Scorecard
Head to head
Frozen prompt vs. evolving prompt
Open Positions
(74)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
Open Positions
(74)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
- 2 sh × $577.45 ($1,155 cost)$557.57$1,115−$39.76−3.44%
- 3 sh × $372.48 ($1,117 cost)$374.03$1,122+$4.66+0.42%
- 4 sh × $240.47 ($962 cost)$277.29$1,109+$147.26+15.31%
- 10 sh × $92.50 ($925 cost)$87.81$878−$46.95−5.08%
- 2 sh × $456.73 ($913 cost)$509.29$1,019+$105.12+11.51%
- 14 sh × $68.21 ($955 cost)$65.86$922−$32.90−3.45%
- 3 sh × $286.03 ($858 cost)$289.16$867+$9.39+1.09%
- 3 sh × $262.87 ($789 cost)$277.73$833+$44.57+5.65%
- 2 sh × $507.33 ($1,015 cost)$495.80$992−$23.06−2.27%
- 33 sh × $30.54 ($1,008 cost)$32.83$1,083+$75.57+7.50%
- 3 sh × $285.83 ($857 cost)$288.74$866+$8.73+1.02%
- 5 sh × $173.17 ($866 cost)$182.51$913+$46.70+5.39%
- 2 sh × $493.60 ($987 cost)$502.88$1,006+$18.56+1.88%
- 7 sh × $138.97 ($973 cost)$157.67$1,104+$130.90+13.46%
- 8 sh × $123.69 ($990 cost)$126.10$1,009+$19.28+1.95%
- 1 sh × $29.76 ($30 cost)$31.29$31+$1.53+5.14%
- 1 sh × $83.29 ($83 cost)$77.32$77−$5.97−7.17%
- 1 sh × $567.48 ($567 cost)$564.49$564−$2.99−0.53%
- 5 sh × $186.35 ($932 cost)$198.88$994+$62.65+6.72%
- 1 sh × $86.31 ($86 cost)$88.51$89+$2.20+2.55%
- 1 sh × $409.07 ($409 cost)$412.90$413+$3.83+0.94%
- 1 sh × $238.00 ($238 cost)$240.32$240+$2.32+0.97%
- 1 sh × $381.59 ($382 cost)$411.31$411+$29.72+7.79%
- 2 sh × $372.10 ($744 cost)$372.51$745+$0.82+0.11%
- 3 sh × $266.88 ($801 cost)$274.08$822+$21.60+2.70%
- 5 sh × $173.88 ($869 cost)$254.62$1,273+$403.70+46.43%
- 2 sh × $644.86 ($1,290 cost)$742.67$1,485+$195.61+15.17%
- 5 sh × $227.28 ($1,136 cost)$247.85$1,239+$102.85+9.05%
- 15 sh × $75.86 ($1,138 cost)$82.96$1,244+$106.50+9.36%
- 4 sh × $276.77 ($1,107 cost)$271.95$1,088−$19.28−1.74%
- 6 sh × $177.02 ($1,062 cost)$173.73$1,042−$19.74−1.86%
- 6 sh × $157.32 ($944 cost)$169.03$1,014+$70.26+7.44%
- 2 sh × $473.88 ($948 cost)$504.85$1,010+$61.93+6.53%
- 2 sh × $433.93 ($868 cost)$446.92$894+$25.97+2.99%
- 1 sh × $988.54 ($989 cost)$952.41$952−$36.13−3.65%
- 5 sh × $362.97 ($1,815 cost)$353.29$1,766−$48.42−2.67%
- 4 sh × $359.16 ($1,437 cost)$350.94$1,404−$32.90−2.29%
- 4 sh × $468.91 ($1,876 cost)$512.25$2,049+$173.34+9.24%
- 34 sh × $30.47 ($1,036 cost)$28.18$958−$78.03−7.53%
- 2 sh × $401.14 ($802 cost)$405.75$812+$9.22+1.15%
- 6 sh × $464.98 ($2,790 cost)$460.99$2,766−$23.94−0.86%
- 22 sh × $46.88 ($1,031 cost)$50.51$1,111+$79.75+7.73%
- 7 sh × $147.58 ($1,033 cost)$157.67$1,104+$70.59+6.83%
- 4 sh × $250.46 ($1,002 cost)$278.20$1,113+$110.96+11.08%
- 5 sh × $179.87 ($899 cost)$193.21$966+$66.70+7.42%
- 3 sh × $344.25 ($1,033 cost)$334.26$1,003−$29.97−2.90%
- 4 sh × $245.83 ($983 cost)$267.36$1,069+$86.12+8.76%
