Scorecard
Head to head
Frozen prompt vs. evolving prompt
Open Positions
(79)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
Open Positions
(79)Every open position with the thesis logged at entry.
- 8 sh × $130.53 ($1,044 cost)$130.53$1,044+$0.00+0.00%
- 9 sh × $109.31 ($984 cost)$109.31$984+$0.00+0.00%
- 5 sh × $193.60 ($968 cost)$195.08$975+$7.40+0.76%
- 7 sh × $144.45 ($1,011 cost)$145.55$1,019+$7.70+0.76%
- 27 sh × $39.69 ($1,072 cost)$40.84$1,103+$31.05+2.90%
- 10 sh × $128.38 ($1,284 cost)$125.35$1,254−$30.30−2.36%
- 4 sh × $258.68 ($1,035 cost)$264.90$1,060+$24.88+2.40%
- 2 sh × $811.30 ($1,623 cost)$778.31$1,557−$65.98−4.07%
- 8 sh × $134.70 ($1,078 cost)$129.50$1,036−$41.60−3.86%
- 4 sh × $256.47 ($1,026 cost)$251.73$1,007−$18.96−1.85%
- 5 sh × $188.89 ($944 cost)$196.45$982+$37.80+4.00%
- 6 sh × $331.98 ($1,992 cost)$347.01$2,082+$90.18+4.53%
- 2 sh × $420.82 ($842 cost)$417.99$836−$5.66−0.67%
- 2 sh × $641.39 ($1,283 cost)$641.69$1,283+$0.60+0.05%
- 11 sh × $98.15 ($1,080 cost)$95.64$1,052−$27.61−2.56%
- 4 sh × $212.61 ($850 cost)$219.89$880+$29.12+3.42%
- 16 sh × $99.10 ($1,586 cost)$101.65$1,626+$40.80+2.57%
- 13 sh × $78.17 ($1,016 cost)$79.54$1,034+$17.81+1.75%
- 9 sh × $106.52 ($959 cost)$113.75$1,024+$65.07+6.79%
- 5 sh × $184.61 ($923 cost)$194.80$974+$50.95+5.52%
- 7 sh × $147.13 ($1,030 cost)$158.32$1,108+$78.33+7.61%
- 7 sh × $136.27 ($954 cost)$142.28$996+$42.07+4.41%
- 3 sh × $246.76 ($740 cost)$242.86$729−$11.70−1.58%
- 3 sh × $288.74 ($866 cost)$306.24$919+$52.50+6.06%
- 6 sh × $165.87 ($995 cost)$170.59$1,024+$28.32+2.85%
- 12 sh × $85.19 ($1,022 cost)$89.75$1,077+$54.72+5.35%
- 6 sh × $146.51 ($879 cost)$152.48$915+$35.82+4.07%
- 2 sh × $358.22 ($716 cost)$390.22$780+$64.00+8.93%
- 2 sh × $567.08 ($1,134 cost)$596.04$1,192+$57.92+5.11%
- 35 sh × $29.96 ($1,049 cost)$31.92$1,117+$68.60+6.54%
- 2 sh × $363.56 ($727 cost)$397.97$796+$68.82+9.46%
- 4 sh × $264.59 ($1,058 cost)$297.33$1,189+$130.96+12.37%
- 11 sh × $88.29 ($971 cost)$97.10$1,068+$96.91+9.98%
- 17 sh × $59.42 ($1,010 cost)$59.24$1,007−$3.06−0.30%
- 4 sh × $216.90 ($868 cost)$226.61$906+$38.84+4.48%
- 4 sh × $449.04 ($1,796 cost)$534.06$2,136+$340.08+18.93%
- 2 sh × $410.41 ($821 cost)$450.00$900+$79.18+9.65%
- 7 sh × $226.17 ($1,583 cost)$217.84$1,525−$58.31−3.68%
- 28 sh × $38.29 ($1,072 cost)$38.48$1,077+$5.32+0.50%
- 9 sh × $109.12 ($982 cost)$113.14$1,018+$36.23+3.69%
- 6 sh × $162.07 ($972 cost)$172.47$1,035+$62.40+6.42%
- 6 sh × $173.32 ($1,040 cost)$174.54$1,047+$7.32+0.70%
- 8 sh × $121.80 ($974 cost)$123.34$987+$12.32+1.26%
- 16 sh × $66.22 ($1,060 cost)$63.01$1,008−$51.36−4.85%
- 8 sh × $153.14 ($1,225 cost)$159.58$1,277+$51.52+4.21%
- 1 sh × $880.39 ($880 cost)$955.68$956+$75.29+8.55%
- 5 sh × $154.81 ($774 cost)$160.74$804+$29.65+3.83%
- 6 sh × $171.07 ($1,026 cost)$197.29$1,184+$157.32+15.33%
- 1 sh × $552.44 ($552 cost)$602.01$602+$49.57+8.97%
- 3 sh × $319.62 ($959 cost)$323.01$969+$10.17+1.06%
