Scorecard
Head to head
Frozen prompt vs. evolving prompt
Open Positions
(83)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
Open Positions
(83)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
- 13 sh × $84.37 ($1,097 cost)$85.28$1,109+$11.83+1.08%
- 3 sh × $315.61 ($947 cost)$323.07$969+$22.37+2.36%
- 6 sh × $167.74 ($1,006 cost)$173.89$1,043+$36.90+3.67%
- 4 sh × $256.78 ($1,027 cost)$254.94$1,020−$7.36−0.72%
- 5 sh × $206.74 ($1,034 cost)$237.96$1,190+$156.10+15.10%
- 4 sh × $240.32 ($961 cost)$251.67$1,007+$45.40+4.72%
- 7 sh × $150.28 ($1,052 cost)$143.97$1,008−$44.21−4.20%
- 15 sh × $68.52 ($1,028 cost)$69.14$1,037+$9.30+0.90%
- 10 sh × $101.95 ($1,020 cost)$103.00$1,030+$10.50+1.03%
- 2 sh × $377.35 ($755 cost)$379.39$759+$4.08+0.54%
- 4 sh × $361.99 ($1,448 cost)$346.25$1,385−$62.98−4.35%
- 12 sh × $87.70 ($1,052 cost)$87.32$1,048−$4.56−0.43%
- 4 sh × $221.20 ($885 cost)$233.10$932+$47.60+5.38%
- 5 sh × $192.88 ($964 cost)$189.07$945−$19.05−1.98%
- 3 sh × $359.39 ($1,078 cost)$356.14$1,068−$9.75−0.90%
- 3 sh × $321.05 ($963 cost)$311.91$936−$27.42−2.85%
- 10 sh × $105.52 ($1,055 cost)$99.84$998−$56.80−5.38%
- 10 sh × $185.59 ($1,856 cost)$191.94$1,919+$63.50+3.42%
- 4 sh × $242.06 ($968 cost)$234.44$938−$30.48−3.15%
- 5 sh × $200.79 ($1,004 cost)$194.09$970−$33.50−3.34%
- 32 sh × $41.22 ($1,319 cost)$40.00$1,280−$39.20−2.97%
- 8 sh × $223.55 ($1,788 cost)$222.93$1,783−$4.96−0.28%
- 1 sh × $962.59 ($963 cost)$927.91$928−$34.68−3.60%
- 4 sh × $262.63 ($1,051 cost)$250.90$1,004−$46.92−4.47%
- 6 sh × $154.30 ($926 cost)$145.29$872−$54.06−5.84%
- 2 sh × $849.28 ($1,699 cost)$817.61$1,635−$63.34−3.73%
- 2 sh × $454.71 ($909 cost)$428.41$857−$52.61−5.79%
- 2 sh × $357.03 ($714 cost)$336.31$673−$41.44−5.80%
- 2 sh × $515.67 ($1,031 cost)$493.92$988−$43.50−4.22%
- 1 sh × $1,057.66 ($1,058 cost)$996.85$997−$60.81−5.75%
- 6 sh × $221.24 ($1,327 cost)$218.25$1,310−$17.94−1.35%
- 10 sh × $104.20 ($1,042 cost)$109.38$1,094+$51.80+4.97%
- 12 sh × $104.34 ($1,252 cost)$109.49$1,314+$61.80+4.94%
- 4 sh × $261.77 ($1,047 cost)$265.36$1,061+$14.36+1.37%
- 3 sh × $321.87 ($966 cost)$319.52$959−$7.05−0.73%
- 4 sh × $262.96 ($1,052 cost)$247.82$991−$60.56−5.76%
- 2 sh × $616.73 ($1,233 cost)$621.65$1,243+$9.84+0.80%
- 12 sh × $88.24 ($1,059 cost)$98.63$1,184+$124.62+11.77%
- 5 sh × $205.93 ($1,030 cost)$208.47$1,042+$12.70+1.23%
- 1 sh × $69.06 ($69 cost)$66.90$67−$2.16−3.13%
- 2 sh × $122.84 ($246 cost)$122.64$245−$0.40−0.16%
- 7 sh × $145.33 ($1,017 cost)$145.84$1,021+$3.53+0.35%
- 6 sh × $162.17 ($973 cost)$181.58$1,089+$116.46+11.97%
- 1 sh × $135.79 ($136 cost)$151.53$152+$15.74+11.59%
- 1 sh × $30.37 ($30 cost)$31.61$32+$1.24+4.08%
- 10 sh × $96.20 ($962 cost)$95.90$959−$3.00−0.31%
- 1 sh × $84.64 ($85 cost)$83.30$83−$1.34−1.58%
- 11 sh × $90.85 ($999 cost)$89.88$989−$10.72−1.07%
- 2 sh × $407.69 ($815 cost)$384.82$770−$45.74−5.61%
- 2 sh × $380.30 ($761 cost)$364.46$729−$31.70−4.17%
- 33 sh × $48.88 ($1,613 cost)$52.23$1,724+$110.55+6.85%
- 32 sh × $33.82 ($1,082 cost)$37.09$1,187+$104.48+9.65%