- 11 sh × $88.75 ($976 cost)$98.03$1,078+$102.13+10.46%
- 5 sh × $184.96 ($925 cost)$189.57$948+$23.07+2.50%
- 34 sh × $30.86 ($1,049 cost)$32.29$1,098+$48.62+4.63%
- 15 sh × $70.06 ($1,051 cost)$74.57$1,119+$67.65+6.44%
- 1 sh × $687.07 ($687 cost)$714.10$714+$27.03+3.93%
- 1 sh × $946.04 ($946 cost)$944.96$945−$1.08−0.11%
- 9 sh × $114.60 ($1,031 cost)$114.81$1,033+$1.93+0.19%
- 3 sh × $338.42 ($1,015 cost)$324.68$974−$41.22−4.06%
- 16 sh × $109.92 ($1,759 cost)$117.34$1,877+$118.64+6.75%
- 3 sh × $300.56 ($902 cost)$314.55$944+$41.97+4.65%
- 6 sh × $192.84 ($1,157 cost)$180.45$1,083−$74.34−6.43%
- 5 sh × $202.85 ($1,014 cost)$226.08$1,130+$116.15+11.45%
- 5 sh × $220.67 ($1,103 cost)$248.27$1,241+$138.00+12.51%
- 7 sh × $168.37 ($1,179 cost)$183.28$1,283+$104.37+8.86%
- 66 sh × $18.15 ($1,198 cost)$21.93$1,447+$249.48+20.83%
- 16 sh × $89.90 ($1,438 cost)$90.41$1,447+$8.16+0.57%
- 24 sh × $90.11 ($2,163 cost)$90.52$2,172+$9.84+0.45%
- 8 sh × $145.23 ($1,162 cost)$165.20$1,322+$159.76+13.75%
- 5 sh × $207.59 ($1,038 cost)$224.25$1,121+$83.27+8.02%
- 9 sh × $131.17 ($1,181 cost)$147.43$1,327+$146.34+12.40%
- 1 sh × $775.97 ($776 cost)$749.72$750−$26.25−3.38%
- 27 sh × $43.57 ($1,176 cost)$47.20$1,274+$98.01+8.33%
- 6 sh × $182.04 ($1,092 cost)$202.30$1,214+$121.56+11.13%
- 5 sh × $226.89 ($1,134 cost)$233.21$1,166+$31.60+2.79%
- 3 sh × $306.76 ($920 cost)$330.91$993+$72.45+7.87%
- 2 sh × $432.68 ($865 cost)$452.56$905+$39.75+4.59%
- 2 sh × $403.92 ($808 cost)$409.07$818+$10.29+1.27%
Closed Positions
(49)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
Closed Positions
(49)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
How this agent thinks
Plain English. Skip the jargon, read this first.
Sits in cash 100% of the time and waits. The trigger is specific: an S&P 500 stock must drop 10% or more from its highest price in the last 30 days. When that happens, the agent pulls together a packet of evidence — recent news headlines, the latest SEC filings, the company's revenue and earnings, plus a summary of what the broader economy is doing — and hands it to Claude AI with one question: 'Is this company actually broken, or is the market overreacting to noise?' If Claude says the company is sound and there's a real chance of rebound, the agent buys. The agent sells the moment the stock recovers to its prior 30-day high (the original target), OR drops 8% below where it bought (the stop), OR has been held for 90 days — whichever happens first. The question it asks Claude is locked at day 0 and never changes — that way at day 365 we know exactly what the original analytic frame was worth. This agent is the CONTROL for the v3 rollout — it does NOT get pyramiding or re-entry, by design. It's the baseline that Agents V and VIII are measured against.
