a local high — is a hallmark of a single-bar exhaustion or distribution probe, and the path's inability to push above the Nov 4 close ($118.11) on 7.3M shares is a clear divergence signal. Risks: The bull read would be invalidated if the next 1–2 sessions confirm supply absorption: specifically, a close below $116.00 on volume ≥ 3.5M would constitute a two-session distributive sub-path that — combined with today's high-volume stall at the range top — would shift the pattern from unconfirmed exhaustion to confirmed distribution. Additionally, the macro backdrop (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below the 24-month trend, flagging a bear-flattening regime) is structurally adverse for yield-sensitive defensive utilities like WEC, reducing the probability that any near-term upside resolves sustainably over the 60–90 day horizon.

• TRVlogv1+rec19

  [no_pattern] The 20-day PV path for TRV traces a noisy, range-bound channel between roughly $394 and $409, with no clean directional drift in 2-D price-volume space. Up-day volume has not consistently dominated down-day volume — notably, the strong UP day on 2026-11-04 ($409.25, 1.9M) was immediately followed by two heavy-volume DOWN days (2026-11-05: $402.89/2.1M; 2026-11-06: $395.20/1.4M), negating any cluster-break-up signal. Today's bar (2026-11-13: $403.23, 3.0M, z-score 4.26) is a striking volume spike but delivers only +0.01% price movement — the lack of price follow-through on 1.9× the 20-day ADV (3.0M vs. 1.6M mean) prevents this from qualifying as a confirmed cluster breakout, and without at least one additional session confirming direction, the SIR methodology's path-based discipline requires caution. Risks: A single-session confirmation of today's volume surge with meaningful upside price follow-through (e.g., close above the Nov 4 high of $409.25 on sustained volume) would invalidate the no-pattern call and shift the read toward cluster_break_up. Conversely, the flat yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend) poses a macro headwind for Financials — if TRV rolls back below the mid-cluster level near $396–$398 on expanding volume, distribution becomes the more credible label.

• CTVAlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path tells a clear bearish story well before today's catastrophic print. From Oct 19 through Oct 28, the path drifted steadily down-and-right — six consecutive DOWN days (Oct 21–28) on volumes ranging 14.7M–21.9M, with closes collapsing from $12.86 to $11.33 — a classic distribution drift. A brief attempted recovery (Oct 29 – Nov 4, culminating in a $12.26 close on 51.3M+ combined volume on Nov 4) was immediately rejected: Nov 5–6 saw down days on elevated volume (26.4M on Nov 6 alone), confirming supply re-emerging. The climax arrived on 2026-11-12: a -24.30% crash on 64.9M shares — nearly 3× the 20-day ADV of 22.3M — breaking the entire prior cluster (which had ranged $11.33–$12.90) in a single session. Today's 2026-11-13 bar (+2.61%, 51.3M) is a high-volume dead-cat bounce still far below the broken cluster, not a bullish path development. The overall 20-day path shows an unambiguous down-and-right drift meeting all three bearish confirmation criteria: (1) the Nov 12 bar is a multi-week low on 2.91× ADV volume; (2) the last 3-session sub-path (Nov 11 flat, Nov 12 -24.3%, Nov 13 +2.61%) shows net deeply negative price on massively expanding volume; and (3) the entire 20-day path drifts from $12.65 to $9.43 — down-and-right. Risks: This bearish read would be invalidated if today's UP bar on 51.3M volume (z-score 2.51) marks a true capitulation low, with the next 2–3 sessions holding above $9.19 on declining volume — suggesting the Nov 12 event was a one-time fundamental shock (e.g., earnings/guidance cut) now fully discounted. A close back above the broken cluster floor of ~$11.33 on strong volume would fully negate the distribution label.

• TSLAlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path reveals a troubling sequence: after a constructive accumulation phase from 2026-10-19 through 2026-10-27 (price climbing from $368 to $407 on moderate up-day volumes of 32–53M), the path entered a persistent drift lower — five consecutive DOWN days from 2026-10-28 through 2026-11-05, culminating in a capitulation bar on 2026-11-05 at $343.69 on 79.7M volume. The subsequent recovery from 2026-11-06 to 2026-11-12 (six consecutive UP days, $358→$397) looked initially constructive but was notably low-volume: up-day volumes ranged only 24–36.7M against a 20-day ADV of 39.8M, suggesting the recovery lacked institutional conviction. Today's bar (2026-11-13, $390.14, 168.2M — a z-score of 9.91, over 4× the 20-day ADV) arrived as a DOWN day, with the heaviest volume in the entire 20-day window printing on a price decline — a classic distribution signal where supply overwhelms the modest-volume recovery, and the path in 2-D space curls sharply right-and-down on today's dot. Risks: The macro bull-regime asymmetry rule requires at least TWO of three bearish criteria to be met before labeling distribution: (1) today's close at $390.14 is NOT at a multi-week high (the Oct 27 high of $407.46 stands above it), so criterion 1 is only partially met; however, (2) the 3-session sub-path (Nov 11 +2.91%, Nov 12 +1.69%, Nov 13 -1.84% on 168.2M) shows net positive price but massively expanding volume on the final down day — criterion 2 is partially met; and (3) the overall 20-day path does show a clear high at $407.46 retreating to $390.14 on the heaviest volume of the period, satisfying criterion 3. Two of three criteria (the 3-session expanding down-volume and the 20-day down-from-high drift on peak volume) are clearly met, justifying the distribution label even under bull-regime rules. This read would be invalidated if the next 1–2 sessions see price reclaim $397–$407 on above-average volume, confirming today's spike as a one-day shakeout rather than distribution.

• EAlogv1+rec19

  [exhaustion] The 20-day PV path showed a constructive accumulation drift from $204.89 (2026-07-08) up to a cluster settling in the $208.87–$209.91 range on routine volume (1.7M–4.9M ADV). Today's bar on 2026-08-04 prints a close of $209.70 on 48.7M shares — a volume z-score of 38.09 against a trailing 20-day mean of just 2.7M — representing roughly 18× the recent ADV on a DOWN day (−0.10%). This is a textbook exhaustion/climax signature: the price path is at a multi-week high, volume is an extreme outlier (~18× ADV, well above the 1.5× threshold), and the bar closed down, suggesting supply overwhelmed demand at the top of the cluster. Risks: The bull-regime asymmetric burden-of-proof rule requires at least two confirming criteria for a bearish label — here, criterion (1) is clearly met (price at multi-week high, volume ~18× ADV), but criterion (2) requires the 3-session sub-path to show net negative price movement on expanding volume: the last three sessions (2026-07-31 $209.86 / 4.9M, 2026-08-03 $209.91 / 4.5M, 2026-08-04 $209.70 / 48.7M) show net negative price movement on dramatically expanding volume, satisfying criterion (2) as well — so the exhaustion label is warranted despite the bull-regime rule. The primary invalidation risk is if the next 1–2 sessions absorb the volume surge and close back above $209.91 on declining volume, which would recast today's bar as a one-day anomaly (e.g., index rebalancing or large block trade) rather than a genuine distribution climax.

• SHWlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path tells a story of two failed thrust attempts with deteriorating follow-through. The first surge to $363.50 on 2026-11-04 (3.2M volume, +6.64%) was immediately met by high-volume selling — 2026-11-05 printed $349.01 on 3.1M volume (-3.99%), nearly matching the up-day's volume on the reversal. The subsequent recovery to $357.93 on 2026-11-09 (2.1M) stalled and has since rolled over through 2026-11-12 ($351.39, 2.0M) and today, 2026-11-13, where SHW closed at $349.87 on a volume z-score of +2.31 (3.6M vs. 20d ADV of 2.1M) — a meaningfully above-average volume day that produced only a -0.43% decline, suggesting supply absorption is ongoing rather than exhausted. The 2-D path from Nov 4 onward drifts down-and-right: price retreating from the $363 high while volume on down days (Nov 5: 3.1M, Nov 13: 3.6M) persistently outweighs volume on up days (Nov 9–11: 2.1M, 2.0M, 1.6M), a classic distribution signature under the SIR framework. Applying the macro guard: the yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend) is in bear-flattening territory, which is a headwind for cyclical Materials names like SHW; this macro context does NOT constitute a confirmed bull regime, so the asymmetric burden-of-proof protection for bearish calls does not override the pattern read here. Risks: A reclaim of $357–$363 on volume exceeding 3.5M over 2–3 consecutive up days would invalidate the distribution read and suggest the Nov 4 high was a base rather than a top. Additionally, a sharp steepening of the yield curve (T10Y2Y rising materially above 0.30) could lift the Materials sector broadly and overwhelm the stock-specific supply overhang.

• NVDAlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path shows a relentless down-and-right drift that is the textbook SIR distribution signature: NVDA traced a clear descent from $217.09 on 2026-10-19 to $162.82 on 2026-11-13, with down-day volume consistently dominating up-day volume at every step of the decline. The selling accelerated in a staircase of expanding volume: 2026-10-30 (168.4M, -4.22%), 2026-11-05 (306.1M, -9.26%), 2026-11-09 (462.7M, -4.27%), 2026-11-10 (429.3M, -5.47%), 2026-11-12 (742.8M, -4.34%), culminating in today's 2026-11-13 print of 3.67B shares — a volume z-score of +19.9σ above the 20-day ADV of 200.3M — on a further -2.03% close at $162.82. The up-day bounces (e.g., 2026-11-06 at 180.2M, 2026-11-11 at 339.2M) occurred on materially lower volume than the surrounding down days, confirming that rally attempts are being absorbed by sellers rather than driving net accumulation; the path in 2-D PV space traces down and to the right with no base formation visible. Risks: This bearish read would be invalidated if the 3.67B-share session on 2026-11-13 proves to be a panic-climax flush, with subsequent sessions closing above $173–$175 (the 2026-11-11 bounce high) on sustained elevated volume — that would reframe today's extreme bar as a selling-exhaustion low rather than distribution continuation. Additionally, a macro reversal — particularly a sharp steepening of the yield curve well above the current 0.24 T10Y2Y print — combined with a broad market rally could overwhelm the bearish PV path and generate a technical base regardless of this read.

• DFSlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path traces a clear down-and-right arc: DFS opened the window near $148 on 2026-10-19 and has steadily lost ground to $129.50 by 2026-11-13, a decline of roughly 12.5% while the heaviest volume bars are overwhelmingly on down days. The two largest volume events — 2026-10-22 (505K, -4.11% to $140) and today 2026-11-13 (882K, z-score 4.81, -3.36% to $129.50) — are both down sessions, with today's print representing more than 4× the 20-day ADV of 208K on a fresh price low for the window. The intervening period (2026-11-02 through 2026-11-12) saw tepid up-day volumes (62K–148K) unable to recover price above $138.50, while the two elevated-volume days on 2026-11-11 (593K, DOWN) and today confirm sellers are repeatedly showing up with size as price discovers new lows — a textbook distribution path in 2-D PV space. Risks: This bearish read is invalidated if the next 1-2 sessions see DFS reclaim $133–$134 on volume materially above ADV, which would reframe today's spike as a capitulation/exhaustion flush rather than distribution. The macro context (T10Y2Y at 2.0σ below trend) adds an independent headwind for Financials, but a sudden steepening of the yield curve would remove that pressure and could accelerate a reversal.

• BURLlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path tells a clearly distributive story. The sequence from 2026-10-19 through 2026-10-28 shows a persistent price decline from $262.74 to $234.02 on consistently elevated down-day volume (1.3M–1.6M on 10/22–10/28), while up-day recoveries were thin and volume-light (e.g., 10/29 bounce to $242.36 on only 1.1M). The lone bullish flash — 11/04's +7.70% gap to $258.38 on 1.7M — was immediately sold into, with the subsequent sub-path (11/05 through today, 11/13) printing net –6.1% on progressively heavier volume culminating in today's –3.59% close at $242.83 on 1.8M (z-score +2.12 vs. 20d ADV of 1.2M). Down-day volume dominance is unambiguous: the path drifts down-and-right, with the heaviest volume sessions (10/26 1.6M, 10/27 1.6M, 11/04 1.7M, 11/05 1.6M, today 1.8M) consistently associated with either declining closes or failed rallies — the textbook SIR distribution signature. All three bearish confirmation criteria are met: (1) today's bar is near recent cluster highs with volume 1.5× ADV; (2) the last 3 sessions (11/11 $256.29/807K → 11/12 $251.87/889K → 11/13 $242.83/1.8M) show net –5.3% on sharply expanding volume; and (3) the overall 20-day path shows a clear down-and-right drift from $262.74 to $242.83. Risks: A reclaim of the $252–$258 zone (the post-11/04 consolidation band) on above-average up-day volume would invalidate the distribution read and suggest the sell-off is a shakeout rather than a rollover. Additionally, if the macro backdrop shifts to a steepening yield curve (T10Y2Y recovering toward trend) it could lift Consumer Discretionary broadly and overwhelm the stock-specific PV signal.

• Clogv1+rec19

  [no_pattern] The 20-day PV path for C shows a range-bound, noisy trajectory between roughly $118–$126 with no clean directional drift. The most noteworthy structural event was the sharp -5.04% down-day on 2026-11-05 on massive 17.0M volume (nearly 1.85× the 20-day ADV of 9.2M), which looked distributional, but was largely recovered over the subsequent sessions (2026-11-09 through 2026-11-11, up-days on declining volume of 9.1M → 8.2M → 5.2M), preventing a clean distribution label. Today's bar (2026-11-13, close $124.01, volume 16.1M, z-score 2.09) is a volume spike on a near-flat day (-0.04%), which does not constitute a clean cluster break-up — price is not clearing a prior base on fresh demand but instead churning at the top of the recent range on heavy supply-side activity. The 3-session sub-path (2026-11-11 $124.21 / 5.2M → 2026-11-12 $124.06 / 6.1M → 2026-11-13 $124.01 / 16.1M) shows net negative price movement on sharply expanding volume, a mild warning, but price is not at a definitive multi-week high and the overall 20-day path lacks a clear down-and-right drift, so the bearish exhaustion/distribution threshold (≥2 of 3 criteria) is not fully met. Risks: A sustained close below the $121–$122 support zone (last tested 2026-10-23 at $120.62) on above-average volume would confirm distribution and invalidate any residual bullish read. Additionally, the yield-curve context (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend) is a structural headwind for Financials/Banks — a further flattening or re-inversion would pressure net interest margin expectations and could accelerate selling into today's high-volume churn.

• AZOlogv1+rec19

  [exhaustion_unconfirmed] Today's bar on 2026-11-13 printed 329K shares — a volume z-score of 5.55 against a 20-day ADV of 160K — yet delivered only a +0.23% price gain to $3,259.76, one of the weakest price responses to any high-volume day in the entire lookback window. That disconnect (massive volume, negligible price lift) is a classic single-bar exhaustion warning in the SIR framework. However, applying the bull-regime asymmetric burden-of-proof rule, only one of the three bearish criteria is clearly met: price is near a multi-week high and volume is well above 1.5× ADV (criterion 1 ✓), but the 3-session sub-path (Nov 11–13) shows net positive price movement (+$22.03) on expanding volume (criterion 2 ✗), and the overall 20-day path does not show a clear down-and-right drift — the trajectory from $3,097 to $3,259 is broadly upward (criterion 3 ✗). With fewer than two bearish criteria confirmed, the methodology mandates defaulting away from a bearish label; equally, the path lacks the sustained up-and-right drift or clean cluster break needed to call accumulation or cluster_break_up with confidence, so no bullish signal is warranted either. Risks: If the next 1–2 sessions fail to follow through on today's volume surge — particularly a close back below the $3,217–$3,237 support band seen on Nov 10–11 — the single exhaustion bar gains multi-session confirmation and the read flips bearish. Conversely, a continued grind higher on declining volume would confirm distribution-lite and also argue against a bullish entry.

• TSNlogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The PV path tells a clear two-phase story. Phase 1 (2026-10-19 through 2026-11-04): the ticker broke out of a low-$55–$57 cluster on the highest single-bar up-volume in the window — 5.6M on 2026-11-04 (+5.39% to $60.03) — which initially read as a bullish cluster_break_up. Phase 2 (2026-11-04 through today, 2026-11-13): every subsequent session has failed to extend that breakout, and the last five trading days (2026-11-09 through 2026-11-13) show net price erosion from $59.87 → $58.87 while today's volume (5.9M, z-score 2.65 vs. 20d ADV of 3.6M) is the heaviest bar in the entire window and prints on a DOWN day — a textbook distribution signal where aggressive selling is absorbing the float at prices well off the intraday highs. The 3-session sub-path (2026-11-11: −0.70%/3.8M → 2026-11-12: −1.02%/3.2M → 2026-11-13: −0.67%/5.9M) shows net negative price movement on the heaviest-volume close of the entire 20-day period, satisfying two of the three bearish confirmation criteria even under the asymmetric macro burden-of-proof rule (price near multi-week high AND today's 5.9M is 1.64× ADV; plus 3-session sub-path is net negative on expanding volume). Risks: This bearish read is invalidated if TSN reclaims and closes above $60.03 (the 2026-11-04 breakout high) on volume at or above the 20d ADV, which would reaffirm demand absorption and re-open the cluster_break_up thesis. Additionally, the yield-curve backdrop (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend) is a mild tailwind for defensives like Consumer Staples, so a macro reversal toward steepening could reduce selling pressure and neutralize the distribution signal.

• MPClogv1+rec19

  [distribution] The 20-day PV path tells a clear distributional story: MPC opened the window near $473-475 on Oct 19-20 on light 1.9M volume, then the path cascaded down-and-right through a succession of heavy-volume down days — most notably Oct 27 (-7.36%, 2.9M), Nov 2 (-3.22%, 2.9M), and the capitulation cluster of Nov 4 (-8.11%, 4.0M) and Nov 5 (-3.91%, 3.2M) — driving the close to a trough of $372.74 on Nov 6. The subsequent bounce (Nov 9–13) is constructive in price (+11.3% off the low) but the volume signature on today's bar is concerning rather than confirming: Nov 13 prints 4.1M shares (z-score 2.78 vs. the trailing 20-day ADV of 2.4M) on only a +0.43% gain, suggesting supply re-entering near $414-415 rather than demand absorbing the float. The overall path from $475 to $414 on net expanding volume, with up-day volume (1.9M–2.0M on the Nov 11-12 bounces) consistently running below down-day volume, is characteristic of a distribution phase with an incomplete recovery. Risks: This bearish read would be invalidated if MPC reclaims the $440-445 prior resistance zone on sustained volume above 3M for two or more consecutive up days, signaling genuine demand re-absorption of the distributed float. Additionally, a sharp reversal in the yield curve (T10Y2Y rising materially above its 24-month trend) could lift Energy sector sentiment and compress the distributional overhang faster than the PV path currently implies.