- 2 sh × $118.44 ($237 cost)$122.48$245+$8.07+3.41%
- 3 sh × $266.80 ($800 cost)$273.22$820+$19.26+2.41%
- 15 sh × $68.26 ($1,024 cost)$70.73$1,061+$37.05+3.62%
- 16 sh × $63.31 ($1,013 cost)$64.00$1,024+$10.96+1.08%
- 2 sh × $375.42 ($751 cost)$375.10$750−$0.64−0.09%
- 2 sh × $392.03 ($784 cost)$385.33$771−$13.40−1.71%
- 1 sh × $831.32 ($831 cost)$787.30$787−$44.02−5.29%
- 4 sh × $308.91 ($1,236 cost)$334.54$1,338+$102.52+8.30%
- 2 sh × $478.38 ($957 cost)$464.09$928−$28.58−2.99%
- 13 sh × $78.71 ($1,023 cost)$82.53$1,073+$49.66+4.85%
- 1 sh × $556.71 ($557 cost)$665.81$666+$109.10+19.60%
- 14 sh × $70.87 ($992 cost)$67.12$940−$52.57−5.30%
- 6 sh × $174.78 ($1,049 cost)$171.45$1,029−$20.01−1.91%
- 9 sh × $132.36 ($1,191 cost)$134.44$1,210+$18.72+1.57%
- 16 sh × $61.84 ($989 cost)$69.53$1,112+$123.04+12.44%
- 2 sh × $446.93 ($894 cost)$426.51$853−$40.84−4.57%
- 1 sh × $1,033.22 ($1,033 cost)$988.78$989−$44.44−4.30%
- 4 sh × $454.85 ($1,819 cost)$497.02$1,988+$168.66+9.27%
- 3 sh × $320.18 ($961 cost)$310.03$930−$30.45−3.17%
- 2 sh × $388.18 ($776 cost)$415.24$830+$54.12+6.97%
- 8 sh × $151.50 ($1,212 cost)$170.90$1,367+$155.16+12.80%
- 12 sh × $82.70 ($992 cost)$87.15$1,046+$53.46+5.39%
- 2 sh × $379.04 ($758 cost)$423.45$847+$88.82+11.72%
- 18 sh × $56.56 ($1,018 cost)$60.63$1,091+$73.26+7.20%
- 5 sh × $205.26 ($1,026 cost)$220.47$1,102+$76.03+7.41%
- 5 sh × $196.80 ($984 cost)$217.90$1,090+$105.50+10.72%
- 17 sh × $57.20 ($972 cost)$56.51$961−$11.82−1.22%
- 1 sh × $998.86 ($999 cost)$1,004.11$1,004+$5.25+0.53%
- 9 sh × $197.58 ($1,778 cost)$212.45$1,912+$133.83+7.53%
- 35 sh × $28.79 ($1,008 cost)$31.46$1,101+$93.27+9.26%
- 2 sh × $577.45 ($1,155 cost)$543.70$1,087−$67.50−5.84%
Closed Positions
(200)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
Closed Positions
(200)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
How this agent thinks
Plain English. Skip the jargon, read this first.
Sits in cash 100% of the time and waits. The trigger is specific: an S&P 500 stock must drop 10% or more from its highest price in the last 30 days. When that happens, the agent pulls together a packet of evidence — recent news headlines, the latest SEC filings, the company's revenue and earnings, plus a summary of what the broader economy is doing — and hands it to Claude AI with one question: 'Is this company actually broken, or is the market overreacting to noise?' If Claude says the company is sound and there's a real chance of rebound, the agent buys. The agent sells the moment the stock recovers to its prior 30-day high (the original target), OR drops 8% below where it bought (the stop), OR has been held for 90 days — whichever happens first. The question it asks Claude is locked at day 0 and never changes — that way at day 365 we know exactly what the original analytic frame was worth. This agent is the CONTROL for the v3 rollout — it does NOT get pyramiding or re-entry, by design. It's the baseline that Agents V and VIII are measured against.