- 4 sh × $251.62 ($1,006 cost)$243.08$972−$34.16−3.39%
- 1 sh × $891.28 ($891 cost)$916.56$917+$25.28+2.84%
- 8 sh × $122.27 ($978 cost)$124.01$992+$13.92+1.42%
- 38 sh × $27.47 ($1,044 cost)$31.83$1,210+$165.65+15.87%
- 13 sh × $76.41 ($993 cost)$77.10$1,002+$8.97+0.90%
- 7 sh × $139.54 ($977 cost)$147.76$1,034+$57.54+5.89%
- 3 sh × $285.34 ($856 cost)$309.64$929+$72.90+8.52%
- 17 sh × $61.15 ($1,040 cost)$63.43$1,078+$38.76+3.73%
- 17 sh × $61.31 ($1,042 cost)$68.42$1,163+$120.87+11.60%
- 15 sh × $68.00 ($1,020 cost)$69.09$1,036+$16.35+1.60%
- 4 sh × $221.62 ($886 cost)$229.43$918+$31.26+3.53%
- 5 sh × $188.11 ($941 cost)$190.65$953+$12.70+1.35%
- 21 sh × $48.71 ($1,023 cost)$51.67$1,085+$62.16+6.08%
- 8 sh × $124.21 ($994 cost)$137.48$1,100+$106.16+10.68%
- 12 sh × $81.90 ($983 cost)$86.05$1,033+$49.80+5.07%
- 20 sh × $52.76 ($1,055 cost)$54.50$1,090+$34.80+3.30%
- 2 sh × $512.37 ($1,025 cost)$519.43$1,039+$14.12+1.38%
- 1 sh × $129.75 ($130 cost)$145.44$145+$15.69+12.09%
- 2 sh × $279.37 ($559 cost)$302.44$605+$46.14+8.26%
- 2 sh × $461.88 ($924 cost)$508.20$1,016+$92.64+10.03%
- 1 sh × $231.49 ($231 cost)$232.29$232+$0.80+0.35%
- 4 sh × $231.51 ($926 cost)$251.02$1,004+$78.04+8.43%
- 3 sh × $317.00 ($951 cost)$327.88$984+$32.64+3.43%
- 5 sh × $232.19 ($1,161 cost)$242.11$1,211+$49.60+4.27%
- 3 sh × $312.75 ($938 cost)$320.60$962+$23.55+2.51%
- 2 sh × $496.76 ($994 cost)$513.61$1,027+$33.70+3.39%
- 5 sh × $180.57 ($903 cost)$192.81$964+$61.20+6.78%
- 10 sh × $101.95 ($1,020 cost)$108.52$1,085+$65.70+6.44%
- 1 sh × $1,057.66 ($1,058 cost)$1,124.56$1,125+$66.90+6.33%
Closed Positions
(363)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
Closed Positions
(363)Every position this agent has closed, win or lose. Click any to see why it was opened and closed.
How this agent thinks
Plain English. Skip the jargon, read this first.
Sits in cash 100% of the time and waits. The trigger is specific: an S&P 500 stock must drop 10% or more from its highest price in the last 30 days. When that happens, the agent pulls together a packet of evidence — recent news headlines, the latest SEC filings, the company's revenue and earnings, plus a summary of what the broader economy is doing — and hands it to Claude AI with one question: 'Is this company actually broken, or is the market overreacting to noise?' If Claude says the company is sound and there's a real chance of rebound, the agent buys. The agent sells the moment the stock recovers to its prior 30-day high (the original target), OR drops 8% below where it bought (the stop), OR has been held for 90 days — whichever happens first. The question it asks Claude is locked at day 0 and never changes — that way at day 365 we know exactly what the original analytic frame was worth. This agent is the CONTROL for the v3 rollout — it does NOT get pyramiding or re-entry, by design. It's the baseline that Agents V and VIII are measured against.