Universe: S&P 500 starter set (30 large-cap names, expandable) · Capital: $100,000
Prompt performance
Closed-position stats broken out by the prompt version that authored each buy.
| Prompt | Trades | W / L / S | Win rate | Avg P/L % | Total P/L | Avg hold | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unknown | 2 | 0 / 2 / 0 | 0% | -9% | -$236 | 1d | Jun 8, 2026 → Jun 9, 2026 |
| v1 | 47 | 12 / 35 / 0 | 25.5% | -2.46% | -$1,753 | 14.2d | May 15, 2026 → Jun 29, 2026 |
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
INTU is a fundamentally strong, recurring-revenue business (TurboTax, QuickBooks, Credit Karma) with durable competitive moats and strong free cash flow generation. However, a 39.2% decline from a 30-day high is an extremely severe drawdown for a large-cap quality compounder, and the evidence base here is very thin — no news headlines to explain the drop, and an 8-K with no disclosed metrics, leaving the cause of the decline opaque and potentially serious. With no macro catalyst (the FRED data points to low inflation expectations, a neutral-to-mildly-positive backdrop for growth equities) to explain a drop of this magnitude, the most likely explanation is company-specific negative news that has not yet surfaced clearly in available data, making a 90-day recovery to the prior high improbable.
The 37.1% drop from the 30-day high is severe and accompanied by genuine negative catalysts — a headline-level headcount reduction of 21,000 employees, analyst cost debates, and what is described as Oracle's worst month since 2001 — suggesting this is not pure macro noise. However, Oracle's underlying financials remain solid: EPS of $3.15, net income of ~$9B, and operating cash flow of ~$14.7B as of the February quarter, indicating the business itself is generating strong cash. The selloff appears driven by a combination of AI-driven restructuring concerns, sector rotation away from legacy tech, and broader NASDAQ weakness, but the magnitude and negative news flow make a full rebound to $250 within 90 days highly unlikely.
SMCI has a well-documented history of accounting irregularities and auditor issues, and the three blank 8-K filings (with no metrics) in June 2026 are a yellow flag suggesting potential material events being disclosed without transparency. The 36.9% drop from the 30-day high is severe and, absent any macro catalyst of that magnitude (inflation expectations are actually falling, per the T10YIE reading), suggests company-specific deterioration rather than sector rotation. Without news headlines to contextualize the drop, the most prudent interpretation is that the filing activity reflects undisclosed negative developments.
ENPH is down 35.1% from its 30-day high with no news headlines to explain the move, suggesting macro or sector rotation pressure rather than company-specific deterioration. The two recent 8-K filings lack financial metrics, providing no clarity on fundamentals. The macro context shows 10-year inflation expectations at 2.0σ below trend (2.21%), which is favorable for long-duration growth stocks like ENPH in theory, but the solar/clean-energy sector has faced persistent demand headwinds, policy uncertainty, and multiple compression — a 35% drop in 30 days is severe and likely reflects more than macro noise alone.
Accenture (ACN) is a fundamentally strong, diversified IT services and consulting firm with historically stable revenues and strong free cash flow generation, suggesting the underlying business remains sound. However, a 34.8% drop from its 30-day high is an unusually severe move for a large-cap blue chip, and the complete absence of news headlines or meaningful SEC filing metrics makes it impossible to diagnose the cause — whether it's macro-driven, a guidance cut, or sector-specific pressure. The macro context shows inflation expectations running 2σ below trend, which could compress long-duration valuation multiples for a premium-valued stock like ACN, but the magnitude of the decline far exceeds what macro rotation alone typically produces, raising concern about an undisclosed fundamental catalyst.
ServiceNow (NOW) is a high-quality enterprise SaaS platform with historically strong fundamentals, recurring revenue, and durable competitive moats in IT workflow automation. However, the evidence base here is extremely thin — no recent news headlines, no SEC filings, and only a macro signal showing a compressed yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.38, 2.3σ below trend). A 31.4% drawdown from the 30-day high is a severe move for a large-cap SaaS name, which raises concern that company-specific negative catalysts (e.g., guidance cut, macro spending slowdown in enterprise IT) may have driven the drop but are simply absent from the provided data. Given the lack of contradicting negative evidence, the company is tentatively assessed as sound, but the magnitude of the drop and the data vacuum introduce significant uncertainty.
Atlassian (TEAM) is a well-established enterprise SaaS company with a strong market position in collaboration and DevOps tooling, and there are no headlines or SEC filings in the evidence window to suggest fundamental deterioration — no guidance cuts, no accounting issues, and no sector collapse. The 33% drop from the 30-day high is severe and, in the absence of company-specific negative news, may reflect macro or sector rotation pressures. However, the macro context (5-year inflation breakevens 1.5σ below trend) suggests a deflationary/risk-off tilt that would weigh on high-multiple growth software stocks like TEAM, and a 33% drawdown without any supportive catalysts visible makes a full rebound to prior highs within 90 days uncertain.