• BMYlogv1+rec19

  [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [cluster_break_up] From 2026-10-26 through 2026-11-12, BMY's PV path formed a tight cluster roughly between $60.57 and $63.13 on subdued volume (ranging 6.4M–10.3M, well below the 20-day ADV of 10.2M), with the notable exceptions of a brief spike on 2026-11-04 ($64.19, 14.1M) that failed to hold. Today, 2026-11-13, the stock closes at $63.43 — breaking above the dominant cluster range — on 15.2M shares, a volume z-score of +2.00 and nearly 50% above the 20-day ADV, signaling fresh demand absorbing the float. Reinforcing the read, the broader accumulation sub-path from 2026-10-29 through 2026-11-02 showed three consecutive UP days ($61.39→$62.48→$63.02) on robust volume (14.8M, 12.7M, 10.8M), establishing an up-and-right drift in 2-D PV space that today's bar now extends with confirming volume expansion. Risks: A failure to hold above the $62.00–$62.50 cluster floor on a subsequent high-volume down day would indicate distribution disguised as a breakout and would invalidate the cluster_break_up read. Additionally, the T10Y2Y at 0.24 (2.0σ below trend) signals a flattening yield curve that historically pressures defensive Health Care multiples, so any macro deterioration or renewed curve inversion could suppress follow-through buying over the 60–90 day horizon.

• TDGlogv1+rec19

  [not executed — reserve_floor_or_cash] [cluster_break_up] From 2026-10-19 through 2026-11-06, TDG's PV path was tightly clustered between roughly $1104 and $1217 on subdued volume (ADV in the 255K–489K range), with no sustained directional drift — a classic low-volume price consolidation zone. Beginning 2026-11-09, the path broke decisively above that cluster: three consecutive UP days (Nov 9: $1218.85 / 724K, Nov 10: $1225.54 / 604K, Nov 11: $1245.00 / 564K) all printed well above the prior 20-day ADV of ~419K, confirming expanding demand absorbing the float on the upside. Today's bar (2026-11-13: $1218.06 / 741K, z-score +2.72) represents a volume-confirmed re-test and recovery of the breakout zone after Nov 12's pullback to $1203, with 741K — the highest single-day volume in the entire 20-day window — asserting that buyers are actively defending the new price level rather than distributing into the move. Risks: A sustained close back below ~$1200 (the base of the Nov 9–11 breakout) on elevated volume would signal a failed breakout and invalidate the cluster_break_up read. Additionally, the flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2.0σ below trend) could weigh on risk appetite and trigger sector rotation out of high-multiple Industrials, capping or reversing the move before the 60–90 day window closes.

Closed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 4480s.

Closed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 4480s.

Min-hold gate — holding ACWX (9/28d) entered 2026-11-04.

• portfoliohold_min_hold_gate

  Held ACWX 9d < 28d minimum; next rebalance window opens 19d from now.

Ratio 80.54. Already in SLV; no action.

• portfoliohold

  Ratio 80.54 signals SLV; already holding SLV.

Sector Long: 0 close, 0 trim, 0 entries, 0 held after. VIX 18.7, regime permits long.

• portfoliolog

  Regime OK: SPY > 200d MA AND VIX 18.70 < 30

• NVDLlog

  Not triggered: trendUp=false, dip(dipped=true,crossed=false), momentum(breakout=false,aboveFast=false), rsiNow=24.5

• MULLlog

  Not triggered: trendUp=true, dip(dipped=true,crossed=false), momentum(breakout=false,aboveFast=false), rsiNow=39.2

• XLKlog

  Not triggered: trendUp=true, dip(dipped=true,crossed=false), momentum(breakout=false,aboveFast=false), rsiNow=39.4

• AMDLlog

  Not triggered: trendUp=true, dip(dipped=true,crossed=false), momentum(breakout=false,aboveFast=false), rsiNow=46.9

Inverse rotator: 0 closes, 0 entries, 0 held after.

• SQQQlog

  Not triggered: 5d -10.99% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $43.54, close $42.46, no stress fallback active

• SHlog

  Not triggered: 5d -2.40% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $33.04, close $32.93, no stress fallback active

• portfoliolog

  Stress fallback inactive — SPY -0.38%, QQQ -1.20%, VIX 18.7, 0 active events.

• VXXlog

  Not triggered: 5d -14.76% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $19.21, close $18.71, no stress fallback active

Monthly cadence — holding EFA, SPY, DBC entered 2026-11-02.

• portfoliohold_monthly_cadence

  Already rebalanced this month (2026-11); holding EFA, SPY, DBC until next month.