Universe: S&P 500 starter set (30 large-cap names, expandable) · Capital: $100,000
Prompt performance
Closed-position stats broken out by the prompt version that authored each buy.
| Prompt | Trades | W / L / S | Win rate | Avg P/L % | Total P/L | Avg hold | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unknown | 2 | 0 / 2 / 0 | 0% | -9% | -$236 | 1d | Jun 8, 2026 → Jun 9, 2026 |
| v1 | 203 | 103 / 100 / 0 | 50.7% | +2.83% | +$5,212 | 36.7d | May 15, 2026 → Oct 29, 2026 |
| v1+rec17 | 158 | 53 / 105 / 0 | 33.5% | -0.5% | -$1,253 | 26.7d | Aug 3, 2026 → Nov 13, 2026 |
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
Recent activity
(24)What the agent has been looking at and what it's done about it.
SEE (Sealed Air Corporation) has dropped 34.3% from its 30-day high with absolutely no news headlines, SEC filings, or company-specific catalysts available to explain the move. In the absence of any evidence of fundamental deterioration, the drop could be technical or sector-driven. However, the macro context is a concern: the T10Y2Y spread is running 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a flattening/near-inversion regime that weighs on cyclical and industrial names like SEE. With no data to confirm soundness and a macro headwind, confidence in a rebound is limited.
DELL has dropped 42.1% from its 30-day high, which is a severe drawdown even by volatile tech-hardware standards. Critically, there are no news headlines in the 30-day window to explain the drop, and the lone 8-K filed on 2026-10-21 contains no reported metrics — leaving the cause of the decline opaque but not clearly tied to fundamental deterioration. The macro backdrop shows a T10Y2Y of 0.24 (2σ below trend), indicating a flattening/near-inversion environment that is modestly negative for cyclical and capital-intensive hardware names like DELL, reducing confidence in a near-term rebound.
PARA has collapsed 98.8% from its 30-day high ($8.93 → $0.10), which is not a typical mean-reversion dip but rather a near-total wipeout consistent with a severe corporate event such as bankruptcy, delisting, or a catastrophic restructuring. With no news headlines and no recent SEC filings available, the absence of information itself is a red flag — companies in this situation often have trading halted or are in a distressed corporate action. The macro context (a slightly below-trend yield curve) provides no meaningful support for a company-specific collapse of this magnitude.
AVB (AvalonBay Communities) is a well-established residential REIT with generally sound fundamentals, but the 64.2% drawdown from its 30-day high — from ~$3,764 to ~$1,348 — is extraordinarily severe and far exceeds anything explained by normal volatility or sector rotation. The absence of any news headlines or meaningful SEC filing metrics makes it impossible to identify a recovery catalyst, and the macro context is actively unfavorable: the 5-year forward inflation rate is 1.8σ above its 24-month trend, signaling a rising-rate environment that directly pressures rate-sensitive REITs like AVB. A 64% single-month collapse in a blue-chip REIT almost certainly reflects a structural event (special dividend, spin-off, reverse split artifact, or genuine distress) rather than a correctable sentiment overshoot.
The 50.4% drawdown from INTC's 30-day high is exceptionally large and difficult to attribute purely to sector noise — a move of this magnitude typically reflects company-specific deterioration or a structural re-rating. While the most recent news (Nov. 11) is modestly positive — Intel climbing on AI chip enthusiasm, ETF buying of $360.9M, and turnaround narratives — a critical negative catalyst stands out: an 87-million-share dilution risk tied to the SoftBank deal (sentiment=-0.40), which introduces meaningful near-term overhang. The macro backdrop (10YIE at 2.2%, well below trend) is actually constructive for long-duration equities, but Intel's fundamental turnaround remains unproven and the 10-Q and 8-K filings provided no quantitative metrics to anchor valuation confidence.