EPAM is a fundamentally sound IT services and software engineering company with a historically strong balance sheet and recurring enterprise client relationships. However, the 29.6% drop from its 30-day high is severe, and the evidence base is very thin — no recent news headlines, a sparse 8-K with no financial metrics, and no 10-Q/10-K to assess current fundamentals. The macro backdrop (10-year inflation expectations 2σ below trend) is mildly supportive for long-duration tech/growth equities, but insufficient to explain or dismiss a move of this magnitude on its own. Without a clear catalyst for the drop or confirmation that it is purely macro-driven, the uncertainty is high.
ALB (Albemarle) is a lithium producer that has been under persistent pressure from depressed lithium prices, and the 29.3% drop from its 30-day high is consistent with ongoing sector headwinds rather than a sudden company-specific deterioration. The available news headlines are unrelated to ALB, and the 8-K filing lacks disclosed metrics, providing no new fundamental clarity. The macro context shows inflation expectations running significantly below trend (T10YIE 2.0σ below 24-month average), which could support rate-sensitive sectors but does little to directly catalyze a lithium price recovery that would drive ALB higher.
ADBE is a fundamentally strong business with dominant positions in creative software and digital experience, recurring subscription revenue, and historically strong free cash flow generation — there is no evidence in the available filings or headlines of accounting irregularities, guidance cuts, or structural deterioration. However, the 28.7% drop from the 30-day high is severe, the 10-Q filed June 15 contains no extractable metrics to confirm recent financial health, and the complete absence of news headlines makes it impossible to determine whether the sell-off is macro-driven or company-specific. The flat-to-slightly-positive yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.38, below trend) suggests a risk-off macro backdrop that disproportionately pressures high-multiple growth stocks like ADBE, but without confirming catalysts for recovery, a full mean-reversion to the 30-day high within 90 days carries meaningful uncertainty.
CTSH is down 27.4% from its 30-day high, a significant drop, but the available evidence provides very little clarity on the cause — there are no earnings-related headlines, no guidance cuts, and no accounting red flags visible. The sparse news (a neutral Accenture comparison piece and an S&P 500 movers recap) and a content-free 8-K suggest the drop may be tied to sector-wide IT services/consulting pressure rather than company-specific deterioration. However, the magnitude of the decline (nearly 28%) in the absence of a clear macro catalyst specific to CTSH raises concern that negative information may not yet be fully reflected in the available data.
FOXA has dropped 28.6% from its 30-day high with no clearly identifiable fundamental catalyst in the available evidence — no SEC filings, no earnings warnings, no accounting issues, and no company-specific negative news in recent headlines. The macro context shows 5-year inflation expectations running 1.5σ below trend, which is broadly disinflationary and not specifically harmful to a media company like Fox. However, a 28.6% drawdown in 30 days is a severe move that typically reflects either significant sector-level selling pressure, a specific corporate event not captured here, or a broader re-rating of media assets, making a full rebound to $69.17 within 90 days unlikely without a clear catalyst.
Akamai (AKAM) is a well-established CDN and cloud security provider with historically stable recurring revenues, solid free cash flow generation, and a defensible market position — fundamentally sound in the absence of any negative news or filing disclosures. However, a 27% drawdown from a 30-day high is substantial, and with no news headlines or recent SEC filings to explain the drop, it is difficult to distinguish between macro-driven rotation and company-specific deterioration. The macro context (5Y breakeven inflation 1.5σ below trend) suggests a mild deflationary/risk-off tilt, which could pressure growth-oriented tech names like AKAM, but is not a sufficiently strong catalyst to explain a move of this magnitude on its own.
PVH is a well-established apparel conglomerate (Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger) with a long operating history, and there are no visible headlines in the 30-day window indicating fundamental deterioration such as guidance cuts, accounting issues, or fraud. However, the evidence base is very thin — SEC filings carry no reported metrics, and the absence of news makes it difficult to diagnose the cause of the sharp 27.8% decline. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations running well below trend (T10YIE at 2.0σ below its 24-month average), which could be a mild tailwind for consumer discretionary via lower borrowing costs, but apparel names like PVH face real headwinds from tariff/trade policy uncertainty and slowing consumer spending.