Universe: S&P 500 starter set (30 large-cap names, expandable) · Capital: $100,000
Prompt performance
Closed-position stats broken out by the prompt version that authored each buy.
| Prompt | Trades | W / L / S | Win rate | Avg P/L % | Total P/L | Avg hold | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unknown | 2 | 0 / 2 / 0 | 0% | -9% | -$236 | 1d | Jun 8, 2026 → Jun 9, 2026 |
| v1 | 179 | 87 / 92 / 0 | 48.6% | +2.82% | +$4,314 | 31.4d | May 15, 2026 → Sep 14, 2026 |
| v1+rec17 | 19 | 1 / 18 / 0 | 5.3% | -7.85% | -$1,403 | 16d | Aug 3, 2026 → Sep 14, 2026 |
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Broadcom remains fundamentally sound, with strong AI infrastructure tailwinds (custom ASIC demand, VMware integration revenue) and bullish analyst sentiment including price targets well above current levels ($1,000+ in 2 years). The 16.3% pullback from the 30-day high appears to be driven by sector-wide semiconductor rotation and macro rate pressure (5Y forward inflation rate 1.8σ above trend, weighing on growth multiples) rather than any company-specific deterioration — no guidance cuts, accounting issues, or demand collapse are evident in the filings or news. The most notable company-specific headwind is a potential EU antitrust probe into VMware bundling practices, but this is an early-stage regulatory risk rather than a confirmed adverse ruling.
UBS maintains a Buy rating on WYNN with a price target of $138, well above the current price of $87.70, suggesting institutional conviction in the company's fundamentals despite lowering the target. The ~19.7% drawdown from the 30-day high appears macro-driven rather than company-specific, as no deterioration, guidance cuts, or accounting issues are evident in the filings or headlines. The elevated 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR at 1.8σ above trend) adds rate-sensitivity headwinds, but WYNN's gaming/hospitality business model is not directly impaired by this factor in the near term.
Wedbush initiated DDOG at Outperform with a $275 price target on the same day as the analysis, suggesting institutional confidence in the name and implying ~24% upside from current levels — nearly enough to recover the full 30-day drawdown. There is no company-specific negative catalyst visible in the news (no guidance cut, no accounting issue, no sector collapse), making the 24.4% drawdown appear macro/sentiment-driven rather than fundamentally justified. The elevated 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR at 1.8σ above trend) adds rate-sensitivity headwinds for growth equities like DDOG, but the analyst coverage initiation provides a near-term positive catalyst that partially offsets this.
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is a diversified, investment-grade medical device and diagnostics company with a long track record of stable earnings and dividend growth, making it fundamentally sound in the absence of any negative company-specific news. The 13.1% drawdown from the 30-day high appears to be macro-driven rather than fundamental deterioration — no earnings warnings, guidance cuts, or accounting issues appear in the available evidence. The primary headwind is the elevated 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR at 1.8σ above trend), which pressures rate-sensitive and high-multiple healthcare names, but ABT's defensive characteristics and diversified revenue base provide resilience.
Amgen is a large-cap, diversified biopharmaceutical company with a strong balance sheet, robust free cash flow, and a broad product portfolio (Repatha, Enbrel, Evenity, MariTide in pipeline), making it fundamentally sound. The 15.6% drawdown from the 30-day high has no identifiable company-specific catalyst in the available evidence — no negative headlines, no guidance cuts, and no red-flag disclosures in the 10-Q or 8-K filings. The primary headwind is macro: the 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, pressuring rate-sensitive and high-debt sectors, and Amgen carries notable long-term debt; however, its cash generation capacity and defensive demand profile partially insulate it.
PARA (Paramount Global) was already a financially stressed company prior to this analysis window, carrying heavy debt loads and facing structural secular decline in its legacy media business. The stock is trading at $1.01 — deep penny-stock territory — having fallen 55.7% from its 30-day high of $2.28, which itself was already severely depressed. The complete absence of any news headlines or SEC filings in the window is itself a red flag at this price level, as it suggests the company may be in a quiet period ahead of a major corporate event (restructuring, bankruptcy, or distressed sale), and at sub-$1 prices the risk of delisting and equity impairment is significant.