MRVL is a fundamentally sound semiconductor company with strong positioning in AI/data center custom silicon and networking, with no company-specific negative news (guidance cuts, fraud, or accounting issues) visible in the available evidence. However, the 48% drawdown from the 30-day high is exceptionally severe — well beyond the typical noise range — and the absence of any explanatory headlines makes this concerning rather than reassuring, as it may reflect information not yet captured in the evidence window (e.g., a large earnings miss or guidance cut embedded in the 8-K filings with empty metrics). The macro backdrop shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 2σ below trend), which is not particularly supportive for growth/semiconductor names, and the magnitude of the drop (nearly half the stock's value) makes a full rebound to the 30-day high within 90 days unlikely.
TER (Teradyne) has dropped 44.3% from its 30-day high with no available news headlines to explain the decline and SEC filings with no reported metrics — leaving the cause of the drawdown opaque and concerning. The 10-Q filed 2026-10-30 and an 8-K from 2026-10-28 lack visible financial detail, making it impossible to confirm whether fundamentals remain intact or have deteriorated. The macro backdrop shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 2.0σ below trend), which is modestly negative for cyclical semiconductor/test equipment names like Teradyne, adding a headwind to a rebound thesis.
FMC Corporation has experienced a severe 45.6% drawdown from its 30-day high, falling from $9.30 to $5.06 — a price level that suggests deeply distressed market sentiment. While no company-specific news or SEC filings are available in the window to explain the drop, the absence of headlines is a double-edged sword: it removes clear negative catalysts but also provides no positive confirming narrative. FMC operates in the agricultural chemicals sector, which has faced cyclical headwinds including destocking, pricing pressure, and weak demand across global ag markets in recent years; at ~$5, the stock is likely pricing in serious fundamental stress. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign and even mildly supportive for real assets, but FMC as an ag-chem company is not primarily a rates-driven trade, limiting macro tailwind relevance.
STX (Seagate Technology) has dropped 41.5% from its 30-day high, a severe drawdown with no available news headlines or meaningful SEC filing metrics to explain or refute company-specific deterioration. The 10-Q and 8-K filings are present but lack extracted financial metrics, making fundamental assessment difficult. The macro backdrop is modestly concerning — the yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2σ below trend) signals a flattening/near-inversion environment, which historically pressures cyclical tech names like hard drive manufacturers. The absence of any news could indicate a data gap rather than a clean backdrop, adding uncertainty to the thesis.
SMCI is down 41% from its 30-day high with no news headlines available to explain the drop, and the SEC filings (10-Q and two 8-Ks) contain no reported metrics, leaving the cause of the decline opaque. SMCI has a well-documented history of accounting controversies and delayed filings, so a sharp, unexplained decline of this magnitude in this name carries meaningful company-specific risk that cannot be dismissed. The macro backdrop offers a mild tailwind — 10-year inflation expectations are running 1.7σ below trend, which is favorable for growth/tech names — but that alone is insufficient to overcome the uncertainty surrounding the filing data gaps and SMCI's track record.
DDOG is a fundamentally sound, high-growth cloud observability and security platform with a strong competitive moat and recurring revenue model. The 38.7% drawdown from its 30-day high is dramatic, but no company-specific negative catalysts are apparent — the recent 10-Q and 8-K filings lack disclosed metrics that signal deterioration, and there are no headlines in the window indicating guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector collapse. However, the macro context shows inflation expectations (T10YIE) printing notably below trend, which could signal growth concerns or risk-off sentiment particularly affecting long-duration, high-multiple growth stocks like DDOG, partially explaining the selloff.
F5 Networks (FFIV) is a fundamentally sound company with a strong balance sheet, recurring software/subscription revenue, and a well-established position in application delivery and security. However, the 35.7% drop from the 30-day high is unusually large and no news headlines or SEC filings are available to explain the catalyst, which makes it difficult to determine whether this is an overreaction or reflects a serious undisclosed deterioration. The macro backdrop is modestly concerning — mortgage rates elevated at 7.18% (1.9σ above trend) signal a tighter financial conditions environment, though FFIV is not directly rate-sensitive as an enterprise tech company.