CRM has been a dominant enterprise SaaS platform with strong recurring revenue, but the 26.6% drop from its 30-day high is steep and the available evidence is thin — no news headlines, and the 10-Q and 8-K filings contain no extractable metrics to confirm or refute financial health. The macro backdrop shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.38, 2.3σ below trend), which is not directly negative for high-quality growth software but signals risk-off rotation that can pressure valuation multiples on premium-priced tech names like CRM. Without confirming evidence of fundamental deterioration, the drop appears more consistent with macro/sector rotation pressure than genuine business deterioration, but the magnitude of the move and lack of clarity keep conviction low.
Gartner (IT) is a well-established, high-quality research and advisory business with durable recurring revenues and a strong competitive moat. However, the 27.7% drop from the 30-day high is steep and the evidence base is thin — no news headlines in the window and the 8-K filing contains no financial metrics, leaving the cause of the selloff unclear. The macro context shows 10-year inflation expectations 2σ below trend, which could pressure valuation multiples for high-P/E names like Gartner, but does not suggest fundamental deterioration.
DOW Inc. is a large-cap commodity chemicals company with a history of cyclical volatility; the 26.9% drop from its 30-day high is severe but not clearly tied to company-specific deterioration in the available evidence — no earnings warnings, accounting issues, or guidance cuts appear in the news or filings. The macro context shows a notably low 10-year inflation breakeven (2.21%, 2σ below trend), which signals deflationary pressure that is fundamentally bearish for commodity chemical pricing and DOW's margins. Without recent SEC filings and with only neutral/generic news, there is insufficient evidence to confirm a catalyst for recovery within 90 days.
The 27.5% drop in FOX is steep, but the available news headlines reference Netflix and Lionsgate — not FOX Corp directly — suggesting the decline may be partially tied to sector-wide sentiment pressure on media stocks rather than FOX-specific deterioration. FOX remains a relatively asset-light, live-news and sports-focused broadcaster with a defensible business model, and no SEC filings signal earnings cuts or accounting issues. However, the lack of company-specific filings or positive catalysts, combined with a compressed inflation expectations macro environment (T5YIE 1.5σ below trend, which is not directly favorable for media), limits confidence in a near-term rebound to the $61.96 prior high.
WDAY is a well-established enterprise cloud HCM/ERP platform with a historically resilient recurring revenue model, making it fundamentally sound in the absence of any visible deterioration signals. However, the evidence base is extremely thin — no news headlines, no financial metrics in SEC filings, and no company-specific catalysts are available to explain the 25.6% drop from the 30-day high or support a recovery thesis. The macro context shows 10-year inflation expectations printing 2.0σ below trend, which could signal a risk-off rotation out of long-duration growth software names like WDAY, potentially explaining part of the selloff.
CME Group is a fundamentally sound business — a near-monopoly exchange operator with durable fee-based revenue, strong free cash flow, and low capital intensity. The 24.8% drop from the 30-day high is steep for a defensive, cash-generative business, and no news headlines or meaningful SEC filing metrics are present to explain fundamental deterioration. The macro context shows the 10-year inflation breakeven printing 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, which could compress trading volumes and volatility expectations — CME's core revenue driver — making this a macro-driven headwind rather than a company-specific collapse. However, a 24.8% drawdown in 90 days is unusually large for CME, and without news to confirm the cause, the path back to $308 within 90 days faces real uncertainty.
PTC is an industrial software/IoT company (PLM, AR, IoT) with recurring SaaS revenues and a generally solid balance sheet — no evidence in the available news or filings of fundamental deterioration such as guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector collapse. The 26.2% drop from the 30-day high is steep, but the news headlines are entirely generic market-scanner content with no PTC-specific negative catalysts identified. However, the macro context shows a yield curve (T10Y2Y) running 2.1σ below trend, a bear-flattening signal that historically pressures growth/tech names with elevated multiples, which PTC carries. With no SEC filings available to confirm recent earnings quality, the lack of company-specific evidence cuts both ways.
HPE is down 29.2% from its 30-day high, a substantial move, but the evidence window contains no news headlines to explain the drop, leaving macro/sector rotation as the most plausible culprit. The yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.4, 2.1σ below trend) is flattening toward inversion, which historically pressures cyclical tech/hardware names like HPE through valuation compression and capital-spending caution among enterprise customers. The 10-Q and 8-K filings are very recent but contain no extractable metrics, so no clear fundamental deterioration is confirmed — HPE's balance sheet and server/AI infrastructure business remain structurally intact as far as available evidence shows.