BURL (Burlington Stores) is a well-established off-price retailer with a historically resilient business model, and there are no visible company-specific negative catalysts in the available evidence — no headlines citing guidance cuts, fraud, or operational deterioration. However, the macro backdrop presents a notable headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, which signals elevated rate expectations that pressure rate-sensitive equities and consumer discretionary names. The SEC filings (10-Q and 8-Ks) carry no extractable metrics, leaving fundamental deterioration neither confirmed nor ruled out, which introduces meaningful uncertainty. The 36.5% drawdown is severe, and without a constructive macro regime or clear evidence the drop is purely technical, the probability of a full rebound to the 30-day high within 90 days is tempered.
COO is down 31% from its 30-day high, which is a significant drawdown, but the news headlines don't indicate catastrophic deterioration — the weakness cited is in CooperVision, a known cyclical segment, while the company is actively pivoting toward fertility growth as an offset. However, the macro context is a headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate is running 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, which pressures rate-sensitive and leveraged businesses like COO. The 10-Q and 8-K filings lack disclosed metrics, preventing confirmation of earnings quality, and the muted news sentiment suggests the market may be pricing in persistent segment weakness rather than a transitory dip.
TPR (Tapestry) is down ~26% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative catalysts visible in the news or SEC filings — the 10-K and 8-K filed in mid-August show no flagged metrics indicating deterioration. However, the macro backdrop introduces a meaningful headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is printing 1.7σ above trend, signaling rate-sensitive pressure broadly, which weighs on consumer discretionary names like TPR. The only recent news is a neutral comparative valuation piece (ANF vs. TPR), suggesting the drop may be macro- and sector-driven rather than idiosyncratic, but the inflationary/rate pressure environment tempers the mean-reversion case.
NCLH is down 28.1% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news headlines in the window and sparse SEC filing metrics, suggesting the drop may be macro/sentiment-driven rather than fundamental deterioration. However, the macro backdrop is a headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above trend, signaling elevated rate expectations that are particularly punishing for highly leveraged, rate-sensitive companies like cruise lines. NCLH carries a substantial debt load from pandemic-era borrowing, making it acutely vulnerable to a higher-for-longer rate environment, which tempers the rebound outlook despite the absence of company-specific bad news.
XRAY (Dentsply Sirona) appears on a "stocks to steer clear of" list with negative sentiment (-0.35), suggesting company-specific concerns rather than a broad market selloff. The 10-Q and 8-K filings from early August lack detailed metrics in the provided data, making it difficult to confirm financial health, but the combination of a 27.1% drop and negative editorial coverage points to underlying deterioration rather than a mere macro-driven dip. Additionally, the elevated 5-year forward inflation rate (2.34, 1.8σ above trend) creates a headwind for rate-sensitive and consumer-discretionary-adjacent healthcare names.
WHR (Whirlpool) is down 25.2% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news headlines in the window and no extractable financial metrics from the recent 10-Q or 8-K filings, limiting fundamental visibility. The macro backdrop is a key concern: the 5-year forward inflation expectation (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, which is a headwind for rate-sensitive and consumer discretionary names like Whirlpool, as higher inflation expectations push up borrowing costs and suppress demand for big-ticket appliances. Without evidence of a catalyst driving the drop, this looks like a macro-driven re-rating rather than company-specific deterioration, but the rate environment provides a credible fundamental reason for the discount.
PCG (PG&E) is a regulated California utility that has historically been financially fragile due to wildfire liabilities and its 2019 bankruptcy, though it has since restructured and stabilized. There are no company-specific negative headlines or SEC filings in the window to explain the 25% drawdown, suggesting this may be macro-driven. However, the macro context is notably unfavorable: the 5-year forward inflation expectation (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above trend, signaling elevated rate pressure — a significant headwind for rate-sensitive, capital-intensive utilities like PCG, which carry substantial debt loads and depend on low discount rates for valuation.
CCL is down nearly 25% from its 30-day high with no available news headlines or meaningful SEC filing metrics to explain the drop, suggesting the selloff may be macro- or sentiment-driven rather than company-specific. However, the macro backdrop is a headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is printing 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, signaling elevated rate expectations that weigh on consumer discretionary and highly leveraged names like cruise lines. CCL carries a substantial debt load from pandemic-era financing, making it particularly sensitive to a higher-for-longer rate environment, which tempers conviction in a near-term rebound.