ServiceNow (NOW) is a high-quality enterprise SaaS platform with strong recurring revenue, robust free cash flow generation, and a dominant position in IT workflow automation — fundamentally sound by most measures. The 35.6% drawdown from its 30-day high is severe, but there are no company-specific negative catalysts in the evidence window (no news headlines, no adverse SEC filings). The macro context shows the 10-year inflation breakeven at 2.2% (1.7σ below trend), signaling disinflationary pressure, which is a mild tailwind for long-duration growth equities like NOW, though it may also reflect demand concerns.
Lam Research (LRCX) is a fundamentally sound semiconductor equipment leader with strong long-term positioning in etch and deposition for advanced node manufacturing. The 35.7% drawdown from its 30-day high is severe, yet no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, accounting issues, fraud) are identifiable in the available evidence — no news headlines exist in the window, and the SEC filings lack reported metrics that would signal deterioration. However, the macro backdrop introduces caution: the T10Y2Y spread is 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, suggesting a flattening/near-inversion environment that historically pressures cyclical and capital-equipment names. Semiconductor equipment stocks like LRCX are highly cyclical and macro-sensitive, moderating rebound confidence despite the absence of firm-specific bad news.
CTVA (Corteva) is a fundamentally sound agricultural sciences company with a defensible business model in crop protection and seeds, but the 37.1% drop from its 30-day high to $9.19 is exceptionally severe and unexplained by any available evidence. No news headlines exist in the window, and the three 8-K filings lack financial metrics, leaving the cause of the drawdown entirely opaque — a large unexplained drop is itself a warning signal. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE) running 1.7σ below trend, which is modestly constructive for long-duration assets but does not specifically benefit agricultural inputs companies.
Fortinet (FTNT) is a fundamentally sound cybersecurity company with strong recurring revenue, healthy margins, and a well-established market position in network security. No company-specific negative catalysts appear in the evidence window — no earnings misses, guidance cuts, accounting issues, or sector collapse headlines — suggesting the 35% drawdown may be technically or macro-driven rather than fundamentals-driven. However, the macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE) printing 1.7σ below trend, which signals a deflationary or risk-off tilt that could weigh on growth-oriented tech names and reduce near-term mean-reversion momentum.
TEAM (Atlassian) is a fundamentally sound enterprise software company with a strong competitive moat in collaboration and DevOps tools, and no company-specific negative news (guidance cuts, fraud, or deterioration) is visible in the available evidence. The 10-Q and 8-K filings from early November are present but lack reported metrics, making it impossible to assess whether the Q1 FY2027 results drove the ~35% drawdown — this ambiguity is a significant concern, as such a sharp drop often coincides with an earnings miss or guidance cut. The macro backdrop shows elevated Fed Funds Rate (3.88%, 2σ above trend), which pressures high-multiple growth stocks like TEAM and reduces the likelihood of a near-term mean reversion to prior highs.
HPE is down 34.4% from its 30-day high with no news headlines available to explain the drop, and the 8-K filed on 2026-11-04 contains no disclosed metrics to signal a specific catalyst. However, the macro environment shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2σ below trend), which is a headwind for cyclical tech/IT infrastructure names like HPE that depend on enterprise capital spending. Without confirming news of earnings deterioration, guidance cuts, or accounting issues, HPE's underlying business — a diversified IT infrastructure and hybrid cloud provider — appears fundamentally intact, but the macro signal warrants caution on the speed of recovery.
WDC (Western Digital) is down 34% from its 30-day high with no company-specific negative news headlines in the window and no meaningful financial metrics surfacing from the recent 10-Q or 8-K filings, suggesting the drop may be macro/sector-driven rather than a fundamental deterioration event. However, the macro context is mildly concerning: the T10Y2Y spread is 2.0σ below its 24-month trend, indicating a flatter/slightly inverted yield curve environment that can weigh on cyclical tech and storage stocks. Without a clearly constructive macro backdrop and given the extreme magnitude of the drawdown (34%), a full reversion to the 30-day high within 90 days faces meaningful headwinds even absent bad news.