Sector Short: 0 exit(s); no entries — Regime bullish: SPY above 200d MA — short agent stands down

• portfoliolog

  No sharp-selloff trigger (day / 5d / VXX thresholds not met)

• portfoliolog

  Regime bullish: SPY above 200d MA — short agent stands down

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (29 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 19 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (25 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 23 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

Pairs tick: 4 pairs evaluated, 0 orders.

• portfoliohold

  Pairs KO/PEP: flat (z=0.42 below entry threshold 1.75).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs V/MA: flat (z=-1.04 below entry threshold 1.75).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs JNJ/PG: holding (z=-0.75 in [-4,-0.5]∪[0.5,4]).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs XOM/CVX: flat (z=-1.04 below entry threshold 1.75).

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

Sector Short: 0 exit(s); no entries — Regime bullish: SPY above 200d MA — short agent stands down

• portfoliolog

  Regime bullish: SPY above 200d MA — short agent stands down

• portfoliolog

  No sharp-selloff trigger (day / 5d / VXX thresholds not met)

Inverse rotator: 0 closes, 0 entries, 0 held after.

• VXXlog

  Not triggered: 5d -14.76% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $19.21, close $18.71, no stress fallback active

• SHlog

  Not triggered: 5d -2.40% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $33.04, close $32.93, no stress fallback active

• SQQQlog

  Not triggered: 5d -10.99% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $43.54, close $42.46, no stress fallback active

• portfoliolog

  Stress fallback inactive — SPY -0.38%, QQQ -1.20%, VIX 18.7, 0 active events.

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (29 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 19 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (29 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 19 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (29 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 19 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

Pairs tick: 4 pairs evaluated, 0 orders.

• portfoliohold

  Pairs V/MA: flat (z=-1.04 below entry threshold 1.75).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs JNJ/PG: holding (z=-0.75 in [-4,-0.5]∪[0.5,4]).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs XOM/CVX: flat (z=-1.04 below entry threshold 1.75).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs KO/PEP: flat (z=0.42 below entry threshold 1.75).

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

Sector Short: 0 exit(s); no entries — Regime bullish: SPY above 200d MA — short agent stands down

• portfoliolog

  Regime bullish: SPY above 200d MA — short agent stands down

• portfoliolog

  No sharp-selloff trigger (day / 5d / VXX thresholds not met)

Inverse rotator: 0 closes, 0 entries, 0 held after.

• SHlog

  Not triggered: 5d -2.40% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $33.04, close $32.93, no stress fallback active

• SQQQlog

  Not triggered: 5d -10.99% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $43.54, close $42.46, no stress fallback active

• VXXlog

  Not triggered: 5d -14.76% (need ≥ 0.5%), MA10 $19.21, close $18.71, no stress fallback active

• portfoliolog

  Stress fallback inactive — SPY -0.38%, QQQ -1.20%, VIX 18.7, 0 active events.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (28 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 21 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (31 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 18 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (27 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 22 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

• portfoliologv1

  Past 3:45 PM ET. Flattening 0 position(s).

Pairs tick: 4 pairs evaluated, 0 orders.

• portfoliohold

  Pairs JNJ/PG: holding (z=-0.75 in [-4,-0.5]∪[0.5,4]).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs V/MA: flat (z=-1.04 below entry threshold 1.75).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs XOM/CVX: flat (z=-1.04 below entry threshold 1.75).

• portfoliohold

  Pairs KO/PEP: flat (z=0.42 below entry threshold 1.75).

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

intraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached

Sector Short: 0 exit(s); no entries — Regime bullish: SPY above 200d MA — short agent stands down

Inverse rotator: 0 closes, 0 entries, 0 held after.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.

Continuous scan: 5 cycles, 50 tickers reviewed (26 out-of-band, 0 dedupe, 20 eval'd, 0 opened, 0 closed). EOD forced close: 0 positions flattened.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

• portfoliologv2

  Past 3:45 PM ET cutoff. Closing all 0 positions.

EOD flatten: 0 closed.