QCOM remains a fundamentally sound semiconductor company with strong positions in mobile, automotive, and IoT chipsets, and no news headlines in the window suggest company-specific deterioration driving the 24.1% drop. The macro environment shows 10-year inflation expectations printing 2.0σ below trend, suggesting a deflationary/risk-off rotation that could pressure cyclical tech broadly. However, the 8-K filed today with an empty metrics payload is notable — it may reflect a routine filing or a material event whose content is unknown, introducing meaningful uncertainty.
BSX's 23.2% drop from its 30-day high appears driven by a below-consensus Q1 outlook, which represents a meaningful negative catalyst rather than pure macro noise. Boston Scientific remains a fundamentally sound medtech company with diversified revenue streams, but a guidance miss of this magnitude typically signals near-term earnings pressure that can keep a stock suppressed for multiple quarters. The macro backdrop (a flattening yield curve 2.3σ below trend) is more relevant to banks and defensives, not medtech, so the drop is predominantly company-specific.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Nothing on the watchlist right now.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Palantir and Nvidia Bring Open AI Models Inside U.S. Government Systems
This Little-Known Company Sinks After Securing $11 Million in Nvidia Blackwell AI Servers
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Wall Street Just Supersized Its Price Target on Intel. Is the Stock Still Too Cheap?
Alphabet shares jump after joining Dow Jones Industrial Average
Alphabet shares jump after joining Dow Jones Industrial Average
Alphabet shares jump after joining Dow Jones Industrial Average
Citi Just Slapped a Massive $2,500 Price Target on SanDisk. Here’s Why They’re So Bullish
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
- Jun 29, 1:53 PMpolicy · severity 3/5
FDA selects Eli Lilly and Regeneron for PreCheck Pilot Program to accelerate manufacturing facility reviews.
- Jun 29, 1:31 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Super Micro Computer Taiwan offices raided in chip smuggling investigation; stock trading lower.
Tickers:SMCI - Jun 29, 12:33 PMpolicy · severity 3/5
US Strategic Petroleum Reserve hits lowest level since 1983, affecting crude oil prices.
- Jun 29, 10:27 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Kalshi traders predict upcoming jobs report will miss Wall Street consensus expectations.
- Jun 29, 7:40 AMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
U.S. envoys Kushner and Witkoff to meet Iran in Doha negotiations.
- Jun 29, 6:24 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
US-Iran de-escalation channels established ahead of diplomatic talks.
- Jun 29, 5:01 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
EU's MiCA deadline threatens unlicensed crypto firms with regulatory wipeout.
- Jun 29, 3:06 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Middle East oil and LNG producers maintain operations despite maritime security threats.
- Jun 29, 1:19 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
South Korea commits $518 billion to AI chips, outpacing crypto sector investment.
- Jun 29, 1:03 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Bitcoin declines to $59,700 as Iran tensions ease, benefiting equities over crypto.
- Jun 29, 12:31 AMpolicy · severity 4/5
BIS warns AI investment surge poses systemic financial risk via leveraged debt structures.
- Jun 29, 12:02 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Iranian cyberattacks on Israel escalated in 2026, raising regional security concerns.
- Jun 28, 9:56 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
US-Iran strikes lift oil prices while Fed rate hike expectations weigh on gold.
- Jun 28, 9:48 PMpolicy · severity 4/5
BOJ aligns monetary policy with Japanese government's economic growth targets.
- Jun 28, 9:22 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
China blacklists 20 Japanese entities in dual-use export restrictions; normal trade unaffected.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
- Jun 29, 9:58 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 29, 8:13 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 26, 9:27 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 25, 11:46 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 24, 5:05 PM109 trigger(s) [59 cached, 50 Claude], 9 bought, 100 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 93 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Jun 24, 12:59 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 23, 12:52 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 23, 12:36 PMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Jun 23, 9:52 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 22, 6:20 PM113 trigger(s) [70 cached, 43 Claude], 6 bought, 107 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 101 watch-listed. Exits: 4.
- Jun 22, 5:06 PMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 4108s.
- Jun 22, 9:39 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 3 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 22, 8:59 AMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Jun 22, 8:55 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 18, 5:20 PM101 trigger(s) [63 cached, 38 Claude], 2 bought, 99 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 92 watch-listed. Exits: 2.
- Jun 18, 5:04 PMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 4216s.
- Jun 18, 11:52 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Jun 18, 9:24 AMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Jun 18, 8:57 AMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Jun 18, 8:48 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target