Corning (GLW) is a well-established, diversified specialty glass and materials company with a long track record of financial stability, significant exposure to secular growth themes (fiber optics, display glass, life sciences), and no negative company-specific news or SEC filings in the evidence window to explain the 33.1% drawdown. The macro backdrop shows a flattening yield curve (T10Y2Y at 0.24, 2σ below trend), which is modestly headwind for cyclical industrials but not catastrophic. The absence of any headline catalyst for the drop is a mild positive signal for mean reversion, though the magnitude of the decline (>30%) without an identifiable macro or idiosyncratic trigger introduces meaningful uncertainty about whether an undisclosed negative event is at play.
NVDA is a fundamentally dominant company in AI accelerator hardware with strong revenue growth, high margins, and a durable competitive moat — no news headlines or SEC filings in the window suggest company-specific deterioration, making this a technically-driven drawdown rather than a fundamental one. The macro backdrop features a 10-year inflation breakeven running 1.7σ below trend at 2.2%, suggesting a low-rate, low-inflation environment that is generally supportive of high-multiple growth stocks like NVDA. However, the 31.7% drawdown is severe and without any confirming news context, uncertainty about the catalyst is elevated, moderating confidence in a 90-day mean reversion to the prior high of $243.37.
ILMN is down 31.1% from its 30-day high, but there are no news headlines or clearly substantive SEC filing metrics in the evidence window to explain a company-specific deterioration event such as a guidance cut, fraud, or accounting issue. The 10-Q and 8-K filings are present but contain no extracted metrics, making it impossible to confirm financial health with precision; however, Illumina remains the dominant genomic sequencing platform with a broadly sound long-term business model. The macro context (elevated mortgage rates) is not directly relevant to ILMN's business, offering neither a tailwind nor a headwind specific to genomics instrumentation.
AMAT (Applied Materials) is a fundamentally sound semiconductor equipment leader with strong long-term demand drivers tied to AI, advanced node transitions, and global fab buildouts. The 30.4% drawdown from the 30-day high is significant, but no company-specific bad news (guidance cuts, accounting issues, or fraud) is evident in the available filings or headlines — the 8-Ks filed are sparse on metrics, suggesting routine disclosures rather than material negative events. The macro backdrop shows inflation expectations (T10YIE at 2.2, 1.7σ below trend) that are benign and potentially supportive of long-duration/growth assets like semis, though the absence of a clearly constructive broad market signal tempers conviction.
Caterpillar is a financially robust industrial bellwether with a long track record of strong cash generation and dividends, and no company-specific negative catalysts (guidance cuts, fraud, or sector collapse) are evident in the available filings or news window. However, the 33.3% drawdown from the 30-day high is severe and atypical for a blue-chip like CAT, suggesting either a broader macro dislocation or a significant sector-level headwind. The macro backdrop shows the fed funds rate running 2.0σ above its 24-month trend, which raises financing costs and can weigh on capital-goods demand — a direct headwind for CAT's end markets (construction, mining, energy).
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Watching
(0)Names this agent is tracking but hasn't entered.
Nothing on the watchlist right now.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
Relevant news
(30)Recent headlines on tickers this agent holds, watches, or has evaluated.
4 Durable Dividend Stocks Retirees Can Count On for Passive Income
4 Durable Dividend Stocks Retirees Can Count On for Passive Income
Citi Expects Data Center Construction Growth to Continue Despite Rising Costs and Regulatory Delays
Is Credo Technology a Better AI Networking Buy Than Broadcom?
Italy Fines Meta €805 Million. Why the Legal Route Matters More Than the Money
Why falling AI token prices aren’t the negative for AI providers one might assume
Why falling AI token prices aren’t the negative for AI providers one might assume
Meta (META) Faces $880 Million Italy Fine Over User Photo Access
Kraft Heinz vs. PepsiCo: Which Consumer Goods Stock Is a Better Buy for 2027?
How Retirees Can Turn $175,000 Into Passive Income With These 4 Dividend Stocks
How Retirees Can Turn $175,000 Into Passive Income With These 4 Dividend Stocks
Preferred Stocks Are Yielding Up to 8% After a Selloff. Why It’s a Buying Opportunity.
Preferred Stocks Are Yielding Up to 8% After a Selloff. Why It’s a Buying Opportunity.