AAL is down 23.3% from its 30-day high, but the news sentiment is negative, with a headline explicitly questioning whether further downside is ahead. AAL carries a structurally heavy debt load and is highly sensitive to rising interest rate expectations; the macro context shows the 5-year forward inflation rate printing 1.7σ above its 24-month trend, which pressures rate-sensitive and leveraged companies like airlines. With no recent SEC filings to reassure on fundamentals, and negative analyst/media tone, the drop does not appear to be a pure macro-driven overreaction but may reflect genuine concern about AAL's cost structure and refinancing risk.
PODD (Insulet Corporation) is a fundamentally sound medtech company in the insulin delivery space with a strong product portfolio (OmniPod), and no news headlines or SEC filings in the window indicate company-specific deterioration such as guidance cuts, accounting issues, or competitive collapse. The 10-Q and 8-K filings lack extractable metrics, making it difficult to confirm recent financial trends, but the absence of negative catalysts in the news is somewhat reassuring. However, the macro backdrop presents a headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate is 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, suggesting elevated rate sensitivity that could weigh on growth-oriented medtech names like PODD, which typically trade at premium multiples.
ALK (Alaska Air Group) is down 21.6% from its 30-day high, but no company-specific negative catalysts are evident — the sole news headline references American Airlines, not ALK directly, and the 10-Q filing for Q2 2026 appears routine with no flagged metrics indicating deterioration. However, the macro backdrop introduces meaningful headwinds: the 5-year forward inflation rate is running 1.7σ above its 24-month trend, which pressures rate-sensitive and cost-sensitive sectors like airlines (fuel costs, debt servicing). The combination of elevated inflation expectations, sector-wide airline sentiment caution, and thin evidence supporting a near-term catalyst keeps rebound probability below the buy threshold despite the drawdown being plausible as mean-reverting in isolation.
The drop is driven by clear, company-specific fundamental deterioration: LULU reported a Q2 revenue miss, slashed forward guidance, and saw weakness in both North America and China — its two most critical markets. Headlines note the stock fell to an eight-year low with a new CEO "inheriting a mess," signaling structural brand and product pressure rather than a temporary macro-driven selloff. The macro backdrop is additionally unfavorable, with a strong jobs report reviving Fed rate-hike bets and the 5-year forward inflation rate printing 1.7σ above trend, creating headwinds for consumer discretionary stocks.
There are no company-specific negative headlines, guidance cuts, or SEC filings in the window to explain the 23% drawdown in SEE (Sealed Air Corp), suggesting the move may be technically or macro-driven rather than fundamental deterioration. However, the macro backdrop is a meaningful headwind: the 5-year forward inflation expectation (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, indicating elevated rate-sensitivity risk that would pressure a capital-intensive, leveraged packaging company like Sealed Air. The absence of any corroborating news or filings leaves the cause of the drop ambiguous, limiting conviction in a near-term rebound.
PVH is down 22.5% from its 30-day high, but the available evidence is thin — SEC filings (two 8-Ks and a 10-Q) carry no reported metrics, and there are no news headlines to explain the drop or confirm company-specific deterioration. PVH is a well-established apparel holding company (Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger) with a history of cyclical but recoverable drawdowns, suggesting the underlying business remains structurally sound. However, the macro backdrop is a mild headwind: the 5-year forward inflation expectation (T5YIFR) is running 1.8σ above trend, which pressures rate-sensitive and consumer discretionary names like PVH, and the absence of any catalytic news makes it difficult to assign high conviction to a near-term rebound.
TJX is a fundamentally strong off-price retailer with a resilient business model and long track record of navigating macro headwinds; no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, accounting issues, or operational deterioration) are evident in the available SEC filings or news. The 22.4% drawdown from the 30-day high appears macro-driven rather than fundamental, with the 5-year forward inflation rate running ~1.8σ above trend, which pressures rate-sensitive and consumer-discretionary valuations broadly. Absent specific bad news and given TJX's defensive positioning within retail (off-price tends to benefit in tighter consumer spending environments), the drop looks overdone and mean-reversion is plausible within 90 days.
RCL is down 20.6% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news headlines or material deterioration visible in recent 8-K filings (no metrics reported that signal guidance cuts, accounting issues, or operational collapse). However, the macro context is a headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is running 1.7σ above its 24-month trend, which pressures rate-sensitive and consumer-discretionary names like cruise lines that carry significant debt loads and depend on consumer spending. The absence of any news also limits visibility into whether this drawdown is purely macro-driven or reflects an unreported catalyst.
International Paper (IP) is down ~21.9% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative headlines in the window and minimal detail from the recent 10-Q and 8-K filings (metrics are empty), making it difficult to identify a fundamental catalyst for the drop. However, the macro backdrop is a headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate is running 1.8σ above trend, which pressures rate-sensitive and capital-intensive sectors like paper/packaging. IP carries significant debt and its business is cyclically sensitive to input costs, demand, and interest rates, all of which are challenged in a higher-inflation regime. Without constructive macro support or a clear oversold catalyst, the mean-reversion case is weaker than it would be in a calm, low-rate environment.
BLDR (Builders FirstSource) is down 21.4% from its 30-day high, but no company-specific negative catalysts are evident in the available news or SEC filings — the 8-Ks and 10-Q filed in late July/early August have no extractable metrics flagging deterioration. However, the macro backdrop is a meaningful headwind: the 5-year forward inflation rate (T5YIFR) is printing 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, signaling elevated rate expectations that directly pressure housing starts and homebuilder-adjacent names like BLDR. As a rate-sensitive building products distributor, BLDR is particularly exposed to this regime, making the drawdown at least partially macro-justified rather than a pure mean-reversion opportunity.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Nothing on the watchlist right now.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Netflix Climbs 4%, Alphabet Ticks Up, Amazon Barely Budges as New Streaming Policy Alliance Launches
Bitcoin Climbs as AI Slowdown Calls Sink Nvidia, Intel and Other Chip Stocks
Bitcoin Climbs as AI Slowdown Calls Sink Nvidia, Intel and Other Chip Stocks
CrowdStrike Jumps Over 12.2% as Its Market Value Reaches 41 Times ARR
Wall Street hit by tech sell-off after AI bosses push for slowdown
Wall Street hit by tech sell-off after AI bosses push for slowdown
Palantir, Nvidia, Booz Allen restrict Anthropic and OpenAI models
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
- Sep 14, 12:53 PMpolicy · severity 3/5
Trump calls AI the greatest economic development engine in history.
- Sep 14, 11:56 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
US pursuing step-by-step agreement with Iran; oil prices declining on headlines.
- Sep 14, 10:18 AMcompany · severity 3/5
Major AI labs call for slower development pace citing risks and economic pressures.
- Sep 14, 9:15 AMcompany · severity 4/5
Analysis of Nvidia's Q2 results and forward guidance implications.
Tickers:NVDA - Sep 14, 8:39 AMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Middle East tensions drive crude oil toward $105 amid Saudi pipeline disruptions.
- Sep 14, 8:14 AMmarket · severity 3/5
AI semiconductor and infrastructure stocks face heavy selling pressure ahead of Monday market open.
- Sep 14, 7:59 AMmarket · severity 3/5
AI stocks decline on safety concerns; analyst provides guidance on positioning.
- Sep 14, 7:31 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Central bank week begins with USD strength and equity market pressure.
- Sep 14, 6:55 AMpolicy · severity 4/5
Fed rate hike bets surge in September amid AI stock weakness and oil surge.
- Sep 14, 6:38 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
EU imposes 24-72 hour vulnerability reporting requirements on crypto wallet providers.
- Sep 14, 6:15 AMmarket · severity 3/5
Crypto outperforms as calls for slower AI development pressure technology sector stocks.
- Sep 14, 5:53 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
India's August CPI rises to 4.82%, signaling potential central bank rate hike.
- Sep 14, 5:12 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Bitcoin faces selloff risk ahead of FOMC decision and CLARITY Act vote.
- Sep 14, 5:00 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Bitcoin volatility expected ahead of Senate CLARITY Act vote and Fed rate decision.
- Sep 14, 4:55 AMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Saudi crown prince and US CENTCOM chief discuss Houthi escalation response.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
- Sep 14, 10:21 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 14, 8:46 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 14, 8:37 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 3 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 11, 5:02 PM157 trigger(s) [43 cached, 114 Claude], 13 bought, 144 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 134 watch-listed. Exits: 2.
- Sep 11, 8:59 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 10, 3:29 PMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Sep 10, 3:25 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 3 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 9, 2:59 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 8, 10:44 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 8, 8:58 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 4, 6:21 PM127 trigger(s) [0 cached, 127 Claude], 21 bought, 105 skipped, 1 analyze failures, 97 watch-listed. Exits: 8.
- Sep 4, 5:05 PMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 4163s.
- Sep 3, 8:44 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 2, 12:45 PMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Sep 2, 12:40 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 2, 8:57 AMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Sep 2, 8:55 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 1, 2:27 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 1, 12:29 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 3 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Sep 1, 8:59 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target