Anthropic Just Delivered Great News for AMD Investors and Bad News for Nvidia
Micron, Amazon, and IBM: My 3 Favorite Stocks to Buy and Hold Through 2030
Sempra (SRE) Stock May Be Undervalued Despite Its Oncor Spending Increase
From Dodge to Anthropic: The Century-Old Playbook Taking Over Tech IPOs
This Week in TSLA: 24/7 Robotaxis, Cybertruck-Based SUV, $10 Billion Solar Bet and More
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
Macro & geopolitical context
(15)High-severity world events that touch this agent's universe.
- Nov 15, 9:26 AMmarket · severity 3/5
Nvidia and Anthropic expected to drive AI sector momentum in the week ahead.
Tickers:NVDA - Nov 15, 7:00 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
EV makers skeptical of Democratic restoration of federal EV support after midterm elections.
Tickers:TSLA - Nov 15, 6:51 AMcompany · severity 3/5
Airlines face ongoing recovery from FAA-ordered ground stop disrupting operations.
- Nov 15, 2:40 AMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Houthis gain control near critical Bab el-Mandeb Strait; shipping and energy routes at risk.
- Nov 14, 10:25 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Iran attacks US base; Bahrain issues threat alerts, raising Middle East tensions and oil market risks.
- Nov 14, 8:58 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Saudi coalition intercepts missiles and drones targeting Riyadh and Eastern Province.
Tickers:COP - Nov 14, 5:29 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Israeli military strikes senior Hamas commander in ongoing Middle East conflict.
- Nov 14, 12:48 PMcompany · severity 4/5
Nvidia leadership crisis impacts AI sector; S&P 500 gains 2.5% weekly despite tech turbulence.
Tickers:NVDA - Nov 14, 9:00 AMpolicy · severity 3/5
Central banks test cross-border FX settlement using stablecoins amid crypto adoption.
- Nov 14, 5:04 AMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Trump signals potential restraint on Iran military action absent new provocations.
- Nov 14, 4:31 AMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
Iranian oil tanker catches fire after mine strike in Strait of Hormuz, escalating regional tensions.
- Nov 13, 6:22 PMgeopolitical · severity 3/5
Trump plans to discuss nuclear-arms cuts with Putin and Xi on Thursday.
- Nov 13, 4:02 PMpolicy · severity 4/5
October PPI misses expectations; Fed hawkish concerns ease amid softer inflation data.
- Nov 13, 3:46 PMpolicy · severity 3/5
US extends 90-day shipping waiver to facilitate oil and commodity movement.
- Nov 13, 3:35 PMgeopolitical · severity 4/5
FAA grounds all US departing flights citing extraordinary safety circumstance.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
Recent runs
(20)Every scheduled run for this agent. Most are no-op; the interesting ones show what changed.
- Nov 13, 6:30 PM84 trigger(s) [68 cached, 16 Claude], 2 bought, 82 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 79 watch-listed. Exits: 0.
- Nov 12, 6:30 PM89 trigger(s) [69 cached, 20 Claude], 2 bought, 87 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 84 watch-listed. Exits: 1.
- Nov 11, 6:30 PM82 trigger(s) [44 cached, 38 Claude], 4 bought, 78 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 75 watch-listed. Exits: 2.
- Nov 10, 6:30 PM93 trigger(s) [51 cached, 42 Claude], 7 bought, 86 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 84 watch-listed. Exits: 6.
- Nov 9, 8:35 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 6, 6:30 PM118 trigger(s) [20 cached, 98 Claude], 21 bought, 97 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 94 watch-listed. Exits: 5.
- Nov 5, 3:05 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 5, 11:36 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 5, 11:10 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 2 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 5, 10:40 AMClosed by janitor — finished_at was NULL after 3846s.
- Nov 4, 12:25 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 4, 11:26 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 4, 9:40 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 3, 1:10 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 3, 1:05 PMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached
- Nov 2, 4:00 PM76 trigger(s) [14 cached, 62 Claude], 8 bought, 68 skipped, 0 analyze failures, 66 watch-listed. Exits: 8.
- Nov 2, 1:40 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Nov 2, 11:40 AMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Oct 30, 1:41 PMintraday stop sweep: closed 1 position(s) on breached stop/target
- Oct 30, 1:25 PMintraday stop sweep: no stops or targets breached